Jeff G.
-
Content Count
3,727 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by Jeff G.
-
-
I'd go with "Send As Is" as well.
-
-
It's now time to add to this request similar OCR scanning for SpamCop Email System Customers before SpamAssassin, so that SpamAssassin (and perhaps later content filtering apps) can read and recognize all the P&D buzzwords, and score accordingly.
Keywords: Optical Character Recognition Pump&Dump Pump and Dump
-
That's a fine workaround, but the part of the page that is supposed to actually DISPLAY the link to http://www.spamcop.net/mcgi?action=showhistory&offset=10 or http://members.spamcop.net/mcgi?action=sho...y&offset=10 or http://mailsc.spamcop.net/mcgi?action=show...y&offset=10 is still missing, and therefore broken.
And no, there is no link to http://www.spamcop.net/mcgi?action=showhistory&offset=20 on http://www.spamcop.net/mcgi?action=showhistory&offset=10 either (for example).
-
You might then be interested in http://forum.spamcop.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=1367 or perhaps one of the other projects on http://thescambaiter.com/antispam/thousands of pings would all be coming from all differentsenders
-
Some servers can, they issue a 500-series error message for the dot (that terminates DATA).I'm not sure you can reject a message after receiving the body -
Do you mean 195.7.97.106 or a different one?Goog morning, yesterday my public IP adress
No, it wasn't. It may have been listed by the SCBL, but the SCBL is a "Blocking List", not a "black list".has been black listed by spamcop.
You may or may not (probably not, in the case of email to spamtraps). After you have read the "Why am I Blocked" FAQ. Current evidence suggests that the reason why is for sending mail to spamtraps, probably UUBE. What reason(s) was/were listed yesterday on http://www.spamcop.net/w3m?action=blcheck&...ip=195.7.97.106?My first question is : may I obtain an example of email which explain the reason why ?
Because 24 hours passed after the last infraction. That's how the SCBL works. You'd have found that out if you'd read the SCBL FAQ.My second question : I have been delisted automatically : why ?
You're welcome.many thanks -
I parsed your example with a non-Mailhosted account, resulting in Tracking URL http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z1097698991z9...be2dfc7dd0c4fcz, which gave me the following:Here's an example:
What Tracking URL did you try to use?Sorry, this email is too old to file a spam report. You must report spam within 2 days of receipt. This mail was received on 6 Oct 2006 09:29:17 -0000Message is 3.6 days old
...
If reported today, reports would be sent to:
Re: 84.228.47.158 (Administrator of IP block - statistics only)
abuse[at]smile.net.il
-
The feature you mentioned, although titled "Report History", is more properly called the "View recent reports" feature, which can be accessed via the "View recent reports" Link on the "Past Reports" Tab, or directly via http://www.spamcop.net/mcgi?action=showhistory, http://members.spamcop.net/mcgi?action=showhistory, or http://mailsc.spamcop.net/mcgi?action=showhistory (depending on which site you're using). My account is experiencing the same symptom, in that only the first page shows up, and there is no link available for viewing subsequent pages (of older Reports). More specifically, there is absolutely nothing but a newline between the last 'No reports filed</div>' and '<div id="footer">'. I have just emailed a SpamCop Admin via service[at]admin.spamcop.net to look into this issue for us.
-
No, but that's been preventing notifications to you and/or your admins of problems.Are you saying that it's bounces to this address that caused this host to get listed in the SCBL?
OK, here's one: stop sending UUBE.Just thought people might add an acronym or two to my short list for me to go and check out further. -
In my case (using OE6), it is recording the machine name, which I understand OE6 typically uses in its HELO greeting. And I couldn't get OE6's SSL to work with it. Other than that, it works just great!Note: the Received: from in header #5 is your SpamCop email user name -
BTW, please be aware of the info on http://www.enom.com/domains/whois.asp?Doma...amp;submit.y=13 and http://www.whitepages.com/10866/search/Rev...hone=7704320779 .
-
As soon as you change something and click the "Modify" Button bringing you to https://webmail.spamcop.net/horde/imp/spamc....php?modified=1 or http://webmail.spamcop.net/horde/imp/spamc....php?modified=1,how do I make spamcop.net go get it now? How do I make spamcop go ahead and pull the e-mails off the server?the SpamCop Email System should start POPping your email, or throwing an Error. It should take no more than 15 minutes. You did configure your Gmail account to allow you to POP from it, right?
-
That's great, but please make sure that you still implement all of the aliases required of you by RFC2142.I will turn off the catchall immediately after I post this -
Unfortunately, it looks like you might not be getting any email whatsoever because server mail.macupgrades.co.uk.macupgrades.co.uk doesn't exist - see the following for details:
10/08/06 14:13:40 dig macupgrades.co.uk ...Dig macupgrades.co.uk[at]ns.iomart.co.uk (84.22.161.11) ...
