hank

Membera
  • Content count

    142
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About hank

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Contact Methods

  • ICQ
    0

Recent Profile Visitors

1,307 profile views
  1. Yep, emailed them. No reply yet but problem solved. I booted up an old computer (OSX 10.9.5 Mavericks) and was able to log in to reporting with its old (2012) password. Odd. Same old password works with my newer computer, too. OSX Sierra The new passwords sent by the password reset button still don't work. Firefox and Chrome, same behavior. Odd.
  2. Yeah, I know I can make misconfigured websites exceptions. But as I understand it, the misconfigured site can be hacked at any time so it's a silly risk to make an exception rather than mention it in hope whoever misconfigured the site will fix its security. Otherwise, eventually, some clever kid will hack the vulnerability. Right? Since I haven't been able to get a working password to let me use the reporting page for days now, I wonder if some crack hasn't already happened. Mentioned it here since the original poster is having similar problems, tho not identical error messages.
  3. and: The information you have entered on this page will be sent over an insecure connection and could be read by a third party. Are you sure you want to send this information?
  4. I can't log in; the new passwords sent in email aren't working. And I"m seeing this: The owner of cms.spamcop.net has configured their website improperly. To protect your information from being stolen, Firefox has not connected to this website. Learn moreā€¦ Report errors like this to help Mozilla identify and block malicious sites
  5. Sigh. Now a new one has gotten past Google and is getting forwarded from my-userid@spamcop by the dozens per hour. Mostly ending up in my ISP's graymail folder, fortunately. " a massive spam Email campaign has recently gone viral after effectively bypassing the Gmail anti-spam algorithm ..." http://www.binaryscamalerts.com/quantum-code-scam-software-review/
  6. > just creat a gmail account Problem is I used Spamcop as my primary email for many years, so it's my address of record for a lot of older contacts. And there's no automatic way of validating a new spamcop address for reporting, if I cancel the current one. I'd have to do the mailhosts routine again. If I change forwarding from Spamcop to send it all to Google, I still have to read through all the headers; Gmail does false positives occasionally too. 400 of the same word salad spams in the past 8 hours (sigh). At least I have a computer. Imagine dealing with this with only a smartphone, the way so many people in the world use email. It'd be overwhelming. From: "=?utf-8?B?5pmv54i95riF?=" <745942123@qq.com> To: <xxx@spamcop.net> Subject: =?utf-8?B?5qyi6L+O5b2S6Zif77ya6YKA5oKo5L2P5YaK5ba64pGk4pKP?= =?utf-8?B?6LWiNThP5o+QLC3lorrpjYbmsLjliKkzMzI0OTjjgIJDT03kvL3lrqLmnI3miaM=?= =?utf-8?B?OjMxOTIxNjUyOOeTtO+8jOWPquimgeaKlee0uOe6ouiLnuWkqeWkqQ==?= =?utf-8?B?5oqi77yM6aaW5ou16aS4Mk8gM08gNU/igLDkuIvnpZ3ikbnkvZXlsLE=?= =?utf-8?B?6YCBJF8k54m556CBNDnotJ0gICAgIA==?= Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2017 23:10:29 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Disposition-Notification-To: 745942123@qq.com X-Orthrus: tar=0 grey=no co=US os=//29 spf=fail dkim=none <p><font color=3D"DarkSlateGray">=E6=9D=A5<span style=3D"font:0px = a"><=E8=BF=9E=E9=98=B4=E9=9B=A8></span>=E4=BA=86<span style=3D"font:0px = a"><=E9=9B=B6=E5=94=AE=E6=80=BB=E9=A2=9D></span>=E6=B0=B8<span = style=3D"font:0px a"><=E9=A9=AC=E9=93=83=E8=96=AF></span>=E5=88=A9<span = style=3D"font:0px =... and so on and so on. Google Translate can't make any sense of this. Damn qq.com
  7. It appears I got more than 4,000 spams in the past 24 hours, all addressed to my userid@spamcop.net and forwarded by Spamcop to my ISP, which graymailed almost all of them. Maybe one or two per hour get past the graymail and I report those. Tiresome. Good thing my ISP isn't charging me for storage, just automatically deleting the graymail. Big annoyance to review all the headers and catch the occasional non-junk email out of the deluge. Maybe the answer is to just cancel my spamcop email address? Perhaps that's what the spammer wants me to do? At this point I'm still using the "mole" reporting hoping that's informing whoever adds lines to the blocklist.
