Jump to content

dhanna

Membera
  • Content Count

    102
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by dhanna

  1. dhanna

    More humorous Spam

    I just love these... I can't stop laughing thinking about how stupid some people are... Dear citibank_ Members_,<br><br> _This mesage was ssent by-the Citi-Bank servers to veerify your_ E-mail addres.<br> You must complete this process by clicking on_the link beloww and enttering<br> in the litlle _window your Citibank _Atm full_card nummber and PiN that<br> _you use on the local Atm_Machine. That_is done for-your protection -g- because some_of our<br> members _no_longer_ have access to their _EMAIL_ adresses and we must verify it.<br><br>
  2. Had to laugh, what an idiot... My reponse, which I feel makes it funny too... I used the report id at spamcop as my return address. loyal reader ???? I have probably reported them before!
  3. I am a cox user and all my spam come to my cox accounts. I tried the cut and paste and it too shows no date... I usually submit, as attachment, to spamcop through my gmail account because if I send it through cox, it never arrives at spamcop because cox blocks it. Cox has made many changes over the months and it is just annoying. I need the speed I get so I can work from home but I am tired of their mail mess. I used to have a spamcop account which filtered my email until cox changed their spam processing and do not allow users to op-out of their spam filtering. So they block it and then I have to move it to get spamcop to pick it up. Too much time and work for spam.
  4. That would be ok if I didnt receive 50 to 100 a day... however, I do receive that many so I just started deleting them. If submit a few everyday to see if the issue has been resloved but as of yet, it has not. I have been working 70 to 80 hours a week the last 3 weeks or so, so deleting them just saves me time, time I really dont have time to waste. Nearly every single one I submit now is coming up with this error.
  5. http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z1032231897z3...2fb0ff15ff211fz http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z1032231951z7...2f9ab72ed96c0dz http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z1032232034z3...6984ef38a19b7az I guess the question now is, what has changed to cause this problem. I just do not have time to resubmit these, or mess around and figure out what is going on. The unfortunate thing is, if it does not report, I must move on and go to one that does. Since I submit via forwarding the email, and I forward 30 to 40 at a time, they get dumpped in a folder for 20 days or so then deleted. I just do not have time to go back and find out which ones I submitted that did not report correctly. We are in our busy season at work and I am working 60 to 70 hour weeks, have been for a month. I sent 6 in this morning and those three above had the issue. Did the spammer come up with a cleaver way of avoiding being reported?
  6. http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z1031856297z6...f9b12db7dfe5f0z Out of 50 I forwarded, about 10 came back with the no date error. I use outlook 2003 and just forward the email through a gmail account (SMTP). All my email accounts have the mailhosts configured. I have been submitting this way for months with no errors until yesterday. When I paste into the submittion form, I use Outlook with the spamsource add in. http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z1031873098za...70f9382aeb7eabz Another one, and it was about 10 min old when I sent it in
  7. Me too... here is the source Return-Path: <peterytdl[at]ilott.com> Received: from centrmimpi01.cox.net ([68.111.106.84]) by centrmmtai09.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060815093743.CKGD13416.centrmmtai09.cox.net[at]centrmimpi01.cox.net> for <dhanna[at]cox.net>; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 05:37:43 -0400 Received: from BSN-61-56-172.dial-up.dsl.siol.net ([86.61.56.172]) by centrmimpi01.cox.net with IMP id A9YQ1V02g3iwhuW0000000 Tue, 15 Aug 2006 05:32:33 -0400 Received: from mail.jsl.com by BSN-61-56-172.dial-up.dsl.siol.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id 5T5nmz0bw8T8 for <dhanna[at]cox.net>; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 03:32:59 -0400 Received: from unknown (dsnat [168.166.166.9]) by mail.jsl.com with SMTP for <dhanna[at]cox.net>; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 03:32:59 -0400 Reply-To: "Rosario Carroll" <peterytdl[at]ilott.com> From: "Rosario" <peterytdl[at]ilott.com> Message-ID: <2523481650.20060815033259[at]opcqethmo> Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 03:32:59 -0400 To: <dhanna[at]cox.net> Subject: Get replicas from Vacheron Constantin watch here MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Jaeger-LeCoultre replica watch – irreplaceable part of your image Wanna amaze everybody with your taste? Buy the Chronoswiss watch Noticeable discounts on replica watches from best brands http://57txbvswawtv0nnlannlann5.wardwiteji.st/ Top-rank replica watches from Tag Heuer at best price I submitted using forwarding the entire email first but when the error came up I went back through the forwarded email and used the submit form, receiving the same error. I can see the date just fine, why is it doing this? Two emails this morning that were not processed because of this.
  8. dhanna

    Number of Unreported Spam Left

    I usually forward 3 or so at a time and due to delays in having it reach my Queu, I can forward 20 or 30 before I know it/ When the parsing is slow and it is taking a minute or so per spam, I would like to know how many I have left to report. Can we get a count display next to our 'Report Now" Link? I used to pay for the filter, and use held mail but due to changes in my ISP, it is no longer an option. They filter now and I have to move them from a spam folder to my inbox. I have complained enough but until they change their process or allow us to turn it of (Yes, they forced it on their users), I am going to just submit them now. Any chance of getting a Queue Count? Moderator Edit: Merged this 'new' posting into an existing Topic/Discussion. PM sent to advise of this action.
  9. dhanna

    Too Many Links??

