Jump to content

ANGEL

Members
  • Content Count

    21
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About ANGEL

  • Rank
    Member

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Hello Borgholio, I think I've found/struck same issue/s [http://forum.spamcop.net/topic/30224-something-wrong-with-outlook-reporting/?page=2&tab=comments#comment-129011], hoping the SCF experts/experienced team members will clarify.... It's certainly interesting having [SC distribution] choices, I'd just like to know which parsing method to choose for the most accurate report... Tracking your post in case the answers appearand hoping, SCAdmin will publish a V5 "features" guide when they recover from the update-long-haul
  2. RobiBue, you may be able to answer my question please (specific to SCv5)(IPv6 624) With V5, do we no longer have to "cut" 1st [Received: from PU1APC01HT007.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com(2603:10a6:800:92::20) blah, blah, blah, Mon, 14 Jan 2019 06:08:02 +0000] ? instead post to parser ENTIRE source data? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- And, anyone who's game may be able to answer: if the answer's "yes"; why parsing the entire source data would result in different [Reports sent to] distributions? https://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z6513483714z596b7c076a2121c3ce82e632cf6e31a3z as opposed to parsing modified source data [Reports sent to] distributions https://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z6513484404zf0c78fe42b97237ee395ad8a37facc9cz Thanks in advance!
  3. Once again Gnarleymarley, thank you, clarification and logical explanation is very helpful. I thought I was providing "a" tracking url. Did not understand the distinction. Many thanks & cheers.
  4. Thank you Gnarleymarly, however, I'm a tad confused: a) you responded to my original post (& I took from your reply) you interrogated the url I posted - no? b) when I go to [ https://www.spamcop.net/w3m?i=z6898801339z8c25e92a12dc86c774a950d737412c13z ] & select [Show how SpamCop traced this message] redirects to https://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z6512755812z8ee73d74322c131f8ca885cc287a03fcz, imo, gets to the same result, therefore, not much difference. But, I'm happy to take on the learning, thank you😊
  5. Am I missing something? This is what I posted: "Not sure if an example is needed, posting just in case:" https://www.spamcop.net/w3m?i=z6898801339z8c25e92a12dc86c774a950d737412c13z
  6. Thanks Lking, that adds to the helpful info posted by Gnarleymarley. Not that it's welcome info. (imo) It means they are: rich, dumb, business owners🤢
  7. Like the url I referenced when I submitted the issue Petzl? Please refer to attached image - ✔️ URL ✔️
  8. Re [There have been a number of spammers that appear to purchase a whole entire network range just so they can be the abuse contact listed in the whois] Are they really: - that rich? - that dumb? -
  9. Hi Petzl, what does "Help if you sent a tracking URL" mean please?
  10. Thank you Gnarlymarley, Your answer is exactly the information I needed & clarifies the issue Re [As soon as those are found out..], is there anything we [SC] users can do/need to do, to facilitate [action by SC deputies](apart from submitting spam to SC)?
  11. Question re: SC report auto-distribution; not any address manually entered in [User Notification] field. Are SC reports ever directed to the "source" of the spam? Not sure if an example is needed, posting just in case: https://www.spamcop.net/w3m?i=z6898801339z8c25e92a12dc86c774a950d737412c13z Cheers.
  12. Thank you Lking!!, Re "I do not forward one account to another", me neither, however, I have setup the other MH's/email addresses, just to get some "actual" experience with the process, it all fits together better, in my brain, if I can do it as well as read it. And, I've dug out my cuisenaire rods to assist Back to your elaborate explanation, you sure are creative, busboy at greasyspoon indeed! I wonder if there is such a place? I wonder if I'd eat there? Probably 2015 - the bit that confused me "soon, all SpamCop users will be required to use this new system", as a newbie, I created a SC account, no prob, after some days I read the help, MH config etc, and at that stage could not work out how I'd been able to sign in/setup so easily, if the MHC was required, given it is way past 2015. As you've probably concluded, I get confused easily, I failed Comp Sci, well not failed technically, just sent my teachers spare in the process of getting thru...That's why patient, specific, analytical folks such as yourself are gold. Thanks again!
  13. Hello LKing, Thank you! I did read "one host covered more than 1 email address..", got a bit confused, that's when I tried to register the 2nd email address - the doco that references: Example 1: A, B, C & Example 2: A, B, C, lead to some of the confusion... Secondly, the date (2015 ?) of the "Configure Mail Hosts" "SpamCop is undergoing a major renovation... etc", " Soon, all SpamCop users will be required to use this new system", added to confusion... For this exercise, as you twigged, I do have 1 host & 3 mail addresses, my mistake was assuming I had to add each email address. 3 hosts, 3 emails addresses. I always do check the parser before sending/submitting, not sure tho what your advice is suggesting I will find specific to the mail host issue, may I ask please if you'd elaborate on that point please? As always, very appreciative of your helpful advice, many thanks😊
  14. Setup - Mailhost for 1 email account, 1st problem - no field to add 2nd email address (for same host), so > Setup Mailhost for 2nd email account - got the following "information" https://www.spamcop.net/mcgi host xxxx:xxxx:x:xx:0:0:0:xx (getting name) no name Test email processed succesfully. xxxx's replaced actual "Relaying IPsv6" Help please - what an I missing? (be nice)😉
×