  8. Bump. Yes, I know this thread is ten years old. Would anyone familiar with current (not ten year old) practice at Spamcop please comment? Is it still true that "mole" reporting does not add the spammer's IP to Spamcop's blocking lists? I'm getting hundreds of spams from qq.net every few hours and have been for days, guessing it's retaliation for having used Spamcop reporting. Most of them are being blocked into graymail by my ISP now, fortunately.
  9. > block the IP address Unfortunately "qq.com" can't be blocked by Spamcop, and that source apparently owns (or uses, or forges?) a huge number of IP addresses. I'd have to comb through hundreds of spams to make a complete list. I wish Spamcop would do that little chore. The spam seems to be using some kind of randomization process to vary both the word salad text and the header lines. Hundreds more came through overnight.
  10. The Preferences says: So -- the real point of reporting is to inform the blocklist process, right? I realize reporting doesn't reduce spam and in actual experience reporting usually validates the reporting email and produces a flood of more spam at first. But eventually my ISP, which uses the Spamcop blocklist, starts accumulating the spam (e.g. from "qq.com" to myuserid@spamcop.net, automatically forwarded to my ISP) And the spam ends up in my ISP's graymail folder. So seems to me that's the point of using the "mole" approach -- not validating the email address being used to report the spam, but still informing the blocklist. Or rather informing the "SpamCop administrators" who presumably are updating the blocking list -- aren't they? Is there still someone doing that, and is this how it's being done? Can anyone clarify why Spamcop calls the "mole" reporting "mostly pointless" in the Preferences explanation of that option? What's not the point here about this?
  11. Wouldn't it make more sense to ask Spamcop to filter obvious botnet attack email rather than forwarding them uncritically? Something tells me the Chinese government is uninterested in being helpful in this kind of interaction. I wonder if anyone else with a userid@spamcop.net account is being so favored. Yeah, the email is still coming through, addressed to my-userid@spamcop.net and forwarded to my ISP; 450 more overnight.
  12. -- Spamcop reporting system. Oh, dear: "proceed your request"? This language suggests someone's not paying close attention over at Spamcop.
  13. PS: "qq.com" is identified as the source of all the spams to myuserid@spamcop.net, but qq.com isn't blocklisted by Spamcop. That business has multiple IP addresses which it's using.
  14. So, reporting seems like it's just increasing the spam; 450 per hour now, all addresed to my userid@spamcop.net Spamcop forwards this spam to my ISP, which uses the Spamcop blocklist, so that it's getting filtered by my ISP. But quoting from the Preferences at Spamcop: ------quote follows------------------------------------------------------ Become a "mole" - Don't even send reports (mostly pointless) ... It has become painfully obvious that spammers are able to identify your email address by using tracking codes - even after SpamCop's attempts to munge them. It has also become plain that even the largest and most well-respected ISPs forward complaints intact to the accused. In response, we now offer the ability to send reports silently. These reports are not emailed and are not available to anyone but SpamCop administrators and will not be shared (except as aggregate counts). ----end quote--------------------------------------------------- So -- Spamcop administrators -- why is this called "mostly pointless" -- won't silent reports continue to inform your blocklist? Because as you say, the reports are just informing the spammers that userid@spamcop.net is valid. And the spam generation tool is using some kind of randomizer to slip spam past the blocklist, only 3 or 4 per hour now out of the hundreds they're sending. So I'm ready to switch to "mole" setting -- hoping I can trust Spamcop will keep adjusting the blocklist from "mole" reports. Can anyone verify this will work?