-
Posts
31,653 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Lking
-
-
5 hours ago, kolor said:
Thanks means I should report this email to spamcop. or not .
Yes I would report this spam.
-
2 hours ago, kolor said:
where is link to nospammer.net .What is this .I'm confused .???
In the body of the emial
<DIV><a style=3D"color: blue; background-color: ffffdd" href=3D"http://www.nospammer.net/SpamSubmission/SubmitSpam?id=3DI3QGAH0GXWB= nRmpfeUJ0RQ__&sig=3De340MBnYVsRoIzFtaiVlcHl4NCx2MTNwEzZfBg__"> If this email is not spam, click here to submit the signatures to FortiGuar= d - AntiSpam Service. </a></DIV>
as indicated in the report
Quote(Administrator of network hosting website referenced in spam)
-
The issue is two different but related problems. As you may have noticed there is a difference between the base domain, "SpamCop.net" and the SUB domain "forum.spamcop.net'
SpamCop.net is perhaps the more stable of the two. However, when SpamCop was bough by Cisco maintenance of the user interface became a lower priority. In fairness, before the change in ownership there were issues with dead links to the forum were creeping into SpamCop.net (as I remember).
The forum is a somewhat different issue of evolution. The forum has always been a user volunteer supported operation. Volunteers have had varying degrees of access, control and time given to the forum. With the changing "personal" several initiatives to improve/structure the wealth of information and history in the forum have been started and abandoned. Add to this the need to change the underlying software forum software and database has resulted in an uncounted number of broken links.
All a sad but true result of an irregularly maintained system that is +40(?) years old.
-
You might try stop-spoofing@amazon.com
-
Don't forget to leave the reuired blank line at the end of the header
-
5 minutes ago, RobiBue said:
Ah, that's probably why I got this error a few mins ago:
True story.. My error.
-
The way the system works is sometimes confusing. When you are logged in to SpamCop and follow a tracking URL to look at a report you see the un munged report. If you log out and follow the tracking URL, you will see the munged report others see as RubiBue reported above.
-
31 minutes ago, hank said:
onfirming an email address is valid and thus saleable to other spammers.
Rule #3: Spammers are stupid. "Hay fellow spammers here is a validated email address!" How do you know it is valid? " They reported my email (spam) to this address"
-
Sorry about the tags. mindless error on my part.
-
18 hours ago, Hanco said:
Any ideas how to help them get onto those lists?
Perhaps others do, I do not.
-
3 hours ago, Hanco said:
gets on blacklists like SURBL.
Different block list, different objectives, different rules.
-
On 10/3/2019 at 10:07 AM, Shoo said:
I get a "No Data Found" message.
I don't think that configuration of you mailhost is the cause of that problem. From your OP I take it that you are using the SC web form to submit. What mail application are you using to get the spam? Some do not give you the header without modification, which causes the reported problem.
-
10 hours ago, Hanco said:
That’s me and these reports I send for sure. Avg reporting time 2 hrs now. Very fresh!
When the "Reporting Time" was added to the screen, there were lots of threads about the accuracy. Seems to fall to 2 hrs and sticks there.
10 hours ago, Hanco said:P address will never become blacklisted through the reports I send?
And why should they??? They don's SEND any spam. Remember the objective of the SCBL is to block/filter incoming spam, not rate all the IP in the world. In the beginning spammers would include phony links to NY Times/ Washington Post, etc. to make it look like the spamvertised product was valid. A dynamic process.
10 hours ago, Hanco said:I hope someone else is receiving the junk I get
Thanks. I am fairly sure that in spite of the view from your end of the "fire hose" 1k - 100k others are receiving spam for the same IP, it only takes a couple of live reports. And of course there are all the spam traps which are heavily weighted..
-
Lets start with the SCBL deals with IP addresses not domain names. As for which IPs are blocked, have you looked at https://www.spamcop.net/spamstats.shtml or https://www.spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/351.html
3 hours ago, Hanco said:wish the blacklisting was faster.
Have you looked at https://www.spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/297.html scroll down to "Rules" Speed all depends.
-
23 minutes ago, Tesseract said:
saved "unreported" spam from the last few months
Of course anything over two days old will be rejected by SC
-
That is it. For next time you should take a look at some of the older post if this forum to see what has become the defacto standard format. Look at "Ethyl's" ( C2H5OH ) as a long time contributor.
-
4 hours ago, Shoo said:
When I view the message source, I'm not sure where the header ends and the "decoded email body" starts.
The header end with the first blank line.
