Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About MIG

  • Rank
  1. Excellent DisplayName, thanks for posting. Not really my tip but I'll take acknowledgment
  2. DN, here's the link where SC BIG team members give the real reasons for not posting spam full source data [ http://forum.spamcop.net/topic/27950-reporting-not-working-mainbody/ ], it's a good read
  3. Hi GnaarlyMarly, thanks, however, hmmm, I'm not so attached to OL to much around installing OL2010/2003, in fact, I'm close to giving OL the boot. I don't get spam with (Seamonkey/Gmail/Yahoo), generally I muck around with OL to burn as many spammers as possible, but, dog says I'd be better off spending time with her, she's never wrong
  4. , let us know how it goes & just a little fyi, the SC Forum "Big Team" encourage us to not post full spam data in the forum, they prefer the link that's generated when a spam is processed, even if the parsing spits out errors, still post the link with whatever the issue is that's causing us to report/request help. I think, from memory, filling up the forum with full spam source data hurts their eyes or maybe it's their scrolling finger gets tired
  5. Hi GnarlyMarly, using web Outlook Mail - no go, using Outlook 2016 app/windows - no go, using (MS) Mail and Calendar, no go. Process: create email, select spam mail (to drag & drop) - immediately closes the draft email - none of these allow "drag & drop", having said that I'm not sure I'm using the same " outlook windows application " you've referred to; which "outlook windows application" specifically are you referring to? Re "started using program called fetchmail over imap and a perl scri_pt to embed the email into an attachment", cor!
  6. Hi, Display Name, not sure if this will help, (someone here & maybe doco) suggested removing from the 1st [ Received: from DM5PR19MB1033.namprd19.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:3:ef::17) by DM5PR19MB1034.namprd19.prod.outlook.com with HTTPS via DM5PR04CA0055.NAMPRD04.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 14:05:18 +0000] however, I notice the spam msg you're querying has 3 [Received: from etc] I removed the first 2 [Received: from etc] & submitted to spamcop - https://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z6499543863za669acef9883e3921fd95624a079faefz, if it was submitted within the timeframe it would have been directed to abuse@zohocorp.com
  7. Hello Gnarlymarley, well you said it loud enough for me to hear Re your method, are you speaking about https://outlook.live.com/mail/ or app based Outlook mail? I've just tried via web based mail, not possible. Will try app based & update... Cheers.
  8. & I'm deeply grateful for that, your help & input has been invaluablešŸ˜Š
  9. Laughing! Too true! & [a tall building sticking up above the fag] really? Is that old Irish? Back to the serious topic, struggling to comprehend Ms would enable spammers..
  10. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A sample of mindless MS response: "This is Joan, I am one of the Supervisors. Outlook Engineering is updating Outlook.com on the web. The new Mail experience is the result of a long-running Beta and feedback from millions of Outlook.com customers. Although, there is no option to permanently return to the previous version, you can use the Classic version for the time being. I am always on your side to help. Best Regards, Joan, Outlook.com Support" -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Re: changing mail apps, I do use others, don't get any spam to report/hunt down & destroy
  11. Re, let MS know, I have, via direct contact & UV Forum, there's only so much slamming my head into a brick wall that I can tolerate.
  12. Lking, you've made my day! Here I was thinking you could see/do stuff that I had yet to learn... So you are saying, even using OL-Classic, the "extract" of source data is not formatted/formatting correctly for SpamCop...?
  13. After re-reading your last post Lking, I re-read https://www.spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/368.html, & decided, based on that info & what you've written the "successful" submissions (I thought) must not be successful, therefore, I decided to forward a spam email via submit.xxxxxxxxxx@spam.spamcop.net - result: [SpamCop encountered errors while saving spam for processing:SpamCop could not find your spam message in this email] When I look at the submission it sure as hell looks like a whole lot of spam to me.... I don't know what I don't know xxxx = unique id
  14. Me again Lking - http://forum.spamcop.net/topic/28485-new-outlook-update/ sounds same/similar.... sadly
  15. MIG

    New Outlook Update

    Hello Perthsworst & crew - same sorry experience - http://forum.spamcop.net/topic/29863-unable-to-submit-spam-this-header-is-incomplete-please-supply-full-headers-of-the-spam-etc/