n4af

Members
  • Content count

    7
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About n4af

  • Rank
    Newbie
  1. Looks like liquid web has been a blackhat for a LONG time. My question is I keep reporting the same sequence of email origination: Tracking message source: 67.227.164.146: Routing details for 67.227.164.146 [refresh/show] Cached whois for 67.227.164.146 : abuse[at]liquidweb.com Using abuse net on abuse[at]liquidweb.com abuse net liquidweb.com = admin[at]sourcedns.com, ipadmin[at]liquidweb.com, abuse[at]sourcedns.com, lisa[at]webclickhosting.com Using best contacts admin[at]sourcedns.com ipadmin[at]liquidweb.com abuse[at]sourcedns.com lisa[at]webclickhosting.com Yum, this spam is fresh! Message is 0 hours old 67.227.164.146 not listed in cbl.abuseat.org 67.227.164.146 not listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net 67.227.164.146 not listed in accredit.habeas.com 67.227.164.146 not listed in plus.bondedsender.org 67.227.164.146 not listed in iadb.isipp.com How is it conceivable/possible in this universe that they are not on a B.L. ??? Is it worth continuing to report them ??? I guess I do not understand how this works, gotta believe I am not the only one reporting this steady string of spam. BlackLotus and CC, I understand but how does the above ORIGINATOR of spam stay off the list ???? Is there any value to keep reporting them ??? Thanks, Howard
  2. It seems to me the CF is doing a better job. I have not seen any criminals hiding behind them for the last week of spam (at least not here). Now, what to do about hosting RIGHTSIDE.CO AND OVH.CA They host 95% of all spam sites rcvd here. Howie
  3. I may have jumped the gun in thinking they were opening up their Abuse address. Will update if I get further info. Howard
  4. Hi Don - Yes it was. But I am asking if SC could revisit that ? I complained via BBB and was assured they would do better. I sent a report in directly today that did NOT bounce. Tks, Howard
  5. Working thru BBB and Jennie [at] singlehop, it looks like they may have activated their abuse address., which seems to have gone unattended. I tested it with a SingleHop spam reported (directly) to abuse[at]singlehop.com and did NOT get a bounce. Possible to notify SC to try reactivation of this reporting adr ??? Netops seems to be ignored by SingleHop. I do not mean to imply they have gone whitehat, but would like to see SC try their ABUSE address again, which is presently abuse#singlehop.com[at]devnull.spamcop.net Sincerely, Howard
  6. Same problem with SingleHop here. They say to use 'abuse[at]singlehop.com' but it bounces. I have opened https://chicago.app.bbb.org/complaint/view/94413935/c/dgddlo to document the attacks on our mailserver. Always an excuse not to take their client's spam down. I have blocked their IP's but hope SpamHaus picks up on their blackhat antics. Howard Hoyt