Jump to content


Forum Admin
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Lking

  1. warned, blocked and post moved from "How To Use"
  2. warned, blocked and post moved from "How To Use"
  3. That is much better At the bottom of the report is the bad news. "Report would be sent to network-abuse{AT}google{DOT}com" If you do a local search (tool top right of each screen) you will find several related post about google frustration. If memory serves there are also several suggestions for additional actions you could take, with variable results.
  4. @denbyhank you for trying to provide a Tracking URL. The Report id can only be seen by you. The Tracking URL can be found either in the at the top of the reporting page or in the email notification received from SC if you submitted the spam as an attachment. an example would look like
  5. @mgolden as you may have noticed, spammers do visit this forum. It can be assumed they scrap email addresses they find. I tried to remove your wife's email from your post. You did provide the tracking URL, thank you, so there was no point to including the header of the spam (which exposed your wife's email) in your post There does seem to be some network issues right now. I also just got a 500 error. Try later to update your mailhost..
  6. Lking

    SpamCop says it's too old, it's not

    If you search for "Tracking URL" (including the quotes) using the search tool, top right of each page, you will find 112 local references to "Tracking URL" that may be more helpful than a internet wide search.
  7. Lking

    SpamCop says it's too old, it's not

    As others suggested, a Tracking URL would be more helpful. In addition to the offending email others can see what the parser did. When others follow the Tracking URL SC redacts the email removing you email so you don't have to. By not including the raw email in the forum, its content is not crawled by bots and indexed giving visibility to the spammer.
  8. Lking

    Three Ways to Report spam

    We have tried. In most browsers you will see that SCBL is underlined. if you slowly mouse over SCBL a small window will appear. HTH
  9. Lking

    OVH.Net spam ?

    $$$$ The US Congress is asking the same question. The answer is "Their business model." The real question is how to control the problem in a open society.
  10. Lking

    Is there a SpamCop Outage

    That sounds like a security/permissions setting.
  11. Lking

    Is there a SpamCop Outage

    Petzl I just logged in for here.
  12. Lking

    Can SpamCop be used for...

    Did you read https://www.spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/14.html? Scroll down to Messages which may be reported: I understand your frustration. Every once in a while one of my domains cycle through the spammer's list of forged "FROM:" or "REPLY:" Although the admin of the domain receiving the original spam must not have a clue about the difference between FROM: and the IP address of the real source, reporting their invalid bounce messages my get their attention. If you are nice you could include a note in the spam Report explaining the difference.
  13. Lking

    Reporting spam has no effect

    https://www.spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/297.html scroll down to SCBL rules.
  14. That should work. Or goto <Browse> <Staff> and PM Richard
  15. The system obviously does not like your attachment. You can recover the tracking URL by logging into your reporting account and clicking on the <Past Reports> tab This will list "Report Numbers? when you select the correct report the Tracking URL will be part of the next screen.
  16. "What we have here is a failure to communicate" An example of a tracking URL is https://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z6634628358z460dafae0c54205ace1fe027dc2ff311z This can be found near the top of the screen after you submit the spam. If you submit by email the tracing URL is the link sent to you to review and complete/submit your spam. In my example above you will see the tracking URL on the third line. IF we had access to the tracking URL someone could cut and past the body of the spam into google translate and see why your domain is in the body.
  17. If I understand the issue correctly without a Tracking URL another thing to consider is, if your email and domain are on the same host and IP. As you know spamcop looks at IPs not domain names directly. Having your domain listed in a spam is odd. spam I have received, even those requesting to buy one of my domains, don't include the domain in the body. In any case your point is well taken. If the domain in the body of the spam is the same as a domain in your mailhost configuration, the solution should be relative straight forward. I would suggest a post in New Feature Request with a Tracking URL as an example to illustrate your request/suggestion.
  18. Lking

    New spammer trick?

    with the double header I think things have gotten confused. @gnarlymarley without knowing @Spamnophobic 's 16 digit code "they" could not have sent to the reporting address. UNLESS they replied to a spam report with the following sequence: @Spamnophobic a spam (email #1) and reported it to spamcop (email #2) spamcop sent a spam report to the the source (email #3) the spammer/his ISP... received email #3 and auto responded (?) with email #4 sent to a coded address at spamcop spamcop received email #4 send to a coded mail box associated with the spam report (email #3) and forwarded the email to @Spamnophobic @Spamnophobic received email #4 which has the spamcop connection hidden and thinking it is spam @Spamnophobic reports email #4 The reporting of email #4 generates the tracking URL above. It has been a really long time sense I have received a reply to an spam report. Looking at the full email in the tracking URL there are spamcop.net ironpost references in both headers (at the top and bottom of the email) to paraphrase Cicero, Mark Twain, Blaise Pascal 'If I had more time this would have been shorter.'
  19. Lking

    SpamCop says it's too old, it's not

    Of course the spammer has no control over thr date entered by your ISP or other servers in the chain after their ISP. A spammer can of course forge the "Date:" header entry visible to all, and if they control their ISP they could control the date in the first "Received:" line in the header visible using the source with a ctrl-U The SpamCop parser used the dates contained in the "Received:" header lines, checking for logical sequence and age. If a date is questionable, I have see 'possible forgery' Which dates are you looking at? An example of the header, using a Tracking URL would be helpful.
  20. Lking

    Emails not being received

    Reading other threads in this forum, SpamCop email System & Accounts should be informative. For example: SpamCop Email Service Changes When SpamCop and the SCBL was sold to CISCO inc this forum and the email system were retained as a legacy. with advice to all email account holders to find other email servers. After a coupe of years the system was reduced to "forwarding only." no SpamCop filtering. As I remember, a couple of years ago forwarding was also discontinued, though the email domain remained. Perhaps someone who has retained a SpamCop email address could add to the current status. As noted in the link above, SpamCop Email System & Accounts have gently been going away sense August 2014.
  21. Lking

    Emails not being received

    @Hatespam~~ just to be sure, which spamcop account are you referring too? The spamcop forum? Your spamcop reporting account? or an old {AT}spamcop.net email account? Having posted to an old troll/spammer's thread, your request is not clear.
  22. Lking

    Spamcop captcha is not loading

    Without any additional reports an IP will automatically be removed from the SCBL after 24 hours.
  23. Lking


    I do not think so. Your report must me one of many/several reports to add an IP to the blocklist. Of course when you report you can not know if your report is the first and only report or the report that gets the sender added to the blocklist. See https://www.spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/297.html scroll down to "SCBL Rules"
  24. Lking


    Getresponse is an online marketing company. The number of reports compared to the total number of email send must be low. I do not know, but I am guessing that getresponse has ask SpamCop not to send spam reports and that is why sending reports is disabled. That does not keep SpamCop from collecting reports about the IP and adding their IP to the blocklist IF the number of reports or email received by a spam trap is high enough.