Jump to content

Ricardo_63

Members
  • Content Count

    6
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About Ricardo_63

  • Rank
    Newbie
  1. Ricardo_63

    ISP has indicated spam will cease

    Based on you hypothesis about spam reason is clearly money and can concluded behind system structure is not regardless to a little corporate, without any respect and totally disloyal . Therefore it can concluded component of spammers began from IT managers (how about ISP? no carry out any responsibilities??). If spammer is based about money what is the relationship between normal services as hosting and others and spam extra money? As could be vertical structure, IT manager is the smaller portion of the spam business money share, as it could continues to the top of structure how much is the rate share? Why is not regulated?? who controls ? Are you sure is spam about money?
  2. Ricardo_63

    ISP has indicated spam will cease

    If Spamcop is and owes to: “spam complaints a day and is supported by hundreds of thousands of users, a knowledgeable volunteer community, and a professional staff” Why to be more condescending with ISP?? IT manager should be step forward monitoring system and not contributed to and for spam moreover when increase day by day.
  3. Ricardo_63

    ISP has indicated spam will cease

    Absolutely agree, there where a lot of way and almost in advantage of spammers, therefore should be more stricter on "cease" rules and policies. Without be more stronger and more condescending spammer will always be step forward.
  4. Ricardo_63

    ISP has indicated spam will cease

    Thanks, absolutely agree with your answer
  5. Ricardo_63

    ISP has indicated spam will cease

    Hi and many thanks to everyone.. At first I’m totally agree with Petzl based on the following point; Clearly it seems this situation happens to many users, and it seems administrator action by report backs isn’t enough, moreover when “Anyone can disable SpamCop Block List including spammers” it seems a weak follow up and control from SPAMCOP. By the other way, if my understanding is correct there are 2 way for sending spam; 1. From users could have a Trojan virus on their PC . 2. From ISP servers where could be hacked (by using robot to scan ports and call to software to start send spam mail by using similar as TELNET or others. So regardless to user PC 6 or 8 hour is enough time to stop, but when is regardless to server issue it mean irresponsibility and should be ZERO tolerance.
  6. Many times when reported a spam is rejected by the reason of "ISP has indicated spam will cease... " Because it continues receiving spam from IPS where have indicated as "will cease". Will Spamcop change this action?? no sense if still receiving spam.
×