Jump to content

Routing / Report Address Issues

Problems with Parser output results, such as No Reporting Address Found, wrong address provided and a Refresh Cache doesn't fix it.
Note that only Deputies can actually 'fix' the parsing results.

1,704 topics in this forum

  1. [Resolved] Using abuse#eircom.ie[at]devnull.spamcop.net for statistical tracking.

    By Snowbat,
    • 3 replies
    • 2,399 views

  2. [Resolved] Using abuse#limestonenetworks.com[at]devnull.spamcop.net for statistical tracking.

    By Snowbat,
    • 3 replies
    • 2,295 views

  3. [Resolved] Using abuse#live.com[at]devnull.spamcop.net for statistical tracking

    By JoeColorado,
    • 1 reply
    • 797 views

  4. [Resolved] Using gmail-abuse#google.com[at]devnull.spamcop.net for statistical tracking

    By JoeColorado,
    • 1 reply
    • 1,327 views

  5. [Resolved] Using inetadmin#alestra.net.mx[at]devnull.spamcop.net for statistical tracking.

    By JoeColorado,
    • 1 reply
    • 1,341 views

  6. [Resolved] Using postmaster#hdsc.com[at]devnull.spamcop.net for statistical tracking.

    By mrmaxx,
    • 1 reply
    • 710 views

  7. [Resolved] Using postmaster#hostpapasupport.com[at]devnull.spamcop.net for statistical tracking.

    By mrmaxx,
    • 4 replies
    • 1,300 views

  8. [Resolved] Using postmaster#xserver.co.jp[at]devnull.spamcop.net

    By mrmaxx,
    • 1 reply
    • 1,908 views

  9. [Resolved] whois: 213.140.59.0 - 213.140.59.255 = abuse.tgsolutions[at]telefonica.com

    By Richard7310,
    • 1 reply
    • 1,127 views

  10. /dev/null'ing report for nomaster@devnull.spamcop.net

    By scottbomb,   
    • 5 replies
    • 6,623 views

  11. % Abuse contact for '185.8.164.0 - 185.8.164.255' is 'pavel.snajdr[at]vpsfree.cz'

    By dtz,
    • 0 replies
    • 446 views

  12. % Abuse contact for '217.196.134.0 - 217.196.135.255' is 'lir[at]irpinianetcom.it'

    By A B,
    • 0 replies
    • 402 views

  13. % Abuse contact for '31.42.160.0 - 31.42.191.255' is 'alexnvis[at]gmail.com'

    By A B,
    • 0 replies
    • 710 views

  14. % Abuse contact for '62.22.99.0 - 62.22.99.255' is 'abuse[at]es.verizon.com'

    By Snowbat,
    • 0 replies
    • 691 views

  15. % Abuse contact for '95.38.81.0 - 95.38.82.255' is 'ripe-manager[at]fanavadc.com'

    By A B,
    • 0 replies
    • 388 views

  16. % Information related to '27.121.88.0 - 27.121.91.255' abuse[at]cloudplus.net.au

    By A B,
    • 0 replies
    • 330 views

  17. 101.0.16.152 -> postmaster[at]m-idc.biz bounces

    By shirayuki,
    • 0 replies
    • 597 views

  18. 103.245.19.202

    By C2H5OH,
    • 0 replies
    • 198 views

  19. 103.30.62.32 - 103.30.62.61

    By shirayuki,
    • 0 replies
    • 783 views

  20. 105.158.0.0/16 - Abuse address is nocmt[at]menara.ma

    By A B,
    • 0 replies
    • 1,213 views

  21. 109.116.0.0 - 109.117.255.255 is email masked ripe lookup requiring -B

    By Snowbat,
    • 0 replies
    • 1,294 views

  22. 113.196.78.196 -> IDCService[at]fareastone.com.tw

    By shirayuki,
    • 0 replies
    • 603 views

  23. 114.96.0.0 - 114.103.255.255 > ahdata[at]189.cn

    By Snowbat,
    • 0 replies
    • 5,378 views

  24. 115.86.0.0 - 115.86.255.255: Query should be directed to KRNIC

    By A B,
    • 0 replies
    • 325 views

  25. 118.103.0.0/17 -> abuse[at]ultina.softbanktelecom.co.jp

    By shirayuki,
    • 0 replies
    • 778 views
×