Jump to content

justauser

Members
  • Content Count

    18
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About justauser

  • Rank
    Member

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Location
    New York
  1. justauser

    Beta Test New Webmail

    This would be still the case.This would be a show-stopper for me. You can find one at Webmail Keyboard Shortcut Reference Card, posted by JeffG over a year ago. No, my email address is not obvious.
  2. justauser

    Chain Letter?

    You might also be interested in the documentary at http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8260059923762628848
  3. justauser

    193.252.22.28 blocked

    193.252.22.28 not listed in bl.spamcop.net
  4. FTR, please note that: GoDaddy appears to be using a global spam filter. Said filter bounces mail it doesn't like (can you say "backscatter"?). Their use of said filter is not generally disclosed to their customers (I found out the hard way). Said filter is unavoidable (without whitelisting domains ending in a through z). Said filter includes content checking that checks URLs against the SBL or something that the SBL feeds. I object to items 2 through 4 above.
  5. justauser

    "release and whitelist" request

    Yes, that would be nice. I assume you're talking about the Email System?
  6. justauser

    Odd URL...

    It is probably because OE uses the faulty notion of areas mapped within an image overriding the image's href for clicking but not hovering purposes.
  7. justauser

    Spammed

    So a misconfigured Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2657.72 configured to use the German Language, three levels deep in a German network, and calling itself postmaster[at]ulm.de bounced the spam without revealing any of the Received Header Lines, so we can't track the source of that particular message without asking postmaster[at]ulm.de, who probably does not prefer English. However, we do have the payload URLs, all of which point to IP Address 218.65.209.27, listed twice by the SBL as SBL34434 (218.65.209.27/32) and SBL34688 218.65.209.0/24; see also the ROKSO records for Ukranians Alex Blood / Alexander Mosh / AlekseyB / Alex Polyakov (compsoagg.com ; syzygialjc.info ; sa.akekicb.com). SpamCop's parser recommends reporting abuse by that IP Address to hostmaster[at]gx163.net, anti-spam[at]chinanet.cn.net, ct-abuse[at]abuse.sprint.net, and postmaster[at]gx163.net. I'd suggest adding abuse[at]gx163.net (because it should work) and abuse[at]savvis.net (which provides connectivity from chinanet directly to the US (LA, Dallas, Atlanta, Washington, and New York) per my traceroute). Would you care to post another bounce message, this time with the Received Header Lines in the bounced message it contains? Thanks!
  8. Exactly what is the update? Thanks!
  9. justauser

    Mail forwarding services

    The following info just showed up in my mailbox:
  10. justauser

    Spamcop Delisting

    SpamCop's mailserver(s) that deliver mailhost configuration emails don't automatically resend like this, do they? If not, why not?
  11. justauser

    entire board layout is very counterintuitive

    Thanks for everything, Wazoo! You're the best!!!!
  12. justauser

    Handling Blowback Denials

    Already done, thanks. They just don't get it.
  13. justauser

    Handling Blowback Denials

    Thanks. I've already sent a Manual Report upstream.
  14. Hi all. Say that a spammer sends spam email using my email address as the return-path to [deaduser][at]supereva.it, MAILER-DAEMON[at]supereva.it bounces to me, I report the misdirected bounce using SpamCop, and abuse[at]supereva.it replies as follows: Say that this process is repeated half a dozen times over the course of two months. At what point does it become abusive enough that I can take further action? Are these ignorant and abusive replies by abuse[at]supereva.it themselves reportable? Thanks.
  15. justauser

    Graphic & Link added

    Sorry, I can't, it appears broken. Or maybe I just don't have access to it.
×