    In a spam submission this morning I received this... Saving links for later processing Too many links Do these every get processed? Do I get to see the results? I have never actually seen this message before.
  10. dhanna

    Reporting Errors

    Yes, I do have a spamcop email account but I do not use IMAP, in fact, I only use my spamcop account to get my mail from my public address, filter, send to my private address. Up until a few weeks ago I had the filtering blacklists and spamassasin level perfect, only getting one or two spam in my inbox and no legitimate mail being blocked. It was enjoyable. Most of the people I communicate with are on my whitelist and so scanning my held mail only takes a minute then I quick report them. I was using IMAP at one time, but I recently formated my HD and started with a fresh slate. I just never took the time to set it back up and never really had the need to continue with it. It would be a solution to my ISP learning an item is spam after they deliver it to me, then when I forward it, block it as spam. Their system takes a while to learn the spam they allowed through to my inbox is indeed spam.
  11. dhanna

    Reporting Errors

    Lately I have been getting more and more spam in my inbox. I have to report these manually because my ISP will filter it out as spam if I forward the email to my reporting address. Anyway, today I received errors like this.... which are causing me many pains... Some are 5 times longer with half a dozen of the putRow errors. Something wrong with the reporting service?
  12. dhanna

    BLAMING THE SPAMMEE

    Yea, reports always go to postmaster[at]intermix.com including all reports for the links as well.
  13. dhanna

    BLAMING THE SPAMMEE

    I agree that the tone seemed a little rude, but of course I do not know the whole story. In addition, I also believe that the site should have a challenge “3 way handshake” type system in place before sending someone “spam”. I have no tolerance for a site that fails to take these steps in this day and age (of spam). On another note, and maybe along the same lines, I have never visited yourbigvote.com and I receive many spam from them all the time. I never signed up to receive anything from them and never visited their site until I tried to remove myself from their list weeks ago. I still get spam from them and their IPs never seemed to be listed, so I have been wondering if I am the only one reporting them. Although, I have never heard from an Admin asking me for more info. Have any of you ever heard of this site, or received spam from them?
  14. dhanna

    Too Many Links??

    Ok, I beleive this is it, but I can verify it. It took a long time to parse and when I did it at home this morning, it was successful but from work, it times out on our cisco cache engine and fails to load. I think it is http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z709905423zf9...15d216905f2631z It was one of the only ones I cancled this morning before I left for work.
  15. I receive many more spam than I used to. I also take extra precautions when using my email address. For my web sites, I use a mysql database to store my email address and if someone wants to send me an email from my site, they must use the online form and select my name from the list of users. Can this lead to abuse of my email address? No, not the way I have it setup. It actually goes to an email address which then forwards to my regular address and I am able to tell if it is coming from the web site or not. Recently I noticed a persons name in the subject or body of the spam I have been receiving. I then received an email from legitimate site about an account created under that name. I can only assume that some idiot does not know his real email address and has put mine in, thinking it was his. I went to the legitimate site and tried to login, but it failed. I then submitted a request to reset my password and I received an email shortly afterward with the new password. I then logged in and was able to get account info and learn that this idiot lives in the same city that I do. He only used cross streets as his address, but he did put other legitimate info in his account. It is obvious he screwed up and put my email address instead of his own. This occurred less than two weeks ago. I am now getting 30 to 40 spam emails per day with his real name in the subject or body. This leads me to believe that the reporting has increased the number of spam I have received. Although I could be incorrect in this assumption, I still report all this email as spam. Is it spam if someone else accidentally or purposely submits your email address to a site, instead of their own? I say yes because as far as I am concerned I say all email submissions for a legitimate site should do the “3 way handshake”. For those who may not know, that is what I call, submitting your email and then getting an email from that site asking you to verify you are the owner of the account, before they start sending you email. Although a received legitimate email, not spam, with this users name, all the email received in the last week have been spam. I didn't start reporting it until last week. So as for this post, I do believe that the spammers do put identifying code in their spam to identify reporters and then use this info to send more spam to that person.
  16. dhanna

