QUOTE(StevenUnderwood @ Apr 25 2007, 01:50 PM)

This and many other mailhost questions have already been answered in our FAQ which is linked at the top of every page here (· SPAMCOP FAQ ·).
SpamCop Parsing and Reporting Service section.
The specific entries you would want to check out:
How do I configure Mailhosts for SpamCop?
-----> Mailhost System Configuration Explanation
-----> MailHost Configuration Problems FAQ started
-----> Mailhosts Typical Questions A less technical version
-----> One version of a Step-by-step MailHost set-up
-----> "Sorry, confirmation codes do not match:" - Why?
Thanks. This did help some. I'm still confused, so please bear with me.
Like I said, I own a domain and have a few dozen aliases that all go to my one main address. I also have a couple of other external (to me) addresses that forward to my main address. So my understanding of the topology I should be using is as follows:
M == my Main address
A(i) == my various aliases on my own domain
E(j) j = 1..2 == my two external addresses that forward to M
A(1) A(2) A(3) ...A(N-2) A(N-1) A(N) E(1) E(2)
| | | | | | | |
--------------------+-----------------------------------
|
M
(I know this doesn't display right, but the idea is all the A's and all the E's sit onto of and feed into M.)
I have gone ahead and processed 6 of the A addrs and both of the E addrs after M. Now when I look at my mailhost config to add a new host, it doesn't show all of the addresses I set. It only shows hosts. It seems like it has seen enough of the local addresses. Can I assume this is ok?
Also, the display of the configuration allows me to select from a pulldown of alternate hostnames and/or ip addresses that are a part of the equation. Can I assume this is for display purposes and not for effecting changes in settings?