• Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About bengan

  • Rank
  1. $ whois -h -b inetnum: - abuse-mailbox:
  2. Shouldn't addresses like IPv4 Link-Local be handled in same way as RFC1918? Sort of: "move on to next received line".
  3. Hi, The first one has a "Recieved" with an IP-number that don't have a route in the routing table (BGP). It's also an early registration prefix. The prefix doesn't have a registration in APNIC that is responsible for the whois-db of The last "Received" is an RFC-1918-address. The only "real" IP-number in the Received headers is the outlook address If this is a real email it's Microsoft that is responsible for this weirdness.
  4. Abuse contact for ' -' is ''
  5. Hi, Since several years ago the ripe-whois has a flag, -b, that lists the abuse contact if there is one. Three out of 5 RIR whois servers support this. RIPE NCC, APNIC and AFRINIC while LACNIC and ARIN don't. man whois | grep \\-b -b Return brief IP address ranges with abuse contact. An example that lead me here was this. Spamcop don't find abuse contact for But whois -h -b gets you inetnum: - abuse-mailbox: