All Activity
This stream auto-updates
- Today
-
Wvsbakad joined the community
-
MariHut joined the community
-
KarlKlingensmith joined the community
-
I am having a similar problem but with my gmail account which incidentally was working fine for several years and now all of a sudden reports as OP. Here are the headers, will appreciate assistance to sort this out. Thank you Delivered-To: XX@gmail.com Received: by 2002:a02:2e2f:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i47-v6csp84720jaa; Tue, 24 Apr 2018 16:45:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZpitjdypWKbv5qiyeBLlfA6pSCiphuJ43r+gpOMo3FD+9950DsCApz4tnf43t5L6H3e2zmM X-Received: by 2002:ac8:2f3b:: with SMTP id j56-v6mr871886qta.224.1524613548510; Tue, 24 Apr 2018 16:45:48 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1524613548; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=WwUUrDt2+12FgTV2wFxSiO7vpR/7Jkt2F/w1JKm6v5FyEeHNoJpQEPxPvYdHnnTFaA jI9fQKWm7/55KFOm3+6SXcDI9Bh8Kb5wdp2faij6bnsERa+CtUPBKfXO0KrFKk7AFthz /9tNRX96KP2EIYeuxfR0m0Px7fDrDDWqCzg0I4lbvpvsLG7g3QjFUd2z29N9+tua2N4y 2iD7pW0MlOIGOjLK40+p/gN5U3Az44XPaWLnlJPWuL9WgCnoYysIvq8Vssy++4+iyF+2 JA4Pfmyx6f3r4xlH9XZK6q7sUBfyUHI4KXg3LBFCkG7dLei8rFdBwKP9DvbBaLHl8xz+ hRyA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=message-id:date:to:reply-to:from:subject:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=ZjUjCEsWH2aVC2CGWbHn+L+NhQvwmRNQ8aSeGQSqCYw=; b=ahC8mpr/isXkOo/LMEThmAi8JUivnDOe2tOg9FLv5n+Myd1outW2fIpJvGz6EriVYr jdnrEHy1QANczVXlR2hDxwz9tJHTPaJQjBDmmETBoV90q+ja9vQ5XJyl5S1GhhfB9UpH ZFCDVO5YozzpOfAJ/rEYir96Y4cZF7yfTPlAwtrbBM+TghFHOX7sBlZYxO/rG8AXNT/A wmLc0rNhocjTsbe5LtA7RHQkO6R69m0X+B8DrA/EYqcIv4x0VR1n4T+Km+e8g9K6NKh6 a7zYsWZcqcqg2z/yGUHJeTk16jldRwae/7Fuk6GDbFFBqVOgDB7f/azkqlJ34rEHMApF GsWA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@sendgrid.net header.s=smtpapi header.b=wlibc3GP; spf=pass (google.com: domain of bounces+7434010-9aaf-XX=gmail.com@sendgrid.net designates 167.89.106.6 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bounces+7434010-9aaf-XX=gmail.com@sendgrid.net Return-Path: <bounces+7434010-9aaf-XX=gmail.com@sendgrid.net> Received: from o2.0qt.s2shared.sendgrid.net (o2.0qt.s2shared.sendgrid.net. [167.89.106.6]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q13-v6si1098455qtf.88.2018.04.24.16.45.47 for <XX@gmail.com> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 24 Apr 2018 16:45:48 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of bounces+7434010-9aaf-XX=gmail.com@sendgrid.net designates 167.89.106.6 as permitted sender) client-ip=167.89.106.6; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@sendgrid.net header.s=smtpapi header.b=wlibc3GP; spf=pass (google.com: domain of bounces+7434010-9aaf-XX=gmail.com@sendgrid.net designates 167.89.106.6 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bounces+7434010-9aaf-XX=gmail.com@sendgrid.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sendgrid.net; h=subject:from:reply-to:to:content-type:x-feedback-id; s=smtpapi; bh=uEUq311FzzjnZ6umg9gpfpfu2Dg=; b=wlibc3GPHVgxZiXFHSuOhxfXNV4P3 muuySr0ZIh87TfI54XjKgIqAf0rduuOtFvbl6wnJfnmXKFZmISK3TiNws1f8APJO nLn58+HTko5VTyAKX7qex6PLexZceOjTluxOUg3RZtXMXVoD1cTCxMYy8Xs3hKCR GOoaP3YZpfha5U= Received: by filter0022p3iad2.