I can understand this behaviour where the postmaster or abuse addresses bounce the complaints.
Here the reason seems to be quite different and a bit historical::
http://www.spamcop.net/sc?action=showroute...typecodes=21,16 says that
QUOTE
Reports routes for 66.63.168.79:
routeid:12908238 66.63.160.0 - 66.63.191.255 to:oc3[at]devnull.spamcop.net
Administrator interested in all reports
samedi 15 janvier 2005 14:43:10 +0100
[Note added by 216.127.43.94 (sam.julianhaight.com)]
oc3
SBL12057 - ROKSO
SBL19215- ROKSO
routeid:12924675 66.63.160.0 - 66.63.175.255 to:oc3[at]devnull.spamcop.net
Administrator interested in all reports
lundi 17 janvier 2005 1:10:54 +0100
[Note added by 216.127.43.94 (sam.julianhaight.com)]
AS29761 -->11641-->701
oc3-->intuit-->mci
routeid:12908238 66.63.160.0 - 66.63.191.255 to:oc3[at]devnull.spamcop.net
Administrator interested in all reports
samedi 15 janvier 2005 14:43:10 +0100
[Note added by 216.127.43.94 (sam.julianhaight.com)]
oc3
SBL12057 - ROKSO
SBL19215- ROKSO
routeid:12924675 66.63.160.0 - 66.63.175.255 to:oc3[at]devnull.spamcop.net
Administrator interested in all reports
lundi 17 janvier 2005 1:10:54 +0100
[Note added by 216.127.43.94 (sam.julianhaight.com)]
AS29761 -->11641-->701
oc3-->intuit-->mci
So, is there still a good reason no to send them the reports they merit ?
Regards,
Frederic
