• Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About klappa

  • Rank

Recent Profile Visitors

1,106 profile views
  1. Yea! Still continuing getting this spam with the fake ipv6 address. Now they even faked it in the Received line. Should i snippet out that too and type it in the comment section?
  2. There was a big dump with 80million leaked e-mail addresses a few months ago.
  3. How do i provide the tracking URL? Spamcop won't even process the spam since it can't find the source IP.
  4. Recently i've got several phishing spam e-mails where Spamcop has problem finding the source IP. It has a IPV6 address. Parsing header: host 2002:a17:902:968e:0:0:0:0 (getting name) no name 0: Received: by 2002:a17:902:968e:: with SMTP id n14-v6mr17341432plp.21.1519125092798; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 03:11:32 -0800 (PST) No unique hostname found for source: 2002:a17:902:968e:0:0:0:0 Possible forgery. Supposed receiving system not associated with any of your mailhosts Will not trust this Received line. Mailhost configuration problem, identified internal IP as source Mailhost:Please correct this situation - register every email address where you receive spam No source IP address found, cannot proceed. Here's the full e-mail header. Delivered-To: x Received: by with SMTP id 35csp5053975qgd; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 03:11:32 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x224K8EtTlH91SvD5EnHpHEDVS/HuvBrl3NjoqwAlh53HQcCPMB5F6HAiTiutJMNxFVkMaAD8 X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:968e:: with SMTP id n14-v6mr17341432plp.21.1519125092798; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 03:11:32 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1519125092; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=zY8+LATQ6rtkMmZafX3BoHX+x9gLlAgJ0JBI60ZSnh3Wzn4DJp2zfSktOPpi65Yq7n SGFg6QDpIgMut9h6rR5roEu+GChwUzy1R6EC8UGQkhz4aqDUhKcMQbYyo/Pj5Ce8bJLk WktKF6lklIAxippTa5FhwFhQlzFGqvGpHL3lySBtiZVpv9EJ4oBxlqDz8h53bSPEDEzF YaRxniWGNETCO/z7524HW5ztD08HWYEczKbLSDW031FYSPZF3K8cPCvK+Ci0z4snimVi aRaqAUG9tNBTg1s7EoWUAEcfL1G+9hNEtT9YoZStToD6i7P59j59S5Bctbk287jiaRz+ Crzg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:message-id:reply-to :from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=XgHhSVkGXCeZrEbTJfxFlQ+NGi30OMh5lUpaPwhKx/0=; b=NGtXFOsFUxir8lCCaLXCY7k4Tbe6YMhbTGlU7TUD34t++VgyI/KL6Ge/+ZAd4H72yV HGR4TiVpn2y/lHSRtBLOeF9PbxKE+okLkDPw9Zt7l5P/40YJpHelBkgoeC+7DGDtYNCI UdHRUKXxk3midNHI2OZgkz18LYHJ6ZX90BMZMmfaADPfxlxULo1j/mtBzzqV6CzIuRP2 Bd6PIbO9wWp7aCqfyyHCcAvtH13o2Wgn4DK5Znmam0zP56ft5jg+r3Lz9uR4RmdpYF5a I3IyIEKXlHcc32yd2yByMQ1RlWwSr4tFzTfsOJqBNC0ODM46v1lBorXHqalmPtiBWivD s7aA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of www.@royal.ocn.ne.jp designates as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=WWW.@royal.ocn.ne.jp Return-Path: <WWW.@royal.ocn.ne.jp> Received: from mbkd0226.ocn.ad.jp (mbkd0226.ocn.ad.jp. []) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f6si7228610pgn.336.2018.; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 03:11:32 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of www.@royal.ocn.ne.jp designates as permitted sender) client-ip=; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of www.@royal.ocn.ne.jp designates as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=WWW.@royal.ocn.ne.jp Received: from mf-smf-ucb027c3 (mf-smf-ucb027c3.ocn.ad.jp []) by mbkd0226.ocn.ad.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 532CDD07339; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 20:11:15 +0900 (JST) Received: from ntt.pod01.mv-mta-ucb022 ([]) by mf-smf-ucb027c3 with ESMTP id o5p9emuQ1jyDio5pKee0FW; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 20:11:15 +0900 Received: from vcwebmail.ocn.ad.jp ([]) by ntt.pod01.mv-mta-ucb022 with id CzBE1x00F2ud8JZ01zBESa; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 11:11:14 +0000 Received: from mzcstore292.ocn.ad.jp (mz-fcb292p.ocn.ad.jp []) by vcwebmail.ocn.ad.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 20:11:14 +0900 (JST) Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 20:11:14 +0900 (JST) From: Dr James Wadas <WWW.