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0022p3iad2-9528-5ADFC1AA-32 2018-04-24 23:45:46.429937895 +0000 UTC Received: from mailhost.cmla.ens-cachan.fr (31.219.forpsi.net [195.181.219.31]) by ismtpd0001p1lon1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id YXxiAkBsTaSGMNy1Kg3aCg for <XX@gmail.com>; Tue, 24 Apr 2018 23:45:46.039 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1) by inboxpab.com id 5QXRLSF9F64H for <XX@gmail.com>; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 01:45:51 +0200 (envelope-from <return@inboxpab.com>) Subject: Try CBD Gummies for Free! From: "**Healthy Life**" <infos@inboxpab.com> Reply-to: <reply@inboxpab.com> To: XX@gmail.com Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 23:45:46 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="NlnX4eFXH9gn=_?:" Content-Length: 47775 Message-ID: <YXxiAkBsTaSGMNy1Kg3aCg@ismtpd0001p1lon1.sendgrid.net> X-CSA-Complaints: whitelist-complaints@eco.de X-SG-EID: FkxlJR0jYlFrHqvpkIuV3qGpCcN7fYyncIUnqwLukYDG3vQMn/tb2QZRk0VJxezfM2e7LfeRPI3oWo nTHWtq82S3cmoSoo0nnwYiAzjql37ZOzYjJf5jJ8M03ajnxyPrlD4nli/Mg3I5bTbExrJwRJW5vAg0 FpWjVkk3Q+ZSNn387mlJ0/ElhbBjMISnXoCAxJbi0V4RbkjzOheGlRLjtkzxTXrXgc669ztwU2fLQ6 4= X-Feedback-ID: 7434010:8TzWmuLmZR299Hk0OOgPhhVySMtjCGZhA1j7Jtlx/3Y=:8TzWmuLmZR299Hk0OOgPhhVySMtjCGZhA1j7Jtlx/3Y=:SG --NlnX4eFXH9gn=_?: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
-
shgakaad joined the community
-
ddnsfrees joined the community
-
Lunaku joined the community
-
carlocmanis joined the community
-
Thanks for link (but is rubbish 2002:a19:2203:0:0:0:0:0 is not a routable address) but I were getting these forged headers for a while only by reporting them and to Google abuse did they stop. To insert forged headers you simply rename (My Computer) your computer to ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1524487372; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=XvpHCp72Wirsv7guEqaJFpG5lGBXH0XQHx5t2Gb3Ajd9DpIFsuknOCSM2Ab2IntAXQ /qTmP76uAW0RvIBrR8ozGB4RvW5uNm4yKxl1DP8EF6jV+hrquvOb3QlbgXxM/78n6VN2 VgCvX+xQoajpB0yVLs7Vpw2WKvUmj31XUgb6Kv3ekRi482Uf74Worx0ayFVOCbH0C741 fvjaK3qt3qgC3rXA9MKqKxp4vThGXdpZ3KpenR5dh4IDWEttOmEGk5/BfYjkL2AsLJcI /Ab/FozgoKH62Vv8cETDvccVGuppvmus5jdPOY+sk65+CeKC3EPlj/jYQoSeJZNtWTwH QXyA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-unsubscribe:mime-version:subject:message-id:to:reply-to:from :date:dkim-signature:dkim-signature:arc-authentication-results; bh=3XGAO9t72kzYXZEHdxQCEi3LjBUqtSuDzaeNBgzlYXQ=; b=BHg7hIDgobGQ5CqYn9J7c3cd7jlENG6GrHfGZTcNxdZfO5d1iAc63GAQJTQzTUVTsU I/dnjBg3DjaZjKdSEhYSmehaQlBt/xaNZ/SjsP0tBTgpcPFlCC4l4tuB8L+JLB6ucOQT 2OSHWAWe3UmzZ3lGCUT/Q1+EEF9p17GunwrtNh041niEvnkzGODBE5bE/gSBGmB002Dh UeaVaK9x3LwcVSy8hzWlN4hsmPj+quFINVnjzIdXpHSg8I0ZcOyYKI3Lhil4ZtZpbOcg NzYn6QsmAe7Q8NtneNOPkX+2DlOe4PuYv+Lcz32n1RSWw+4h1fICiWUE+Q7edR0OHuJZ c8KQ== something like that?
-
While these problems may be related, I have been seeing this behavior for a while, and the spam does not show up as being from me. I don't see how a spammer could insert fake header lines at the top of a mail message. This appears to be a SpamCop parsing problem, caused by a change in how Gmail is handling mail. I have tried another message, trimming the top two header lines off, as you have done, and SpamCop parses it correctly. (Thank you.) However, as an experiment, I tried feeding the unadulterated headers to Google's tool: https://toolbox.googleapps.com/apps/messageheader/ (It did not choke.)
