Jump to content

kfasold

Members
  • Content Count

    15
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About kfasold

  • Rank
    Member
  1. Just to provide closure, spamcop is now recognizing itself & mailhost configuration can be performed... after doing so, I reprocessed the previous item that resulted in reporting myself, and it found the correct spam souce... thanks Don!
  2. 1004, thanks for the confirmation... probably worth putting in news on the webmail login, as well as on the main spamcop page... else gonna end up with people like me reporting themselves!
  3. Thanks; yep, the original reports from 2004 are shortly following the mailhost implementation, & also from me... The 2nd appears to be exactly the same problem; don's explanation of the issues would appear to be the same thing happening now, after the maintenance... Don't have any tracking -- managed to report myself to my domain host yesterday about 1:30p, they suspended my account (thus killing 90% of my email access) -- but the email they sent notifying me ended up in a suspended acccount as well... finally got that straightened out about 5pm, just in time for the maintenance! Could finally try to configure mailhosts for their new ip's & discovered this... just one of those days... frustrating to hit delete on held mail rather than reporting, but until I can get my account reconfigured appropraitely... I'll forward a pointer to this thread to admin, just in case.
  4. I've run into an issue with mailhosts... I ended up reporting myself due to isp mx changes... so I attempted to update mailhosts info. Couldn't do so until after the maintenance window... Tried to update current provider, received an error when processing the robot message. Thought the error might have been caused by isp not putting info in headers, so I tried sending to a couple of other ones... and got the same error each time: Sorry, SpamCop has encountered errors: Source IP not found. Your email host does not appear to correctly identify the sending IP of the email you receive. The last address identified by your mail host was 204.15.80.52 (). This does not appear to be a spamcop.net address. If you feel this is in error, please try again or seek help in the SpamCop help forum: http://www.spamcop.net/help.shtml HOWEVER, 204.15.80.52 is shown in the headers as Received: from prod-sc-www1.spamcop.net (204-15-80-52.ironport.com[204.15.80.52]) by isp.att.net (frfwmxc08) with SMTP id <20090327033058M0800brh1le>; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 03:30:58 +0000 which does appear to be a spamcop.net address??? Has something become disconnected in the process????
  5. SpamCop v 2 Copyright © 1998-2006, IronPort Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Failed to load spam header: 2461275126 / 5c79d1d341247267b2d605d0f2d8b9c9 putRow The MySQL server is running with the --read-only option so it cannot execute this statement (1290)/sc?id=z2461275126z5c79d1d341247267b2d605d0f2d8b9c9z
  6. Tried to release or release & whitelist several emails from my held mail this evening. The "x messages released", etc. shows up, but the messages remain in held mail & aren't moved to the inbox. In addition, the address isn't added to the whitelist. Also posted via the "problems" link in webmail. kf
  7. kfasold

    New Look Buttons don't work

    Title pretty much says it -- 'new look' buttons don't work in Netscape 4.8, either on Mac or PC. Please don't reply 'upgrade' -- we're happy w/4.8.
  8. Just to provide closure, I submitted my problem via Ellen; nothing we tried produced a usable result, so she forwarded it to Julian. A couple of days of bouncing emails back & forth followed, and last Thursday (4/15) Julian found & fixed the problem... then he fixed it again on Friday 4/16. My submission worked fine, if you've been affected by the problem please try again & report it here as well as via the deputies email. kf
  9. Same problem I've been trying to report. It appears the 'from recipient address" confirmation code is generated when the configiration email is returned (forwarded as attachment, as inclusion in another message, etc.), and for some reason it doesn't match. As a further test, I tried editing my config email so the confirmation code was in lower case (to presumably match whatever was incorrectly calculating it inside spamcop), to no avail -- same error message, but in my case the confirmation codes appear to match: Hello SpamCop user, Sorry, but SpamCop has encountered errors: Sorry, confirmation codes do not match: >From recipient address: rbmfg1thozd429gu >From header: rbmfg1thozd429gu >From body: Hopefully a deputy or Julian will chime in...
  10. To clarify: I've tried submitting the destination email address on the mailhosts screen in both all UC & all LC; in each case I've received the configuration email & returned it to the appropriate address via "forward as attachment" (the same process which worked fine a week ago), and received an error return message (as posted). The case of the email address was altered when originally submitted, not (at least by me) later in the process. It would appear someone else is messing around with it, but from the RFC's NAME[at]DOMAIN.EXT == name[at]domain.ext ???
  11. Running into a problem w/a new mailhost on my account -- submit the address, receive the email, & forward as attachment -- same thing I did on my account multiple times last week with no problem -- now I get the following error returned: Hello SpamCop user, Sorry, but SpamCop has encountered errors: Sorry, confirmation codes do not match: From recipient address: rbmfg1thozd429gu From header: rBmfg1tHozD429Gu From body: Note the email is forwarded unmodified; the codes in the headers of the received message match those in the body, and the email address matches. I've tried entering the destination email address in both all upper- and lower-case, to no avail. Original message available if Julian wants it.
  12. kfasold

    Bellsouth

    Configured my mailhosts on Thursday, no problems until today. I'm getting messages such as the following in parsing / email parsing replies: Received: from [205.152.59.32] ([66.160.54.59]) by imf07aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.08 201-253-122-130-108-20031117) with SMTP id <20040320162047.RVYE1798.imf07aec.mail.bellsouth.net[at][205.152.59.32]>; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 11:20:47 -0500 Possible forgery. Supposed receiving system not associated with any of your mailhosts warning:Please ensure that bellsouth.net is not your own service provider. Will not trust anything beyond this header warning:Forgery detected, or mailhost configuration incomplete. Please verify source IP identified. error:You have failed to configure your own mail host, from which you pop mail Mailhost: mail01.mail.bellsouth.net ( 205.152.59.17 ) error:No IP found Bellsouth.net is my service provider, and I've submitted 'mailhost configuration messages' back that came through the same server (imf07aec.mail.bellsouth.net) & received a 'successful configuration' message, yet the server doesn't show on my 'mailhosts' screen. Same probelm w/the following servers as well: imf00aec.mail.bellsouth.net imf01aec.mail.bellsouth.net imf03aec.mail.bellsouth.net imf06aec.mail.bellsouth.net imf08aec.mail.bellsouth.net imf09aec.mail.bellsouth.net imf10aec.mail.bellsouth.net imf14aec.mail.bellsouth.net Seems the pattern is obvious -- Julian, can you manually add imf00aec.mail.bellsouth.net through imf14aec.mail.bellsouth.net to my mailhosts list? user is (same name as my forum login) [at] spamcop.net
  13. kfasold

    Bellsouth

    Here's another one for you -- tried to configure an account w/mailhost provided by spring hill college & received the following error message: No MX records found for alumni.shc.edu. although I can send an email message to myaddress[at]alumni.shc.edu just fine. ?????
  14. Got a small problem -- tried to "Add new hosts" w/my spamcop.net account, so the forwarding from it would appear in the list. Received the email fine & forwarded it back, but then I received an error response. It appears the machine at 206.14.107.103, calling itself victor2.ironport.com (HELO spamcop.net), isn't known to spamcop??? Hello SpamCop user, Sorry, but SpamCop has encountered errors: Sorry, source IP not found. Your email host does not appear to correctly identify the sending IP of the email you recieve. The last address identified by your mail host was 206.14.107.103 (). This does not appear to be a spamcop.net address. If you feel this is in error, please try again or seek help in the SpamCop help forum: <http://www.spamcop.net/help.shtml> below are the headers: Received: from c60.cesmail.net [216.154.195.49-5] by WSCSYS02.WirelessCorp.Com ID 2604_702046; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:46:12 -0800 X-AIGRoute: 915 Received: from unknown (HELO blade1.cesmail.net) (192.168.1.211) by c60.cesmail.net with SMTP; 18 Mar 2004 12:46:10 -0500 Received: (qmail 10025 invoked by uid 1010); 18 Mar 2004 17:46:08 -0000 Delivered-To: spamcop-net-xxx Received: (qmail 9443 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2004 17:45:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO blade3.cesmail.net) (192.168.1.213) by blade1.cesmail.net with SMTP; 18 Mar 2004 17:45:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 29983 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2004 17:45:47 -0000 Received: from victor2.ironport.com (HELO spamcop.net) (206.14.107.103) by blade3.cesmail.net with SMTP; 18 Mar 2004 17:45:47 -0000 X-SpamCop-Conf: <removed> X-SpamCop-Test1: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Received: from [204.1.119.230] by spamcop.net with HTTP; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 17:45:26 GMT
  15. Confirming the problem & the apparent method of introduction -- although I think it's been a while since the entry was added. In my case there's only one, and it's at the top of the list as well. kfasold
×