Authoritative Answer
Recursive queries supported by this server
Query for macupgrades.co.uk type=255 class=1
macupgrades.co.uk SOA (Zone of Authority)
Primary NS: ns.iomart.co.uk
Responsible person: dns[at]iomart.com
serial:2005060904
refresh:10800s (3 hours)
retry:3600s (60 minutes)
expire:604800s (7 days)
minimum-ttl:86400s (24 hours)
macupgrades.co.uk NS (Nameserver) ns2.iomart.co.uk
macupgrades.co.uk NS (Nameserver) ns.iomart.co.uk
macupgrades.co.uk MX (Mail Exchanger) Priority: 10 mail.macupgrades.co.uk.macupgrades.co.uk
macupgrades.co.uk MX (Mail Exchanger) Priority: 15 mail.macupgrades.co.uk.macupgrades.co.uk
macupgrades.co.uk A (Address) 212.227.77.248
ns.iomart.co.uk A (Address) 84.22.161.11
ns2.iomart.co.uk A (Address) 62.128.193.201
Dig macupgrades.co.uk[at]ns2.iomart.co.uk (62.128.193.201) ...
Authoritative Answer
Recursive queries supported by this server
Query for macupgrades.co.uk type=255 class=1
macupgrades.co.uk SOA (Zone of Authority)
Primary NS: ns.iomart.co.uk
Responsible person: dns[at]iomart.com
serial:2005060904
refresh:10800s (3 hours)
retry:3600s (60 minutes)
expire:604800s (7 days)
minimum-ttl:86400s (24 hours)
macupgrades.co.uk NS (Nameserver) ns2.iomart.co.uk
macupgrades.co.uk NS (Nameserver) ns.iomart.co.uk
macupgrades.co.uk MX (Mail Exchanger) Priority: 10 mail.macupgrades.co.uk.macupgrades.co.uk
macupgrades.co.uk MX (Mail Exchanger) Priority: 15 mail.macupgrades.co.uk.macupgrades.co.uk
macupgrades.co.uk A (Address) 212.227.77.248
ns.iomart.co.uk A (Address) 84.22.161.11
ns2.iomart.co.uk A (Address) 62.128.193.201
...
-
mail.internode.on.net (203.16.214.182) has the following recent Report History (it shouldn't be sending bounces entitled "Returned mail: see transcript for details"):
Submitted: Sunday 2006/10/08 11:34:59 -0400: Returned mail: see transcript for details 1957171426 ( 203.16.214.182 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net --------------------------------------------- Submitted: Friday 2006/10/06 18:31:31 -0400: Returned mail: see transcript for details 1954684771 ( 203.16.214.182 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net --------------------------------------------- Submitted: Friday 2006/10/06 05:11:51 -0400: =?windows-1251?B?w+7r7uLt7uzzIOHz9ePg6/Ll8PM=?= 1953683393 ( 203.16.214.182 ) To: aunic[at]internode.com.au 1953683387 ( 150.101.155.102 ) To: spamcop[at]imaphost.com 1953683377 ( 150.101.155.102 ) To: abuse[at]internode.on.net --------------------------------------------- Submitted: Friday 2006/10/06 01:27:56 -0400: Returned mail: see transcript for details 1953425241 ( 203.16.214.182 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net ------------------------------------------------- Submitted: Thursday 2006/10/05 18:36:32 -0400: Returned mail: see transcript for details 1953020993 ( 203.16.214.182 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net ----------------------------------------------- Submitted: Monday 2006/10/02 02:05:54 -0400: Returned mail: see transcript for details 1947192429 ( 203.16.214.182 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net ------------------------------------------------ Submitted: Tuesday 2006/09/26 23:20:32 -0400: Returned mail: see transcript for details 1939973887 ( 203.16.214.182 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net ------------------------------------------------ Submitted: Tuesday 2006/09/26 09:55:05 -0400: =?iso-8859-1?B?oVKturOhpUjDuKW7pOKqa7rrpN/DuLtzqrq1tK3brk2u0SAsumHA8rdz?= =?i... 1939122998 ( 203.16.214.182 ) To: aunic[at]internode.com.au 1939122951 ( 203.122.240.116 ) To: spamcop[at]imaphost.com 1939122892 ( 203.122.240.116 ) To: abuse[at]internode.on.net --------------------------------------------- Submitted: Friday 2006/09/22 02:22:36 -0400: Returned mail: see transcript for details 1932973466 ( 203.16.214.182 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net ---------------------------------------------------- Submitted: Wednesday 2006/09/20 15:49:39 -0400: Returned mail: see transcript for details 1930617626 ( 203.16.214.182 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net
-
More Report History follows (each of the 13964 domains controlled by MCI/UUNet/Worldcom per http://www.senderbase.org/?searchBy=ipaddr...ng=142.77.1.111 needs to be checked for bouncing ("Undeliverable mail:") and for delayed mail warnings ("WARNING. Mail Delayed:")):
Submitted: Saturday 2006/10/07 23:29:46 -0400: WARNING. Mail Delayed: High-quality medications here. 1956418024 ( 142.77.1.111 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net ------------------------------------------------- Submitted: Saturday 2006/10/07 04:28:31 -0400: WARNING. Mail Delayed: vvatch this st-0ck Trade 1955242165 ( 142.77.1.111 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net --------------------------------------------- Submitted: Friday 2006/10/06 07:28:23 -0400: WARNING. Mail Delayed: Re: Home Loan - APPROVED. - 12Thu, 05 Oct 2006 21:56:0... 1953831594 ( 142.77.1.111 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net ------------------------------------------------- Submitted: Thursday 2006/10/05 09:28:30 -0400: Undeliverable mail: this is how I got thin 1952353510 ( 142.77.1.111 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net ----------------------------------------------- Submitted: Monday 2006/10/02 09:28:25 -0400: WARNING. Mail Delayed: Solid Loans with options. 1947636416 ( 142.77.1.111 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net ----------------------------------------------- Submitted: Sunday 2006/10/01 16:28:59 -0400: WARNING. Mail Delayed: this is how I got thin 1946704317 ( 142.77.1.111 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net