- Yesterday
-
The headers are faked by spammer Gmail has a problem, the top fake headers need removing Delivered-To: x Received: by 2002:a19:2203:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i3-v6csp3807840lfi; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 05:42:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZouH9uRREqqQY6Qz0qd656nSgVYRkNeZiYTX86AabWnCx2ioL9i5Pdbw/FTvtjnCec0Ah6G X-Received: by 10.55.65.21 with SMTP id o21mr21204190qka.98.1524487372373; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 05:42:52 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1524487372; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=XvpHCp72Wirsv7guEqaJFpG5lGBXH0XQHx5t2Gb3Ajd9DpIFsuknOCSM2Ab2IntAXQ /qTmP76uAW0RvIBrR8ozGB4RvW5uNm4yKxl1DP8EF6jV+hrquvOb3QlbgXxM/78n6VN2 VgCvX+xQoajpB0yVLs7Vpw2WKvUmj31XUgb6Kv3ekRi482Uf74Worx0ayFVOCbH0C741 fvjaK3qt3qgC3rXA9MKqKxp4vThGXdpZ3KpenR5dh4IDWEttOmEGk5/BfYjkL2AsLJcI /Ab/FozgoKH62Vv8cETDvccVGuppvmus5jdPOY+sk65+CeKC3EPlj/jYQoSeJZNtWTwH QXyA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-unsubscribe:mime-version:subject:message-id:to:reply-to:from :date:dkim-signature:dkim-signature:arc-authentication-results; bh=3XGAO9t72kzYXZEHdxQCEi3LjBUqtSuDzaeNBgzlYXQ=; b=BHg7hIDgobGQ5CqYn9J7c3cd7jlENG6GrHfGZTcNxdZfO5d1iAc63GAQJTQzTUVTsU I/dnjBg3DjaZjKdSEhYSmehaQlBt/xaNZ/SjsP0tBTgpcPFlCC4l4tuB8L+JLB6ucOQT 2OSHWAWe3UmzZ3lGCUT/Q1+EEF9p17GunwrtNh041niEvnkzGODBE5bE/gSBGmB002Dh UeaVaK9x3LwcVSy8hzWlN4hsmPj+quFINVnjzIdXpHSg8I0ZcOyYKI3Lhil4ZtZpbOcg NzYn6QsmAe7Q8NtneNOPkX+2DlOe4PuYv+Lcz32n1RSWw+4h1fICiWUE+Q7edR0OHuJZ c8KQ== once done it parses OK. the fake headers need to be put in "notes" if reported the spam stops was happening to me also send to gmail abuse https://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z6461173975zb86c716f56397882d476e60f06009a9dz The network seems operated by criminal black-hat scumbags! https://www.spamcop.net/w3m?action=checkblock&ip=199.15.213.67 Other hosts in this "neighborhood" with spam reports 199.15.212.72 199.15.212.75 199.15.212.136 199.15.212.201 199.15.213.50 199.15.213.51 199.15.213.52 199.15.213.54 199.15.213.55 199.15.213.64 199.15.213.65199.15.213.69 199.15.213.90 199.15.213.92 199.15.213.112 199.15.213.118 199.15.213.121 199.15.213.125 199.15.213.132 199.15.213.139 199.15.213.140 199.15.213.175199.15.213.183 199.15.214.3 199.15.214.37 199.15.214.42 199.15.214.45 199.15.214.46 199.15.214.47 199.15.214.48 199.15.214.49
-
The only way to get these listings on the spamcop black is to have actual spam reported by mutliple folks around the world. That said, there are a few things you can check to make sure the spam is not coming from those IP addresses. I believe you have already checked the logs on your mail server. Next you can check for weird activity on those servers, such as malware or viruses. After that, you can check your router and for rouge network traffic. A packet capture utility such as wireshark can be helpful to finding the problem. As for checking the router, I have had some spam come directly from the spamcop IPs before and it turned out that someone had hacked into the router. When folks are accessing the router directly, it is possible that they could spoof your IPs. Also, if these are shared IPs (DHCP) you might want to watch out for that.
-
MP sent.
-
Have you looked at SpamCop.net - IP Space Map? That will provide some information as to why your IP addresses are being listed. You or your ISP should also be receiving "spam Reports" from SpamCop. These reports will include the spam reported to SpamCop which should help you identify the reason your IPs are being listed. Also have you entered you IP at SpamCop.net - Blocking List ? There are also links on that page which may be helpful. After checking these references you still have questions post them here. Members of this user-to-user group will try to help you solve your issues.
-
I cannot count the number of times I have “added” all of my addresses.
