Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates     

  1. Today
  2. Hey RadicalDad, Addressing: 34.216.216.33 "parser properly recognizing Sparkpost was the source of the email. But then Spamcop decided amazonaws was the correct reporting address" https://www.talosintelligence.com/reputation_center/lookup?search=34.216.216.33 Cheers G🦗H
  3. Yesterday
  4. Hey Hank, I parsed the spam using an account without Mailhosts https://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z6549475009zed08ca727fef033d7a7791ddc92d5159z Cheers! G🦗H
  5. Can someone help me figure this out? https://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z6549455694zfeb75193b1712788142a5546e2c495dbz Mailhost configuration problem, identified internal IP as source Mailhost: Please correct this situation - register every email address where you receive spam No source IP address found, cannot proceed. Add/edit your mailhost configuration ... I've read the previous threads about this and tried the suggestion to create a new mailhost entry but still gettimg spammed from one source that always has this problem being reported
  6. RadicalDad

    Spamcop no longer works with Outlook/Exchange

    As the OP on this thread, which is now over two years old, I'm underwhelmed by the responses. To be clear, I'm appreciative of everyone who has responded, and respectful of the time and intellect expended by those who tried to find a way to make the parser work. However, at the end of the day, it is the Spamcop devs who need to fix this problem, and if they even exist anymore, they are nowhere to be found. They certainly aren't active on this forum. Indeed, it seems the lights were long ago turned off over there. As for the advice to try removing the first Received line, that didn't work. I tried that, and also removing the first 2 Received lines, then the first 3 Received lines, and finally all lines which referenced my email host in any way. That last trick worked, with the parser properly recognizing that Sparkpost was the source of the email. But then Spamcop decided amazonaws was the correct reporting address and all reports for amazonaws are devnulled. Here is a link for anyone who wants to look. https://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z6549409030zca1b5ca2a3591ef1dad9030579e84550z By the time I find and delete all the references to my mail host's server farm, especially when Spamcop incorrectly redirects the spam report and then devnulls it, I'm better off just complaining directly. Spamcop has become useless. No doubt Julian Haight is crying in his beer.
  7. MIG

    FaceBook and spam

    Got it Master, Thank you! Give feedback on this post: Excellent! Cheers! G🦗H
  8. MIG

    FaceBook and spam

    Hello Master, Still awake? Thanks for the update! Windows/FF, me too. Scam & Fake pages, all good, except, another selection must be made for Send to work🤔 I'll try a couple of other browsers & post back. G🦗H really wants to do this, get so little spam these days it makes me grumpy😡 Gunna chk the difference b/w "give feedback on this post" & "give feedback on this page" Cheers! G🦗H
  9. Lking

    FaceBook and spam

    I don't know could be a difference in browsers. When with Windows/FireFox I look at a FB post I see 3 dots in the upper right corner of the post. Clicking on those and I get a drop down menu that includes <Give Feedback on this post> Then I get Then I click on the <spam> button. <Scam & Fake pages> could be just as good. In either case someone there will look at it and dump the trash
  10. MIG

    FaceBook and spam

    Hello Master, you have that title for a reason🙇! Followup question: "report page as spam" Which options do you choose please? "Scams & Fake pages" & then ? Thanks for sharing and cheers! G🦗H
  11. Last week
  12. Lking

    FaceBook and spam

    When I got back from my road trip last week (hours alone with little to do but think) I started reporting to Facebook links in forum spam here. And it has an impact! If you get here before I do in the morning you may have noticed some of the forum spam includes a link to a Facebook page i.e. "https:/ /facebook,com/somepage/1234567899" or the like. I login to FB, and past the link into my browser. On the spammer's FB page there is a "Feedback" option so I report the page as spam. Never going back I had no idea if it had an effect Today there were two FB links to the same page. I reported the first one and when I went back the second time several minutes later, the page was " currently not available"!!! I feel good today.
  13. Hello Rajasekar.svel, We happy to help. Hope you get the answers! Cheers G🦗H
  14. Rajasekar.svel

