lartingyou Posted August 30, 2015 Share Posted August 30, 2015 I got a spam this morning, and when I tried to report it, it said netops-ironport[at]cisco.com was the address... but, in the end it just bounces. That is ironic, no? From https://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z6154803852zb0fee552131aa619c626149cecf5f2f0z Finding IP block owner:Routing details for 68.232.140.118[refresh/show] Cached whois for 68.232.140.118 : netops-ironport[at]cisco.comUsing abuse net on netops-ironport[at]cisco.comabuse net cisco.com = abuse[at]cisco.comUsing best contacts abuse[at]cisco.comabuse[at]cisco.com redirects to cesadmins[at]cisco.comcesadmins[at]cisco.com bounces (475 sent : 238 bounces)Sorry, no reporting addresses found for 68.232.140.118. Nothing to do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turetzsr Posted August 31, 2015 Share Posted August 31, 2015 I got a spam this morning, and when I tried to report it, it said netops-ironport[at]cisco.com was the address... but, in the end it just bounces. That is ironic, no?       Maybe ironic that Cisco is "spamming" you but certainly not that SpamCop won't report Cisco as a spammer! <g> <snip> abuse[at]cisco.com redirects to cesadmins[at]cisco.com cesadmins[at]cisco.com bounces (475 sent : 238 bounces) <snip>        CES was the outfit that used to provide the now-defunct "SpamCop" e-mail service; I am surprised at the apparent continued relationship between CES and Cisco! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.