-
Have you looked at your Mailhost lately? Looks like your ISP may have changed configuration so that the IP 2002:a19:2203:0:0:0:0:0 is now in your received path. Login to spamcop.net and click on the <mailhost> tab
-
Bonjour, Je m'occupe de la plateforme d'email de ma société. J'ai deux adresses ip XXXX et YYYY. Tous les jours j'ai XXXX listée et YYYY délistée, puis le lendemain XXXX délistée et YYYY listée Je ne vois pas de raisons particulières a ces listages délistages. Spamcop est la seule liste qui me pose des problèmes. Avez vous une idée de ce que je dois faire pour sortir de cette situation. Cordialement. ------------------- Hello, I take care of the email platform of my company. I have two IP addresses XXXX and YYYY. Every day I have XXXX listed and YYYY delisted, then the next day XXXX delisted and YYYY listed I do not see any particular reasons for these lists delistings. Spamcop is the only list that causes me problems. Do you have an idea of what I need to do to get out of this situation? Cordially.
-
Check your sent mail there is was a problem with Gmail https://news.google.com/news/story/dU3PtG5ZecqtanM2Dctcba56KqrVM?ned=us&hl=en&gl=US
- Last week
-
SpamCop v 4.9.0 © 2018 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Here is your TRACKING URL - it may be saved for future reference: https://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z6460902591ze58866bb7d3b017ceab1bc1dc060e36az Mailhost configuration problem, identified internal IP as source Mailhost: Please correct this situation - register every email address where you receive spam No source IP address found, cannot proceed. Add/edit your mailhost configuration Finding full email headers Submitting spam via email (may work better) Example: What spam headers should look like Nothing to do.
-
No source IP address found, cannot proceed.
Lking replied to A Norcross's topic in SpamCop Reporting Help
Norcross, Thanks for the update. -
No source IP address found, cannot proceed.
A Norcross replied to A Norcross's topic in SpamCop Reporting Help
For anyone else struggling to configure postfix, check your main.cf for the following line; header_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/header_checks and check the file it references. You can tune how postfix handles the headers as it processes incoming mail either by 1. modifying the file or 2. commenting out the line so that no header checks are performed. Restart postfix for the changes to take effect. Take a look at this handy page for more information regarding header checking; https://posluns.com/guides/header-removal/ -
It's a phishing scam I have got these on occasions. Make sure you have a WORKING malware/virus program going. Windows defender is a good one, Run a scan. Most Network operators are brainless, if you sent a SpamCop tracking URL you might get better advice
-
1. When you receive a credible threat of blackmail you should contact your local law enforcement. As for your submission to SpamCop, by providing the Tracking URL here the rest of us could see the results and be in a better position to explain the results. After you compete the processing of a submitted spam and then go back to the report using the Tracking URL, the screen will state that your reports have already been sent. " I tried some help pages " The software used for the forum was updated/change sometime ago, and during the database conversion, many of the help pages/links to help pages were broken. " I have a report ID " The report ID a number, in a reference to the specific report and is useful only to you and SpamCop. " use of my tracking URL " When you, or anyone else, follows the Tracking URL they can see 1) the original spam (which has been scrubbed so we can not see your email address), 2) the steps taken by the parser to identify where to send the Spam Report, and 3) What actions were taken. When you first submit a spam for processing, you will see 1) and 2) above followed by where reports will be send when you click <Send Reports> When you go back using the Tracking URL, you will see 1) & 2) followed by what was done. Sometimes much later, if the tables of abuse addresses has been updated the parser will report " If reported today, reports would be sent to: " to reflect the updated data. "Should I expect to hear anything else about this in response? " No. The only thing SpamCop does is, based on their rules, add the senders IP address to the SC block list (SCBL). Depending on how many reports SC receives the IP address may be on the SCBL for 12 hrs or longer. You can go to https://www.spamcop.net/w3m?action=map check the reputation of the IP address and if it is currently on any block list. " it would be nice to think that there could potentially be serious consequences " SpamCop does not have any authority to do anything except maintain their SCBL. That is why you should contact your local authorities. Welcome to the spam fight.