-
Please keep in mind that the limits of 50,000 bytes per Submitted spam and 100,000 bytes per Submission Email are still in effect.
-
Sorry, that doesn't work any more for regular Reports, and I'm not sure if it ever did for Quick Reports. Please see my most recent Post on the subject of "Personal copies of outgoing reports".I don't know if it is normal that reports are not sent to the "Personal Copies" address for spam which is Quick Reported. A quick search of the FAQ doesn't answer that question.Does anyone here know?
-
Certainly, old SpamCop Email System Customers have been permitted to use Quick Reporting without Mailhosts, until circumstances forced them to implement Mailhosts.In theory, new SpamCop email users are not permitted to use quick reporting until MailHosts are configured, but I have not been able to prove that statement. -
That last bit should be: contact the deputies via deputies[at]spamcop.net and include "Mailhosts" in the Subject.Another solution and if you get both a success and a failure email.:If you are technically fluent, read the Mailhost FAQ started by Wazoo that is found in the FAQ here.
If you are not technically fluent, contact the deputies at admin[at]spamcop.net.
-
More recent Report History follows (you should be accepting and acting on UUBE Reports, rather than opting not to receive them):
Submitted: Saturday 2006/10/07 18:58:23 -0400: Mail delivery failed : returning message to sender 1956179132 ( 216.254.136.21 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net ------------------------------------------------ Submitted: Saturday 2006/10/07 18:57:18 -0400: Mail delivery failed : returning message to sender 1956177981 ( 216.254.136.21 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net ------------------------------------------------ Submitted: Saturday 2006/10/07 04:56:21 -0400: Mail delivery failed : returning message to sender 1955272751 ( 216.254.136.21 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net ------------------------------------------------ Submitted: Saturday 2006/10/07 02:02:14 -0400: Mail delivery failed : returning message to sender 1955090106 ( 216.254.136.21 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net --------------------------------------------- Submitted: Friday 2006/10/06 22:17:21 -0400: Mail delivery failed : returning message to sender 1954881195 ( 216.254.136.21 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net --------------------------------------------- Submitted: Friday 2006/10/06 21:29:03 -0400: Mail delivery failed : returning message to sender 1954837468 ( 216.254.136.21 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net --------------------------------------------- Submitted: Friday 2006/10/06 18:47:49 -0400: Mail delivery failed : returning message to sender 1954696702 ( 216.254.136.21 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net --------------------------------------------- Submitted: Friday 2006/10/06 15:03:08 -0400: REQUEST TO BE OUR COMPANY'S PAYMENT AGENT IN YOUR REGION 1954459122 ( 216.254.136.21 ) To: aupviolations[at]primus.ca --------------------------------------------- Submitted: Friday 2006/10/06 12:13:41 -0400: Mail delivery failed : returning message to sender 1954233714 ( 216.254.136.21 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net ------------------------------------------------ Submitted: Thursday 2006/10/05 21:52:53 -0400: spam: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?ATTN: YOU WON =A31.5M (CLAIM IT NOW).?= 1954456583 ( 216.254.136.21 ) To: spamcop[at]imaphost.com 1954456574 ( 216.254.136.21 ) To: aupviolations[at]primus.ca --------------------------------------------- Submitted: Friday 2006/10/06 09:02:03 -0400: Mail delivery failed : returning message to sender 1953960092 ( 216.254.136.21 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net --------------------------------------------- Submitted: Friday 2006/10/06 08:37:16 -0400: MYSTERY SHOPPER WANTED EARN NO LESS THAN $ 500.00 1953925654 ( 216.254.136.21 ) To: aupviolations[at]primus.ca --------------------------------------------- Submitted: Friday 2006/10/06 07:49:41 -0400: Mail delivery failed : returning message to sender 1953862577 ( 216.254.136.21 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net --------------------------------------------- Submitted: Friday 2006/10/06 00:55:52 -0400: Mail delivery failed : returning message to sender 1953393459 ( 216.254.136.21 