The primary mode of support here is peer-to-peer, meaning users helping other users. (please remember this at all times!)
Another try:
This forum is composed of people who have used spamcop and those who are learning about anti-spam efforts.
![]() ![]() |
| jimgiles |
Oct 13 2009, 05:28 AM
Post
#1
|
|
Newbie ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2 Joined: 13-October 09 Member No.: 9635 |
Hi All,
I'm a reporter with New Scientist magazine. I'm putting together a piece on the history of spam and am searching for data on historic spam levels. The most comprehensive dataset that I'm aware of is maintained by MAAWG, but it only goes back to 2005 (http://www.maawg.org/about/EMR). Does anyone know of older datasets? I've seen a few that are based on individual email accounts, but I need something a little more rigorous than that. Any tips would be much appreciated! Thanks, Jim |
| rconner |
Oct 13 2009, 11:32 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Advanced Member Group: Memberp Posts: 872 Joined: 23-January 07 From: Maryland, USA Member No.: 7388 |
I occasionally search for the same thing myself, but haven't had much luck. You might find something at the spam Links website (http://spamlinks.net/). You might also Google "spam corpus" referring to the collections of spam used to "train" Bayesian filters etc.
-- rick -------------------- Richard C. Conner, P.E.
http://www.rickconner.net/spamweb/ |
| Farelf |
Oct 14 2009, 02:39 AM
Post
#3
|
|
T-shirt wearing out Group: Membersph Posts: 3871 Joined: 23-February 04 From: Western Australia Member No.: 491 |
The question arises from time to time but unfortunately no-one really knows what they're looking at, in terms of collection methodologies and uncertainties about ISP filtering of various kinds. Assume you saw the topic http://forum.spamcop.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=10332 with its various links? Despite its title and initial direction it goes on to talk about general spam stats. And there are other discussions/topics in these forums - I'm not sure they will help but they may be worth some effort to find them if you're not getting much joy elsewhere.
-------------------- Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose
|
| michaelanglo |
Oct 17 2009, 05:36 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Membera Posts: 157 Joined: 29-January 04 From: michaelanglo in Surrey, England Member No.: 117 |
I'm a reporter with New Scientist magazine. I'm putting together a piece on the history of spam and am searching for data on historic spam levels. The most comprehensive dataset that I'm aware of is maintained by MAAWG, but it only goes back to 2005 (http://www.maawg.org/about/EMR). One bit of lateral thinking that (a) may help ((IMG:style_emoticons/default/cool.gif) interest your readers anyway. would be to look for historic statistics on total email volumes I assume that if the current assertion that 80% of email is spam is indeed true it was lower in the past so we have an upper bound on spam level HTH |
| StevenUnderwood |
Oct 17 2009, 09:21 PM
Post
#5
|
|
What Life? Group: Membersph Posts: 5141 Joined: 20-January 04 From: Whitinsville, MA USA Member No.: 12 |
I'm a reporter with New Scientist magazine. I'm putting together a piece on the history of spam and am searching for data on historic spam levels. The most comprehensive dataset that I'm aware of is maintained by MAAWG, but it only goes back to 2005 (http://www.maawg.org/about/EMR). Does anyone know of older datasets? I've seen a few that are based on individual email accounts, but I need something a little more rigorous than that. Any tips would be much appreciated! You may want to contact a few of the spam blocking services. I have used postini at my last 2 positions and while that do not have historical information available publically, thay may have the numbers if you ask. -------------------- Steven P. Underwood, DNRC
Whitinsville, MA underwood+forum[at]spamcop.net -No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.- |
| dra007 |
Oct 18 2009, 12:09 PM
Post
#6
|
|
Been There Group: Memberp Posts: 1413 Joined: 18-March 04 Member No.: 777 |
Even services like McAfee and Norton antivirus keep track of some spam data since some botnets and phishers are directly linked to the spam flow...
good luck in your research and do come back with what you find, I used to be an avid reader of you magazine in my younger years.. This post has been edited by dra007: Oct 18 2009, 12:11 PM |
| jimgiles |
Oct 26 2009, 10:55 AM
Post
#7
|
|
Newbie ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2 Joined: 13-October 09 Member No.: 9635 |
Thanks all for the suggestions. I'll check out the links. The spam filtering companies are telling me that they only have data going back to 04/05, so I'm still on the look out for older stats. I'll post a link to the story when it appears.
Cheers Jim |
| kmolloy |
Oct 26 2009, 11:16 AM
Post
#8
|
|
Newbie Group: SpamCop Staff Posts: 6 Joined: 13-February 07 Member No.: 7476 |
Thanks all for the suggestions. I'll check out the links. The spam filtering companies are telling me that they only have data going back to 04/05, so I'm still on the look out for older stats. I'll post a link to the story when it appears. Would news.admin.net-abuse.sightings be of any help? That goes back to the late '90s. |
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 22nd November 2009 - 05:38 AM |