    reports disabled for abuse at zohocorp.com

    Thank you very much for the reply. I've raised the request over there.
  15. Hello Rajasekar.svel, I've just answered your other post, so I'll answer this here as it's clearer what's required. It might be best to send thru a request to SpamCop Admin, the following link/page: https://www.spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/401.html How can I contact a SpamCop representative, at the very bottom of the page: "Other reasons for contact", briefly explain what you've posted here, I'm sure the SpamCop Admins will assist. Cheers G🦗H
  16. Well, there you go, just removed the top two [ Received: etc ] hops & the spam parsed just fine, so, G🦗H wrong, apologies Rajasekar.svel, your (remove first two [ Received: etc ]) method is correct. Removing (first one [ Received: etc ] ) also results in a true parse. Cheers! G🦗H
  17. Hey Rajasekar.svel, Without a working tracking URL it's a little difficult to offer commentary, however, are you posting that you've had a positive result from Zoho Abuse Monitoring Desk? In which case super! If I've misunderstood, please post a working SC tracking URL? Also, just for accuracy, SCA advise: remove the 1st/first [ Received: etc to +0000] It may well be that removing the top two [ Received: etc ] is also effective, but (imo) I don't think so, I'll test this method & post back. Cheers! G🦗H
  18. Dear SC, I'm from Zoho Abuse Monitoring Desk. Recently one or two users report to me that they cannot report to our abuse contact i.e abuse@zohocorp.com via SC. 1) We never pass on the complete information that you provide to our customers we either block them or warn them with few non trackable information like date of complaint/subject etc. 2) We never opted out of reports from SC. We want them. 3) We take action on all complaints by our monitoring desk persons manually. Kindly provide further information to resolve this issue. Regards, Rajasekar.S.V
  19. Rajasekar.svel

    Spamcop no longer works with Outlook/Exchange

    This is from Zoho Abuse Monitoring Desk. We had taken action on the account who sent the email in 2 days of report from spamcop by warning and also unsubscribing you. Kindly let us know if you receive such complaints.
  20. gnarlymarley

    What do do with Amazon hosted spammers

    This is unfortunate. Don, you will also be remembered.
  21. Hey Petzl, There's quite a few using this method. I've noticed Hetzner do take action on receipt of submission/s. Cheers! G🦗H
  22. Hey Gnarlymarley, I'm all for understanding👍 No, I wasn't referring to https://www.spamcop.net/sc?action=showroute x I was suggesting a pinned topic/table exist in SC Forum, collating addresses that SC doesn't identify BUT SC members have shown to be effective spam fighting endpoints. Cheers! G🦗H
  23. won't accept abuse reports send you here https://abuse.hetzner.com/issues/new?lang=en
  24. gnarlymarley

    What do do with Amazon hosted spammers

    I am just trying to understand. So if I understand correctly, you are offering to update the current tables that Don D'Minion (I haven't seen him for a while) used to update such as can be seen at https://www.spamcop.net/sc?action=showroute;ip=150.107.103.51;typecodes=16?
  25. Seems this AmazonAWS spams are trying to get your computer infected take care https://www.2-spyware.com/remove-amazonaws.html
  26. Hello All, The idea for an address table/pinned topic, was not that it was open to anyone to post the info, rather it was/is a repository of all "effective/helpful" addresses SC parser is not identifying, managed by SCFA. (I offered to do the grunt work if SCF Admins or whomever currently carries the work/maintenance burden wanted some willing assistance). This translates to, the table/topic existing, any identified addresses forwarded to SCFA who'd then update the table/pinned topic. Cheers G🦗H
  27. gnarlymarley

    What do do with Amazon hosted spammers

    Lisati/MIG, Though I would like this access, I would prefer not to give spammers more access than they really need. While it would be nice to be able to correct addresses in our own table, it is not a good idea to open it up to people that are using the forums to put in their spam, or even to paste in bad abuse addresses. Forum spam posted in the R&RA is why I like the deputies to act as a double check what shows up there.
  1. Load more activity
×