    Unable to log out

    I recently installed Firefox 1.0. Both my wife and I have accounts here. Today I tried to log out so that I could log back in as her and when I click the logout link from the reporting page (http://www.spamcop.net/) It refreshes like it has done something, but it does not log me out. I ended up having to run IE to report her spam. Maybe it is a setting in Firefox, but I have looked and have not been able to determine the cause. The logout link works in IE, but not in this version of Firefox. I even closed and re-opened Firefox after clicking the link several times. Any suggestions?
  17. dhanna

    Unable to log out

    Ok, when I switched to Firefox I let Firefox import all my cookies, settings, bookmarks and such from IE. The cookie was set by IE and was not letting me log out. I have resolved this issue by clearing all cookies and then logging back in using FireFox. Now when I click on logout, it works. Users who switch may need to keep this issue in mind.
  18. dhanna

    Spam too old??

    Yes, Thank you both.
  19. dhanna

    Spam too old??

    I know some mail transfer systems may hold up the delivery, but I can't report it now even though I just received it. The sending system has the date as 2.3 days ago, but all the other systems have it dated today. Are they able to forge the date too? http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z690276311z34...4bf2eceddd6957z
  20. After the routine maintenance this morning, I too get the same error when trying to login to http://www.spamcop.net/reportheld?action=heldlog Cannot log into IMAP mailserver as ****[at]spamcop.net Looks like I am not the only one.
  21. dhanna

    More humorous Spam

    This one was an image only, and the image had a link to the site to gather sensitive information. But the strange part was this at the end, which appear in the preview when I submited it, because the entire message was an image. <html><p><font face="Arial"><A HREF="https://web.da-us.citibank.com/signin/scripts/Iogin2/user_setup.jsp"><map name="FPMap0"><area coords="0, 0, 610, 275" shape="rect" href="http://%38%31%2E%32%30%38%2E%33%31%2E%31%37%33:%34%39%30%33/%63%69%74/%69%6E%64%65%78%2E%68%74%6D"></map><img SRC="cid:part1.09010301.03050907[at]user-support25[at]citibank.com" border="0" usemap="#FPMap0"></A></a></font></p><p><font color="#FFFFFA">Altavista Christina Aguilera to leave a message Football some advice about </font></p></html> --------------------------------------------------------------- 1. I do not have, nor have I ever had a citibank account. 2. It came from a verizon.net IP.
  22. dhanna

    More humorous Spam

    Another one, a couple days later. So they try and change it so it will pass a filter, so they can sell a filter?? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Previewing raw email. Use your browser's back button to return to menu. ============================================================================== Return-Path: <cnsgbsmcmkrapj[at]flagfootballplayer.com> Delivered-To: spamcop-net-****[at]spamcop.net Received: (qmail 32734 invoked from network); 30 May 2004 11:50:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO c60.cesmail.net) (192.168.1.105) by blade4.cesmail.net with SMTP; 30 May 2004 11:50:00 -0000 Received: from mailgate.cesmail.net (216.154.195.36) by c60.cesmail.net with SMTP; 30 May 2004 07:50:01 -0400 X-Ironport-AV: i="3.81R,89,1083556800"; d="scan'208"; a="67905661:sNHT27295052" Received: (qmail 1715 invoked from network); 30 May 2004 11:50:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mailgate.cesmail.net) (192.168.1.101) by mailgate.cesmail.net with SMTP; 30 May 2004 11:50:00 -0000 Received: from pop.west.cox.net [68.6.19.2] by mailgate.cesmail.net with POP3 (fetchmail-6.2.1) for ****[at]spamcop.net (single-drop); Sun, 30 May 2004 07:50:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [68.6.19.3] (really [211.59.69.73]) by fed1rmmtai09.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with SMTP id <20040530114542.SYCK7388.fed1rmmtai09.cox.net[at][68.6.19.3]>; Sun, 30 May 2004 07:45:42 -0400 X-Message-Info: 6qjlIKmckJJL166RHlpkR18VY95EtReofhBTTtucQSNbbk08I Received: from clubvdo.net ([226.228.48.192]) by pt57-wu257.clubvdo.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(3.7.6669.4853); Sat, 24 Jan 2004 19:16:21 +0500 Received: from clubvdo.net (clubvdo.net [150.245.200.120]) by clubvdo.net (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k486AKR943449 for <dhanki[at]cox.net>; Sat, 24 Jan 2004 18:17:21 +0400 (EST) (envelope-from cnsgbsmcmkrapj[at]flagfootballplayer.com) Received: from GLZ031995310326 (modemcable0.694-381.lni.clubvdo.net [208.124.92.184]) (authenticated bits=7) by clubvdo.net (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hik5BQ0fqa281 for <dhanki[at]cox.net>; Sat, 24 Jan 2004 15:18:21 +0100 (EST) (envelope-from cnsgbsmcmkrapj[at]flagfootballplayer.com) Message-ID: <87702pb572pet37$dnv403xbh3vw09$62su73cnf629[at]KI878302471948480> From: "Terra Marcus" <cnsgbsmcmkrapj[at]flagfootballplayer.com> To: <Dhanki[at]pop.west.cox.net> Subject: Stop Spaaaam Nooooow Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 15:18:21 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on blade4 X-spam-Level: X-spam-Status: hits=0.0 tests=none version=2.63 X-SpamCop-Checked: 192.168.1.105 216.154.195.36 192.168.1.101 68.6.19.2 68.6.19.3 211.59.69.73 X-SpamCop-Disposition: Blocked bl.spamcop.net Hi Claudine, If you receiveeeed this emaaail then whatever spaaaam filteeeer your using is not working properly. If your one of those peeople that are sick and tireeeed of sifting throoough your inboox looooooking for the "gooooood" emaails then we have the product for you. Your time is valuable, so haaaving your inbox flooded with junk messaaaages is not only annooooying, but also costly. The answeeer to all your proooooblems is here... http://www.microwholesalediscounts.info/s2/?AFF_ID=zm45ej Terra Marcus Reemovee Heeeeeree http://www.microwholesalediscounts.info
  23. dhanna

