.jpg.e175c90cdd2cf2938cfdc6d56ee7c9d1.jpg)
MIG
-
Posts
353 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by MIG
-
-
1 minute ago, HeatherReid43 said:
you are funny!
& you've made me😂
All 🦗s are funny, look at me, is that anything other than funny? If you looked like that you'd know how funny you are 'cause people would laugh at you every time they saw you, or squash you!
Happens to funny old G🦗H every time I venture off the grass🤣
😉
-
2 minutes ago, HeatherReid43 said:
info@jpcert.or.jp
Excellent!
-
1 hour ago, HeatherReid43 said:
today, after a long amount of time, i again received 2 419 spam emails
something has revived from the dead grave
Hello HeatherReid43,
I read 2419, 😱, immediately began thinking of s🔫lutions to keep💩☠⚰.
Rereading, relieved it's only two!
Are you adding hostmaster@nic.ad.jp (with notes) to the SC reporting distributions?
Cheers!
G🦗H
-
On 5/24/2019 at 10:49 PM, RobiBue said:
if I use my "potaroo.net"
This potaroo
RobiBue?
G🤗H
-
The International Consumer Protection Enforcement Network (ICPEN)
Membership organisation consisting of consumer protection law enforcement authorities from across the globe.
Multiple spam fighting resources / contacts - https://www.icpen.org/avoiding-scams
Cheers!
G🦗H
-
Another resource, associated with FTC,
https://www.consumer.ftc.gov/articles/how-recognize-and-avoid-phishing-scams#report
How to report phishing
If you got a phishing email or text message, report it. The information you give can help fight the scammers.
Step 1. If you got a phishing email, forward it to the FTC at spam@uce.gov and to the Anti-Phishing Working Group at reportphishing@apwg.org. If you got a phishing text message, forward it to spam (7726).
Step 2. Report the phishing attack to the FTC at ftc.gov/complaint redirects to a nifty form:
https://www.ftccomplaintassistant.gov/Details#crnt
Happy fighting!
G🦗H
-
Hey RadicalDad,
Addressing:
34.216.216.33 "parser properly recognizing Sparkpost was the source of the email. But then Spamcop decided amazonaws was the correct reporting address"
https://www.talosintelligence.com/reputation_center/lookup?search=34.216.216.33
Cheers
G🦗H
-
Hey Hank,
I parsed the spam using an account without Mailhosts
https://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z6549475009zed08ca727fef033d7a7791ddc92d5159z
Cheers!
G🦗H
-
Got it Master,
Thank you!
Give feedback on this post:
Excellent!
Cheers!
G🦗H
-
Hello Master,
Still awake?
Thanks for the update!
Windows/FF, me too. Scam & Fake pages, all good, except, another selection must be made for Send to work🤔
I'll try a couple of other browsers & post back.
G🦗H really wants to do this, get so little spam these days it makes me grumpy😡
Gunna chk the difference b/w "give feedback on this post" & "give feedback on this page"
Cheers!
G🦗H
-
12 hours ago, Lking said:
I report the page as spam.
Hello Master, you have that title for a reason🙇!
Followup question: "report page as spam"
Which options do you choose please?
"Scams & Fake pages"
& then ?
Thanks for sharing and cheers!
G🦗H
-
1 hour ago, Rajasekar.svel said:
Thank you very much for the reply. I've raised the request over there.
Hello Rajasekar.svel,
We happy to help. Hope you get the answers!
Cheers
G🦗H
-
Hello Rajasekar.svel,
I've just answered your other post, so I'll answer this here as it's clearer what's required.
It might be best to send thru a request to SpamCop Admin, the following link/page: https://www.spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/401.html How can I contact a SpamCop representative, at the very bottom of the page: "Other reasons for contact", briefly explain what you've posted here, I'm sure the SpamCop Admins will assist.
Cheers
G🦗H
-
Well, there you go, just removed the top two [ Received: etc ] hops & the spam parsed just fine, so,
G🦗H wrong, apologies Rajasekar.svel, your (remove first two [ Received: etc ]) method is correct. Removing (first one [ Received: etc ] ) also results in a true parse.
Cheers!
G🦗H
-
Hey Rajasekar.svel,
Without a working tracking URL it's a little difficult to offer commentary, however, are you posting that you've had a positive result from Zoho Abuse Monitoring Desk?
In which case super!
If I've misunderstood, please post a working SC tracking URL?
Also, just for accuracy, SCA advise: remove the 1st/first [ Received: etc to +0000]
It may well be that removing the top two [ Received: etc ] is also effective, but (imo) I don't think so, I'll test this method & post back.
Cheers!
G🦗H
-
Hey Petzl,
There's quite a few using this method.
I've noticed Hetzner do take action on receipt of submission/s.
Cheers!
G🦗H
-
Hey Gnarlymarley,
I'm all for understanding👍
No, I wasn't referring to https://www.spamcop.net/sc?action=showroute x
I was suggesting a pinned topic/table exist in SC Forum, collating addresses that SC doesn't identify BUT SC members have shown to be effective spam fighting endpoints.
Cheers!
G🦗H
-
Hello All,
The idea for an address table/pinned topic, was not that it was open to anyone to post the info, rather it was/is a repository of all "effective/helpful" addresses SC parser is not identifying, managed by SCFA.
(I offered to do the grunt work if SCF Admins or whomever currently carries the work/maintenance burden wanted some willing assistance). This translates to, the table/topic existing, any identified addresses forwarded to SCFA who'd then update the table/pinned topic.
Cheers G🦗H
-
23 hours ago, HeatherReid43 said:
G🦗H may be wrong but for: 2402:bc00:0:a216:0:0:19:124, G🦗H gets: abuse@ene.megaegg.ne.jp
-
4 hours ago, lisati said:
Having some kind of table for us to use does sound like it might have some merit. There's also a section of this forum that some contributors use to submit updates and corrections. under Spamcop Reporting Help -> Routing/Report Address issues
Hey Klappa & Lisati,
Yep, the SCR Help R&RA is there, is a good resource, and (my understanding) is that it's for corrections, whereas, G🦗H sees the pinned table as a repository of additional addresses, built from info posted by SCF members who, every so often mention (an address) as being an effective end point when they reached out for assistance with knocking off a spammers head🤬
-
On 5/14/2019 at 7:43 AM, petzl said:
because SC admin admin sent it to whomever in L3
Thanks Petzl,
Alice broke the looking glassG🦗H
-
11 hours ago, lisati said:
That's OK. I first noticed changes to the way Yahoo emails were being processed a couple of years ago, after Yahoo changed something at their end which seemed to break regular processing.
Thank you Lisati,
G🦗H
-
Nifty tool, automatic "check email address" popup when visiting sites that have had data breaches.
Breach data provided by HaveIBeenPwned.
Pulled up a site I've never heard of, let alone knew I was registered on😒
G🦗H
https://www.bankinfosecurity.com/breach-verificationsio-exposes-763-million-records-a-12158
-
10 hours ago, petzl said:
because level 3 have told them not to send SC reports to the registered abuse address
Thank you Petzl,
"them" = ?
Why then did L3 send the report to the registered abuse address and notify me?
G🦗H feels like Alice...
reportphishing@apwg.org
in SpamCop Lounge
Posted · Edited by MIG
1. You're very welcome Lisati👍
2. Interesting, I've never had an issue with spamATuce.gov, sometimes reportATsubmit.spamDOTacmaDOTgovDOTau spits back a spam because: acma server detects it as "spam"🙄!
Cheers!
G🦗H