QUOTE
I am sorry to bother you with my computer woes, but I need some confirmation - since I am not at all confident on what the problem is and don't really know anyone here that I trust to give me good advice.
And to make sure you get good advice, I'm putting this "out there" so that even what I say can be challenged by someone with a better idea <g>
QUOTE
For a while, OE, Mozilla seem to take forever to start up. I put it down to McAfee doing its thing. Also, lately I have had to open Mozilla when I am offline or there is a pop up that wants me to do a survey about Netscape which crashes Mozilla. No viruses lately or anything else strange.
Item 1 - the anti-vius checking thing. First guess is that your anto-virus tool is set to "check files when they are run/opened" ... For some people, this is a good thing, example: those that click on those attachment to see what they are/do ... If you are the type that handles things in a more secure fashion (example: save that attachment somewhere else, do your virus scan on that saved file, then maybe take a look at it) .. you don't download and run all kinds of files found in strange places on the net, etc., this is one of those things that just gets in the way. In fact, when installing new software, the warning that pops up about making sure nothing else is running is primarily based on anti-virus tools running with the "check when file is run/opened mode" .. the interference caused by all the scanning/checking usually tends to muck up the installation.
The Mozilla pop-up .. don't use that application, but ... one of the first things when talking about a pop-up ... java scri_pt is usually involved, which has little touches all over the place .. for exampe, what restrictions might you have on running java scri_pt/activeX things under Windows? There are settings under FireFox, so I'd assume they were available under Mozilla also as to restrictions/allowances on running these things ... both javascrpt and pop-ups ... (more later)
QUOTE
Then, Sunday, before I even opened internet programs, I tried entering something in Access and it crashed. The scan disk thing got hung up when the computer restarted. So I went to safemode and did a thorough scandisk, then defrag, but when I started up this morning half the short cut icons on the desktop are just the place icons (though they still work).
Assumption on a 'recent' version of Offic/Access involved ... that's a pretty hefty application .. a crash there would not be considered out the ordinary, unfortunately .. way to many things to pick out a possibility from this limited data ... (however, more later)
Icons issue: Windows has a default "space" set aside to handle icons. If you load up your desktop with shortcuts, have your system tray full of applications, the Quick-start section all loaded up, there is the likelyhood that this space has been exceeded .... and/or the (hidden system) file C:/Windows/ShellIconCache has been scrambled. One thing to try to bring them back ... Start | Settings | Control Panel | Display | Appearance .... select "icon" in one drop-down menu ... you'll typically see the size setting at (I'll say) 32 .. change that number, Apply ... change it back to what it was, Apply again .... see if this forced refresh of this file brought the icons back.
If this doesn't work, then try renaming (or deleting) that file and re-boot ... which will cause a new one to be built fresh. (windows default install won't let you 'see' this file, however Start | Find | Files and Folders should bring it up in that window where you can then "do something" with it)
To simplify this in the future, Microsoft has (had?) an app TWEAKUI that has a repair function built in that basically does this automaticly without having to re-boot ... this tool isn't "supported" ... but I use it <g>
If the issue is too many icons, I can post a hack to the Registry that increases the "space" alloted to hold more icons ....
QUOTE
I looked at the stats: Windows has 195,872 KB of memory (which seems low to me). With Mozilla up, I have 59% system resources. Disk space when I look at Windows Explorer says 25.6 GB available.
Suggesting that your computer (probably) has 256Meg or RAM installed. Depending on how you actually use that computer, a lot of folks live with that on a Win-98 machine. Again, depending o how you use it, throwing more memory in may either nock your socks off at the improvement or you may not notice a thing (well, disk thrashing would be reduced for sure) ....
Anything to make the customer (feel) happy. Back in the days of Win 3.x ... things like that displaye RAM and Resources were based on the maximum amout of Memory installed ... of course, by the time Windows loaded, all the Office stuff (in default mode) and any other software that used the "preload during boot so that when the user clicks on the icon, it starts up 'really' fast" .. the displayed numbers were really, really low ... That was "fixed" in later versios of Windows, such the 100% number was calculated on the amount of memory left over "after" Windows loaded ... so what used to be 15% available now displayed as 78%, because of the difference in the "baseline" that the number was calculated from ... oe still had exactly the same amount of "free" resources, but people weren't bitching any more <g>
25+Gig of hard drive space could be good for most. It might be a problem for others. Once again, back to how you use that computer, what software is involved, etc. For example, I'm still using ancient software that would refuse to work with that much space thrown at them. The problem is that these humongous hard drives also carry wit them equally humongous sector/cluster sizes, and the old software can't understand those huge numbers coming back, so immediately assumes that the hard drive is totally hosed. I have a number of 2.1Gig partitions set up for those applications.
There are still some issues with how many files are stored in a "root" folder/partition ... One may have all inds of drive space available, but there's only so much room set aside to hold file names and pointers to where they are actually stored on the hard drive. In theory, Win-98 can handle that issue, but we're back to the applications themselves again .... Usual hint there is to star creating sub-directories/folders as those don't have the same file-name limits ....
QUOTE
We have a new version of QuickBooks (Home and Office version) that has had problems from the get go with open windows (it won't minimize or sometimes if minimized, won't restore).
My gut feeling is that between QuickBooks and Mcaffee - which are both designed for XP and I still have Win98 - that they are screwing up something. And possibly using up all my memory.
My gut feeling is that between QuickBooks and Mcaffee - which are both designed for XP and I still have Win98 - that they are screwing up something. And possibly using up all my memory.
There's "designed for" .. "designed with xxx in mind" ... designed to be compatible with" ... and probably some more .... if the package you bought said Compatible with Win-XP and that's it, be amazed that it loaded and runs at all .... If it said Compatible wirh XP, 98SE, 98, xxx then technically it should recognize which OS you're running and not install (in ths case) the XP specific code .... 98 and XP are a whole lot different at the core .. 98 stuff will generally run under XP (some configuration issues, a compatibility mode may need to be set, if it makes some direct-to-hardware calls all bets are off) .. but XP specific stuff will not erun under 98, end of story.
QUOTE
I haven't tried Access again, but Word opened and didn't crash.
However, when I sent an email this morning, the hard drive got really busy for a long time - I am not very observant so I don't know if that was unusual or not or if it was McAfee or Zone Alarm doing something.
However, when I sent an email this morning, the hard drive got really busy for a long time - I am not very observant so I don't know if that was unusual or not or if it was McAfee or Zone Alarm doing something.
There was much talk about the latest release(s) of ZoneAlarm, also going the "one tool that does everything" route and managing to do the same as McAfee, Symantec, etc al ... just sticking too many fingers in too many places and causing problems in all kinds of off the wall places. So once again, we may be back to the version of the applications involved and some of the configuration settings. For example, I use AVG which offers that "check and certify as virus free all outgoing e-mail" ... As I only send out plain-text e-mail, no attachments, there is no reason to have that process running. (systems are checked regularly with an AVG scan from one system, NOD from another, an on-line scan every now and then, etc. etc. .. no need to get into all my security things right now ..) Just going to if you've got these applications set to do this outgoing scanning ...
QUOTE
I am thinking about buying another computer (with USB ports) and networking it with the old one and putting the QuickBooks and the internet stuff on the new one and continue to use the old one for MS Office and, I guess, storage (so I don't have to decide what to delete. It looks to me as though it has plenty of room on the hard disk.)
So, that's where I am. Am I on the right track? Or should I be looking for something else wrong?
So, that's where I am. Am I on the right track? Or should I be looking for something else wrong?
First of all, I'm hoping that the USB ports aren't directly connected to the "networking" part ... though there are USB networking things out there, I'm tired of having to "fix" them .... USB wasn't meant for that, I don't care what the advertising says.
Most definitely get a router (don't have to wait until you get the new computer ... well, if you're still using dial-up, things get a bit funky ..) This will add to your security, make a lot of things easier (once you get over the hurdle of getting the 98 machine to talk to the XP machine anyway)
Now for the "later" part ... the 'typical' thing that might pull all of your crashing, icon, window sizing, etc. stuff together is your video card & video driver. It s possible that installing the newer software also included replacig/updating of some files that aren't quite compatible with either your video hardware, video card drivers and or settings/configuration. And trust me, this is where things get "fun" ....
For starters .. go get, install, and run Belarc Advisor ... this will (attempt) to give you a list of your hardware, your software, version numbers of drivers, etc .... Look at that data, then go on the wild search to see how much of that stuff is "way too old" and look at updating some of it ...
Now the next step for the folks that I directly is that about now is when they usually decide to talk about how their computer is going to end up in my hands <g> After that exercise, their system will have a copy of VNC installed, such that the next time an issue comes up, they can run that app, pass me the specifics on connection details, and I can "look" at their system from here.
Here's hoping something in here gets you to a good place <g>