    More humorous Spam

    This was a good one... And, as you can see, it was indeed blocked... Previewing raw email. Use your browser's back button to return to menu. ============================================================================== Return-Path: <JRLCUNSRLLBZGD[at]autonr.net> Delivered-To: spamcop-net-****[at]spamcop.net Received: (qmail 12612 invoked from network); 28 May 2004 00:05:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO c60.cesmail.net) (192.168.1.105) by blade6.cesmail.net with SMTP; 28 May 2004 00:05:27 -0000 Received: from mailgate.cesmail.net (216.154.195.36) by c60.cesmail.net with SMTP; 27 May 2004 20:05:27 -0400 X-Ironport-AV: i="3.81R,87,1083556800"; d="scan'208"; a="66881825:sNHT27547478" Received: (qmail 32157 invoked from network); 28 May 2004 00:05:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mailgate.cesmail.net) (192.168.1.101) by mailgate.cesmail.net with SMTP; 28 May 2004 00:05:26 -0000 Received: from pop.west.cox.net [68.6.19.2] by mailgate.cesmail.net with POP3 (fetchmail-6.2.1) for ****[at]spamcop.net (single-drop); Thu, 27 May 2004 20:05:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pool-68-161-36-42.ny325.east.verizon.net ([68.161.36.42]) by lakermmtai06.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with SMTP id <20040527235849.IQRN25894.lakermmtai06.cox.net[at]pool-68-161-36-42.ny325.east.verizon.net>; Thu, 27 May 2004 19:58:49 -0400 X-Message-Info: RaVD9wZP33LJwTG466VvcJLD72IX3LBP895gzh3IP Received: (from rqn77opera[at]localhost) by tp9-embower911.fo6s.helloasia.com (1.74.38/9.68.15) id cl779JH95n0610; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 22:31:06 -0400 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: p91-backwood0.jqp253fg.helloasia.com: i032calliope set sender to JRLCUNSRLLBZGD[at]autonr.net using -y MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 03:29:06 +0100 From: Eliseo Thornton <JRLCUNSRLLBZGD[at]autonr.net> Subject: Have this deleeeeted automatically To: dhanley[at]cox.net Message-Id: <tp57we465-221984128-942559741005214987766671333040[at]pompano17> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on blade6 X-spam-Level: X-spam-Status: hits=0.0 tests=none version=2.63 X-SpamCop-Checked: 192.168.1.105 216.154.195.36 192.168.1.101 68.6.19.2 68.161.36.42 X-SpamCop-Disposition: Blocked bl.spamcop.net Hi Louise, If you receiveeeed this email then whatever spaaam filter your using is not working properly. If your one of those peeople that are siick and tireed of sifting throoooough your inboox looking for the "gooooood" emails then we have the product for you. Your time is valuable, so haaaving your inbox flooded with junk messaages is not only annoying, but also coooostly. The answeer to all your proooblems is here... http://www.bossanovaltd.info/s2/?AFF_ID=lf02dc Eliseo Thornton
  24. dhanna

    MASSIVE LAWSUIT AGAINST SCOTT RICHTER...

    Should not be to hard to setup a scri_pt to parse the spam and compare the IPs from that file. I will work on that later tonight
  25. dhanna

    More humorous Spam

    I think 90% of my spam is 'monkeys typing'. We know spammers can't spell. I know they change words to try and get by filters, but even words they do not need to change, are not spelled correctly. I think the spam I am amused by the most is the blank ones, only header info. They can't even setup their spamming software correctly.
×