Marc M

  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About Marc M

  • Rank
  1. the ip of the url www nl is not the same as the ip used to send the mail but it still keep for "statistical tracking" maybe because it is the same abuse email... but not because it is the same ip as for the smtp If I receive identical spam every day, I do not report at the same time. for example today I report at 11 am. if tomorrow I report for the same ip at 10 am, there will be 2 reports in less than 24 hours but this spammer is never listed. another example of 2 spam from the same ip in a few hours but the ip is not listed in SPBL I do not know if SP is still actively developed, but perhaps it would be necessary to provide an adjustment so that an accumulation of reports on the same ip ends up having an impact. Because I seriously ask myself of the usefulness of my reports because in the current configuration, they are without effect (bounce or ignored by the service of abuse, no impact in terms of BL) Regards, Marc
  2. I reread the page, usefully because I did not remember a few details. The sentence : The SCBL will not list an IP address with only one report filed. mean only one report ever ? or one report for every daily spam should trigger an add in the BL ? not related but is it true that SURBL use SP user report regarding url in the body of spam ? thank you for the precision about the difference of same ip for url and smtp or different ip, I had not thought. I thought there was also a boost (for inclusion in the SPBL) for reports coming from registered user compared to reporting from spamassasin module in anonymous mode. This is not the case ? Regards, Marc
  3. those 3 priority work badly for spams I report since more than 1 year (only one ip adding to SP blacklist... maybe too little people report those country-related spam) I thought there was a 4) store urls reported as supporting spam and those report are used for example by surbl as indicated on their page why else SP store stats when abusing@hosteur bounce if it has no value ? like this one SP store stats for hoster when it bounce but drop it if the hoster is a spam-friendly and request no-spam-report ? that's strange...
  4. here it is : another : of course, but I thought that one of the benefits of SP was to feed another BL with confirmed links in spam. I am wrong ? I already send my reports to knujon but if it is useful to pass them to others, I can add them easily. the ideal being not having to do the same operation several times (it would be convenient to be able to add a forward "automatically checked")
  5. Hello, In case of : ISP does not wish to receive reports regarding http://url.ext/ - no date available Why the abuse email was dropped ? should it be or something like that to allow third party to known that this url is used by spammer (and more : the isp don't care about spam hosted website) ? Regards, Marc
  6. thanks for your reply. It is what I 'll make.
  7. Hello, I get a reply from a spammer. This spammer reply was send to my and SC forward it to my email. In the "Past reports" tab, the "Report History:" for this report id only show the date of my report The tracking url doesn't show the spammer reply, nor a way to send a note to one of the abuse email How answer the spammer using the as from email ? Regards, Marc