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net ------------------------------------------------- Submitted: Thursday 2006/10/05 17:46:15 -0400: Mail delivery failed : returning message to sender 1952968721 ( 216.254.136.21 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net ------------------------------------------------- Submitted: Thursday 2006/10/05 16:26:44 -0400: Mail delivery failed : returning message to sender 1952881542 ( 216.254.136.21 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net --------------------------------------------------- Submitted: Wednesday 2006/10/04 23:29:04 -0400: Mail delivery failed : returning message to sender 1951737240 ( 216.254.136.21 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net --------------------------------------------------- Submitted: Wednesday 2006/10/04 16:24:05 -0400: Mail delivery failed : returning message to sender 1951332937 ( 216.254.136.21 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net --------------------------------------------------- Submitted: Wednesday 2006/10/04 07:34:17 -0400: Mail delivery failed : returning message to sender 1950600067 ( 216.254.136.21 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net --------------------------------------------------- Submitted: Wednesday 2006/10/04 03:05:59 -0400: Mail delivery failed : returning message to sender 1950309905 ( 216.254.136.21 ) To: aupviolations[at]primus.ca --------------------------------------------------- Submitted: Wednesday 2006/10/04 00:39:22 -0400: Mail delivery failed : returning message to sender 1950149440 ( 216.254.136.21 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net ------------------------------------------------ Submitted: Tuesday 2006/10/03 20:54:58 -0400: Mail delivery failed : returning message to sender 1949945431 ( 216.254.136.21 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net ------------------------------------------------ Submitted: Tuesday 2006/10/03 07:14:31 -0400: NOTIFICA DEL PREMIO:CONGRATULAZIONI!!! 1948963158 ( 216.254.136.21 ) To: spamcop[at]imaphost.com 1948963153 ( 216.254.136.21 ) To: aupviolations[at]primus.ca ------------------------------------------------ Submitted: Tuesday 2006/10/03 07:04:11 -0400: Mail delivery failed : returning message to sender 1948949337 ( 216.254.136.21 ) ( UUBE ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net
-
Yes, a spammer can easily use bcc. Most do, and you'll maybe get a "bcc: undisclosed-recipients" if you're lucky. OTOH, some spam programs will just send "to:" a whole lot of recipients (and some badly-configured programs will send "bcc:" a whole lot of recipients, defeating the "blind" in "blind carbon copy"), in which case by default most email client programs will only show a limited number of those recipients by virtue of their design (need to save room on the screen for the other display elements).can a spammer use easely bcc ? -
Yes, you should definitely start using Mailhosts, if you haven't already, or you may end up Reporting Gmail rather than the actual perpetrator. Here follows a snippet from an email from SpamCop Admin on the subject:
I am sorry to report that the spam you get via ... GMail, etc, cannot always be processed correctly by our system, resulting in SpamCop accusing your own service provider as being the source of the spam you are reporting.You can compensate for that by running our Mailhost configuration utility so that SpamCop can create a list of the services that handle your email so that our system will know what servers to trust when you report your spam. You'll need to configure a host for *all* the providers you receive mail through.
You can accomplish that by logging into your SpamCop account at http://www.spamcop.net and using the Mailhosts link to tell SpamCop about *all* of your service providers, forwarding services, and webmail hosts. You need to register one email address for each network/host that handles your email.
Once you start configuring hosts, you can't report spam again until you get them all on your list because the Mailhost system completely changes the way SpamCop looks at your spam.
SpamCop "Cannot resolve" a valid URL
in SpamCop Reporting Help
Posted
Interestingly enough, http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/dnstime.ch?n....com&type=A currently says "Searching for systms.com A record at J.GTLD-SERVERS.NET. Reports no A records (NXDOMAIN). 208ms." and "Sorry, I could not continue.", my local tools cannot find domain systms.com in DNS, and http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z1098619467z7...7cd9b7b6bddfc7z is now showing "Host systms.com (checking ip) IP not found ; systms.com discarded as fake." and "Cannot resolve http://systms.com/online/www.rightreasons....ndex.html". Ask your ISP why you can resolve systms.com, possibly including results of a dig or nslookup command sent to your ISP's nameservers.
OTOH, consider that eNom still has systms.com registered, and eNom's nameservers like dns1.name-services.com are still returning results as follows when queried with dig: