Jump to content

Routing / Report Address Issues

Problems with Parser output results, such as No Reporting Address Found, wrong address provided and a Refresh Cache doesn't fix it.
Note that only Deputies can actually 'fix' the parsing results.

1,701 topics in this forum

  1. [Resolved] Abuse contact for '194.165.26.0 - 194.165.27.255' is 'tiger.net.abuse[at]gmail.com'

    By Snowbat,
    • 4 replies
    • 926 views

  2. [Resolved] Abuse contact for '194.58.96.0 - 194.58.99.255' is 'abuse[at]reg.ru'

    By dtz,
    • 1 reply
    • 506 views

  3. [Resolved] Abuse contact for '195.208.164.0 - 195.208.167.255' is 'sva[at]enertel.ru'

    By A B,
    • 1 reply
    • 532 views

  4. [Resolved] Abuse contact for '217.149.176.0 - 217.149.179.255' is 'noc[at]unico.com.ru'

    By Farelf,
    • 1 reply
    • 1,947 views

  5. [Resolved] Abuse contact for '37.131.208.0 - 37.131.215.255' is 'boss[at]interra.ru'

    By A B,
    • 1 reply
    • 606 views

  6. [Resolved] Abuse contact for '37.23.0.0 - 37.23.127.255' is 'ripe[at]rt.ru'

    By A B,
    • 1 reply
    • 716 views

  7. [Resolved] Abuse contact for '62.213.11.104 - 62.213.11.111' is 'ripe[at]rt.ru'

    By dtz,
    • 1 reply
    • 505 views

  8. [Resolved] Abuse contact for '82.96.70.0 - 82.96.70.255' is 'abuse[at]probe-networks.de'

    By dtz,
    • 1 reply
    • 562 views

  9. [Resolved] Abuse contact for '84.16.145.0 - 84.16.159.255' is 'noc[at]startel.ru'

    By A B,
    • 1 reply
    • 529 views

  10. [Resolved] Abuse contact for '84.18.96.0 - 84.18.127.255' is 'adm-group[at]tattelecom.ru'

    By A B,
    • 1 reply
    • 731 views

  11. [Resolved] Abuse contact for '84.22.98.0 - 84.22.98.255' is 'abuse[at]tilaa.net'

    By dtz,
    • 1 reply
    • 540 views

  12. [Resolved] Abuse contact for '87.251.170.0 - 87.251.170.255' is 'alex[at]ural.net'

    By A B,
    • 1 reply
    • 517 views

  13. [Resolved] Abuse contact for 103.230.25.190 is stale

    By mslw,
    • 1 reply
    • 654 views

  14. [Resolved] Abuse contact for 178.204.206.193

    By C2H5OH,
    • 1 reply
    • 580 views

  15. [Resolved] Abuse contact for 204.75.142.0 - 204.75.142.255 is abuse[at]campaignmonitor.com

    By AJR,
    • 1 reply
    • 2,504 views

  16. [Resolved] abuse[at]blueconnex.net

    By mrmaxx,
    • 1 reply
    • 664 views

  17. [Resolved] abuse[at]enom.com instead of/or in addition to abuse[at]namecheaphosting.com?

    By Claus,
    • 7 replies
    • 2,183 views

  18. [Resolved] abuse[at]euroweb.com bounces

    By mrmaxx,
    • 1 reply
    • 781 views

  19. [Resolved] abuse[at]fbs.com.tr bounces (6 sent : 6 bounces)

    By mrmaxx,
    • 1 reply
    • 684 views

  20. [Resolved] abuse[at]keyweb.de does not bounce for me

    By dtz,
    • 2 replies
    • 651 views

  21. [Resolved] abuse[at]smtp.com is valid

    By manchot,
    • 5 replies
    • 2,099 views

  22. [Resolved] asahi-net.or.jp

    By mrmaxx,
    • 1 reply
    • 598 views

  23. [Resolved] Bug: routeid:68151363 208.25.96.0 - 208.25.97.255 to:nobody[at]example.com

    By cwg,
    • 2 replies
    • 2,489 views

  24. [Resolved] Can "mail-abuse[ at ]cert.br"

    By petzl,
    • 1 reply
    • 1,599 views

  25. [Resolved] Checck IP 171.100.166.169 seems locked?

    By petzl,
    • 1 reply
    • 1,338 views
×