Forum Admin
  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About Lking

  • Rank
    Been There

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
  • ICQ

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
    Colorado, USA

Recent Profile Visitors

2,038 profile views
  1. It has been so long I don't remember what your question was. In the end a report would have been sent to a known source of spam, so to save bandwidth the report was devnulled.
  2. If you follow the link in your post you will see that IP is no longer listed. However, you should know that the IP was listed because someone there has send enough to people or spam traps to get the IP listed on the block list. People receiving email from the given IP have reported the email to SpamCop. When enough reports or spam trap hits are received, the IP will be listed. Although you may want to receive email from this IP, others do not.
  3. ** The following was originally posted by new member "benno" copied here to make the question more accessible. ** Dear Sirs, Our customer send email to my colleague was reported as spam and got bounce back message as below: The original message was received at Mon, 13 Mar 2017 16:11:10 -0400 from [] *** ATTENTION *** This email is being returned to you because the remote server would not or could not accept the message. The registeredsite servers are just reporting to you what happened and are not the source of the problem. The address which was undeliverable is in the section labeled: "----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----". The reason your mail is being returned to you is in the section labeled: "----- Transcript of Session Follows -----". This section describes the specific reason your e-mail could not be delivered. Please direct further questions regarding this message to your e-mail administrator. --Registeredsite Postmaster ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- <> (reason: 550-"JunkMail rejected - []:58304) ----- Transcript of session follows ----- ... while talking to >>> DATA <<< 550-"JunkMail rejected - []:58304 <<< 550 is in an RBL, see Blocked - see" 550 5.1.1 <>... User unknown 451 4.4.1 reply: read error from --Unquote-- Can you please help to remove from your block list?? Thank you. Benno Mou
  4. I moved your post Statistic to the Lounge.  I think that would be a better place for your discussion.  "Reporting Help" should be reserved for problems with reporting spam.

    Hope this does not cause you any trouble.

  5. Not to banal or obvious, but have you done a search in the forum or read the help on the site to learn that the SC block list blocks IP addresses not domains and is dynamic so that blocking of a given IP address may come and go depending the number and grouping of reports/hits on traps. Perhaps a review of Spammer Rules would explain your conversation with "Andrew" quadranet and lighten the mood of this thread before it goes in the ditch. Reading this forum and comparing the decorum with some other discussion groups may reveal a positive difference.
  6. Yep I agree. another godaddy domain.

  7. That of course is your choice. However making you unique reporting email public, may compromise the integrity all the spam submitted using this reporting address.
  8. I would suggest that you contact SC and have them assign a new unique email address for your submit account. You have exposed your current one twice now and this forum is scanned/scrapped to pickup that type of information. The examples you provided are not the same. Your in your OP the email from SC is dated "Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2017 09:37:06 +0000 (GMT) " The attached spam which has no body (AND CAUSES THE ERROR) is dated " Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2017 09:37:06 +0000 (GMT) " Your second example, the SC email to you is dated " Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2017 14:04:34 +0000 (GMT) " At the bottom following Again the header of your spam submission this time dated " Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2017 14:04:34 +0000 (GMT) " which does not appear to have a proper body. So you have provided two examples that appear to me to have the same problem no properly formatted attachments. I would look at the procedure/applications you use to submit spam and evaluate what has chanced to cause these errors. Looking at your second post, is an example of why we prefer that people do NOT post copies of spam in this forum. throughout your post are links to "infomarketingemail" and other spammer web pages and graphics all of with may be harmful to anyone who clicks on them. In lieu of editing your post to break each link I am going to delete a large chunk to prevent SEO scanners from finding the links to spammer websites and prevent the unwise from following the links.
  9. I agree with Gnarlymarley and mungged your 16 unque address (XxXxX..). If you posted the entire message it would appear that the spam submitted to SC did not have a body. The last line you quoted "x-rpcampaign:..." should be followed by a blank line and then the body of the email. This could be due to the original email being incorrectly formatted and not having a body or the email application you are using did not properly attach the email you were submitting. I would guess the first, assuming you have been using the same process to submit spam for sometime.
  10. Yes there seems to have been a hiccup in the database. Seems to be working OK now. Who knows. I would just clear everything and if you still have spam from today submit them again.
  11. Reports are bounced They have requested SC not send reports, for whatever reason There is evidence that the reports are passed on to the spammer
  12. Login to your reporting account and go to <preferences> <Reporting preferences> and scroll down to "spam Munging" There are three options. JMHO but I am not sure what difference it makes. I have chosen to "Leave the spam copies intact" My reasoning is that the spammer already has my email address. The only thing they learn is ~ I reported their email to me as spam. If they wash my email from their list, this is good. If they choose to flood me with spam they will reveal which IP and domains they have at their disposal. That too is good. I also believe Spammer Rule #3 is true: "Spammers are stupid" See. Either action is more effort than any spammer will bother to do. So with SpamCop removing your full email, with only Morg2 which domain do they send the email to? gmail? aol? msn? Its like knowing only someone's first name and trying to find them in the NYC phonebook. If you use the web page to submit spam you could edit the Subject line after pasting the email into the block.
  13. To be clear, the bounce email sent to you is spam sent to you. Although the email included in the bounce email is spam it is not your spam, and should not be reported by you (except as part of the bounce email). If the original spam were to be separately sent to SpamCop by you, your mailhost settings would cause the submission to be rejected. Unfortunately, that does not do what you intend. The SpamCop blocklist is a dynamic list of offending IP addresses that reflects resent/continuing spam from those IPs. Historical, older evidence, is not used. For example spam more than two days old is rejected by the parser. See my earlier post in this thread.
  14. The only advantage I can see is that it slows down probes of a login system. In addition to just the time to process two vs one screen, it would not be hard to slow roll repeated password tries for a given username. You wouldn't want to look up username and slow roll sending the password screen for bad usernames. That would reveal when they got the first part correct.