-
Yesterday, I reported a spam message I received that included blackmail. I.e. I was asked to supply money to a bitcoin address to prevent information on my "sexual preferences" being sent to my friends, etc. I'm not worried about the threat because these "preferences" are news to me and nothing (that's real) exists that could cause me any embarrassment, but I found this annoying enough to find spamcop and want to fight back. I've sent a report but I'm afraid a lot of the terminology used here is too advanced for my limited computer knowledge, so please forgive my 'idiot' questions. I tried some help pages that brought up captions saying the pages no longer exist! I have a report ID and it seems details have been sent to: abuse@hostingperte.it but use of my tracking URL causes me to see the words "Reports regarding this spam have already been sent". Does this mean that the administrator of the network where the email originates has received other reports of exactly the same spam, as well as receiving my report? Should I expect to hear anything else about this in response? If not, is there any way that I can discover whether any action has been taken? In view of the blackmail element, it would be nice to think that there could potentially be serious consequences for the perpetrator but I suppose that's a lot to hope for? I'd be very grateful for any reply that helps clarify these points!
-
No source IP address found, cannot proceed.
Lking replied to A Norcross's topic in SpamCop Reporting Help
Perhaps someone at postfix or a postfix user group can help you configure the tool/app. Postfix needs to be configured so that it does not removed the existing header "Received:" lines. With that information the SC parser can trace the email's path back to the source, checking as it goes. Without the unaltered information, humans nor tools will be able to identify a valid spam source. -
No source IP address found, cannot proceed.
A Norcross replied to A Norcross's topic in SpamCop Reporting Help
I am the email provider, that's why I am looking for assistance getting postfix to provide the correct information to spamcop. -
Thank but I got answered for my question ############## Thank you for your query. The email that you have forwarded to me@rescam.org could have been processing. The email that you received is an automated email from Re:Scam. It is just an email notifying you that your request is in progress and Re:Scam will take it from here and respond to the scammer if it identifies the email as a phishing scam mail. There's no need for you to do anything from now. If you'd like to unsubscribe mails from Re:Scam, kindly click on the 'Unsubscribe' button. Thank you. Kind regards, Tat / Contact Centre Consultant / Netsafe / 0508 638 723 / www.netsafe.org.nz
-
No source IP address found, cannot proceed.
petzl replied to A Norcross's topic in SpamCop Reporting Help
Ask your email provider -
No source IP address found, cannot proceed.
A Norcross replied to A Norcross's topic in SpamCop Reporting Help
This is a mail server hosted in a data centre with it's own IPv4 and IPv6 address. It is the only destination address for the MX records. As I said in the original post, it's running postfix/dovecot/spamassassin/pyzor/postgrey/opendkim/amavis. How are my headers being stripped before they reach the server ? -
No source IP address found, cannot proceed.
petzl replied to A Norcross's topic in SpamCop Reporting Help
All of those IP's are not routeable IP address's. You have some "network box" receiving your email removing headers then sending to you -
No source IP address found, cannot proceed.
A Norcross replied to A Norcross's topic in SpamCop Reporting Help
Below is the header of the example mail I'm trying to submit, which looks very similar to mail received from other hosts. If something is routinely removed from the header by my mailserver, as the admin of the mail server I'd like to learn how to configure the host correctly - hence the question. Return-Path: <bounce-860-20822324-860-248@1pr.top> Delivered-To: X@X.co.uk Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by expertgeeks.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7AD92B61824 for <X@X.co.uk>; Sun, 22 Apr 2018 06:02:01 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at expertgeeks.co.uk X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 4.531 X-Spam-Level: **** X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.531 tagged_above=-9999 required=6.31 tests=[HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_02=0.805, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG=0.635, MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.105, NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP=0.001, NO_RECEIVED=-0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, PYZOR_CHECK=1.985, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from expertgeeks.co.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (expertgeeks.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QVbxaIVs0570 for <X@X.co.uk>; Sun, 22 Apr 2018 06:01:59 +0100 (BST) Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=111.231.204.195; helo=1pr.top; envelope-from=bounce-860-20822324-860-248@1pr.top; receiver=X@X.co.uk X-Greylist: delayed 1228 seconds by postgrey-1.35 at expertgeeks.co.uk; Sun, 22 Apr 2018 06:01:58 BST Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2018 12:41:07 +0800 To: "X@X.co.uk" <X@X.co.uk> From: Martine Parent <Martine_Parent@1pr.top> Reply-to: Martine Parent <Martine_Parent@1pr.top> Subject: I Wish I Were a Pandora outlet Weiner. Message-ID: <b7715d1d2b43e8c546395af66baa035d@172.27.0.16> X-Priority: 3 X-MessageID: NHx8fHwxMDIwNzB8fHx8ZXhwZXJ0Z2Vla3NAZXhwZXJ0Z2Vla3MuY28udWt8fHx8NHx8fHwxfHx8fDA%3D MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" -
Check your sent mail there is was a problem with Gmail https://news.google.com/news/story/dU3PtG5ZecqtanM2Dctcba56KqrVM?ned=us&hl=en&gl=US