From: "Lisette Neira" <lneira@century-group.com> Reply-To: "Lisette Neira" <reply_lozwwn_esqpwiya_o@cp20.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html;charset=Windows-1252 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAABgr/Be80R5mPNEkVeDRJFXE0SOroNEkVdw== X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrNqMTGxcIABLo3o6bFGiyYxWmx78B3FgdGj+Mv3jMFMEZx+OWXKAQXJOYmcGT07L7AVsBQAaIaGBlWMcrnlpYbFmckFpckJhYVpxelpuYVFOWn6JblGoCA0SZGqOE7GLdflDnFKCklzpsQMS1WSKAYaGBGaV5JalF8UWlOavErRnEORiVh3pkgWZ7MvJLizHSYjAQHk5IIr03U5FghXqBNCCmpBkar1Lv51bzrtwc9u+OfzT/fM680kaG/U3mraYz/EqZ3R+Lm7JNg6z909lqu7TtluzYj7wkXZ2S/S07ieFe/33L7Lc8mpwJZu5uyYYEu2nEqOvx+s3/0eu4qvc/QKeJ55GLw3QsTfmavV5X5LLAnUPSUnMmPHfqnuOeHnv9xwYLDaMKWtwxKHkosQO8bajEXFScCAMcuQddOAQAA <!-- X-Campaign: 38293016/84269892/21719015952 --> <style> .dvPreheader { display: none !important; mso-hide: all; }</style><div class="dvPreheader" style="display: none !important; mso-hide:all;">This month's sample of our top talent currently available for new opportunities. Contact me today to learn more.</div>
-
6 minutes ago, Hanco said:
Would be good for the tracking link to be available in “Past Reports” (I had to recreate for my forum post above)
When using the web form to submit spam, after pasting the spam in the box and clicking <Process spam> the tracking URL is at the top of the next screen.
-
Hanco, when I follow your Reporting URL I get
QuoteReport spam to:Re: 2603:10b6:0:52:0:0:0:29 (Administrator of network where email originates)
To: report_spam@hotmail.com (Notes)Re: http://bulkoffers.win/unsub?m=GVY%2FULisjkPf0IM... (Administrator of network hosting website referenced in spam)
To: abuse@vpsnet.lt (Notes)normal completion. Follow your Tracking URL again. Next time try refreshing your browser. Let us know the results.
-
If someone would provide a Tracking URL it would help others evaluate the problem.
I do not remember seeing any evidence of browser based issues. On the other hand, web mail apps, like mail.google.com, have caused problem.
Providing information about how you are reporting would be helpful. Are you using your browser to cut & past into the SpamCap web reporting application from your mail app? Or are you submitting vi email and then using your browser to go to spamcop.com? Or are you cutting & pasting from a web email application?
Any details would help others help you.
-
this would be the place.
-
5 hours ago, j4v3d said:
When can you expect to see less spam emails coming through?
There is no direct correlation between an individuals spam submission and a change in spam received.
An exception to that would be if your ISP (email server) uses the SpamCop Block List. Otherwise, there would not be a notices change.
-
1 hour ago, kolor said:
Now reporting is more fast and convenient.(smile)
Glad to hear things are better.
-
13 hours ago, gnarlymarley said:
unique identifiers to try to figure out who is reporting.
You give them more credit than evidence I have seen. Why spend the time and effort? Which is more cost effective 1) Maintain some database/records to sort out 10 100 emails out of a 100,000 emails sent? or 2) Just change IP/ host when/if you get blocked? For example I have been reporting ~20 years and my domain receives a hundred or so spam every day and I report them all. If your suggestion were correct you would think by now even the dumbest spammer/bot/cartel would have figured out to RED flag my domain; or at least some of the mailboxes they spam.
I admit I have no controls or filters on the front end of my mail server so that everything is received. I filter incoming locally, and report all the chaff.
Keep in mind, IMHO, most spammers or those running a bot farm, have bought or were given a tool, files of emails and content to send. Not the sharpest knives in the drawer. How often do you receive spam that has been mis configured? "Dear ," or "Hi <name>," Or some other obvious blank not filled in? I am male. I get spam for woman's underwear, morning sickness. Lots of UK specific events Those are the ones I spot among the drugs, sex, sunglasses and right wing and preppers..
Example 2) It level of smarts it takes to spam an anti-spam website AND not filter the forum out of the rotation after years and years (I am assuming no one here clicks trough )
Just my observation.
www.nospammer.net/SpamSubmission
in SpamCop Reporting Help
Posted
Let me expand on my shorthand reply
Yes, (If I had received the email you received), I would report this (email as) spam.
My apologies for any offense perceived in my comments. None was intended. Life is to short.