@royal.ocn.ne.jp> Reply-To: Dr James Wadas <janepilot3@gmail.com> Message-ID: <384029775.6673075.1519125074670.JavaMail.root@royal.ocn.ne.jp> Subject: REPLY TO HER QUICK MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [] Urgent Attention This is my second time I am sending you this notification, simply contact jane hillary the pilot with your contact information and your nearest airport to land, so that she can deliver the Package worth ($9.5 Million USD) as she just landed in your country now but misplaced your information, she will give you more details when you re-confirm details. Your personal code to the box is XLA21492014SD. NB indicate this code to the diplomat jane hillary, so that she can know that you are the rightful owner of the box. Contact her with the information listed below Name.... jane hillary Email....(janepilot3@gmail.com) Phone....._(608)7138825 Reconfirm your current information as requested below Beneficiary Name.......... Country................. City..................... Current address........... Nearest airport........... Direct phone number....... I.d copy................ Best regard Dr James Wadas
  5. My housepet spammer which spams me with spam containing sexual date invitations from women (which is obviously fake) never stopss no matter how many spamcop reports i make. The IP's involved never shows on Spamcops blacklists despite being blocked by many other blacklists. In all these years Spamcop have been very bad blocking any IP's involved from any spammer i've reported . Why should i pay for a service which doesn't give me a satisfied service? Doing it manually is one thing but how many reports does it have to take until the IP's involved shows up on Spamcops BL? Regarding the spammer he usually use URL shortening services to hide the real domain, that way Spamcop will never catch the real domain and both domain host and registrar of that domain neglects any responsibility since that domain isn't listed in the spam itself and he can happily continue pestering me and many others with dozens of porn mails per day. Now can anyone incline me to continue using Spamcop?
  6. Cloudflare gets paid big sums of money from the spammers for their illegal activity and as long as they don't get any law enforcement on them they will let spammer continue do his things. You can write to
  7. Many spammers use these services to avoid their domain which they advertises in their spam to be avoided by e-mail reporting services like Spamcop. Is there a way around that other than to manually report the target domains? Recently this spammer i have got has used the bitly services to avoid being caught. Unfortunately bitly never seem to take any action against him no matter how many Spamcop reports i send so he can happily continue using them without being suspended. If i report the target domains to the webhosts running them they often don't take any responsibility. Cloudflare often don't do anything other than to blame they often act as a reverse proxy. It's very frustrating!
  8. Haha! That will hopefully let them out of their arse!
  9. Thank you for you compassion I contacted the law enforcement in that country where the spam originates from. Hopefully they will do something about it. Those damn web domain hosts that ignores my spamcop and even their own abuse form reports can go to hell!
  10. That's unfortunate. Had problems with both Cloudflare and Name.com ignoring my requests recently and now i have nowhere to complain.
  11. Post a spam report so i can look into it.
  12. I get the same spam with phony and fake dating sites which is hosted by Cloudflare. Talk to me in PM!
  13. Could you not report the network host to ICANN or someone else? Regarding 3) plenty of spam use URL shorteners services and redirection links. One have to manually report to the network provider for the destination domain since Spamcop can't recognize such spam. And those webhost companies providers often neglect any responsibility if their domain isn't explicit visible in the body of the e-mail. Not even if doing it through their abuse form will they care.
  14. That's must be illegal? Does everyone US registrar act that way or is it just NAME.COM? Of course and Cloudflare the webhost have gotten all my Spamcop reports for months now but it seems they either don't care or read them.