Jump to content

sgrayban

Members
  • Content Count

    10
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About sgrayban

  • Rank
    Member
  1. They are refusing emails... read response from them which I posted... ============================================ Scott Grayban, Your email to our support system could not be accepted because it was not recognized as coming from an email address belonging to one of our customers. If you need assistance, please email from the address you registered with us that you use to login to our client area. Please do let us know if we can assist you any further. Thank you for using our online ticketing system. ----------------------------------------------- Regards, WebExperts ======================================= Essentially they are saying we dont want any emails from anyone unless it comes from there domain or clients.
  2. webexxpurts.com has blocked any email to them if it isn't a customers of them. So any abuse complaints are not being delivered to them. RFC Ignorant has them listed for bad abuse email. See http://rfc-ignorant.org/tools/lookup.php?d...webexxpurts.com I had 2 spam emails from them and both complaints bounced back to me. That IP block email should be sent to null from now on. See parsed email at http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z5378836838z1...39106aec55dee5z --------- Tracking link: http://conversion2012.com/info/unsubscribe...mp;L=8&N=13 [report history] Resolves to 176.61.139.140 Routing details for 176.61.139.140 [refresh/show] Cached whois for 176.61.139.140 : bd[at]webexxpurts.com Using last resort contacts bd[at]webexxpurts.com ---------- The bounced email back from them Scott Grayban, Your email to our support system could not be accepted because it was not recognized as coming from an email address belonging to one of our customers. If you need assistance, please email from the address you registered with us that you use to login to our client area. Please do let us know if we can assist you any further. Thank you for using our online ticketing system. ----------------------------------------------- Regards, WebExperts
  3. sgrayban

    Reporting problems today?

    Is spamcop broken for good ? It's been weeks since this issue has started and over half of the spam I report can't be parsed for days resulting in old spam email that can't be reported and defeating the intended reason to use spamcop. The lack of any communication from the tech guys and leaving it up to forum admin to answer is pointless. It also shows that spamcop doesn't care anymore because this issue has been going on for weeks with no official answer and the servers not responding. So do we report here or not anymore ? Cause I'm wasting my time trying to report spam and the gateway broken.
  4. I got a spam email in my gmail account from another gmail user and SC couldn't parse the email. The link to see it is http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z1226900092z3...774d7ef2747637z Is gmail doing this so that they can't be seen as a spam source at all?
  5. http://members.spamcop.net/sc?id=z11955519...ea5a2d80665127z ISP claims to have taken action against account, however the ISP has done nothing. All links still work and after contacting menshealth they deny everything including the spam they are supporting. If the ISP is qwest which hosts AKAMAI forget any help from them. If the ISP is rodale.com which is referred in the email forget that as well. They host and control menshealth.com which is pointed to by all those click tracking links in the spam email. As a paid member I am challenging the ISP's claim of action. They have done nothing to stop the spammers and deny any knowledge of spam being sent and spamcop even comtacting them. The email is spam. They faked the headers claiming I SENT IT !!! Its spam.
  6. Just a FYI here about AT&T's abuse dept. I have a neighbour who works for them and he told me yesterday that they forward all spam reports they get to the customer in question. He also said that since AT&T refuses to allow munged headers to remove the reporter that he advises people to simply not report any spam to AT&T because the spammer will most likely retaliate and then deny any knowledge of the spam. He also said the abuse_rbl[at]abuse-att.net forwards to the same abuse[at]att.net mailbox.
  7. sgrayban

    My "Canadian" Pharmacy

    I ran this over night and it placed 3,237 orders until they banned the IP address. I'm working on my 2nd IP address now LOL.
  8. I have gone over and over the headers that are sent by qwest.net mail servers and I just can't figure out why they are messed up and spamcop wont parse it. Here is the headers from one of my emails..... Return-Path: <alta.kenney[at]db.dk> Delivered-To: XXX[at]mail-spkn.uswest.net Received: (qmail 96595 invoked by uid 0); 13 Jan 2006 01:29:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mpls-cmx-10.inet.qwest.net) (63.226.138.10) by mpls-mailin-05.inet.qwest.net with SMTP; 13 Jan 2006 01:29:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 5604 invoked by uid 0); 13 Jan 2006 01:29:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO bluemail.ch) (222.136.133.19) by mpls-cmx-10.inet.qwest.net with SMTP; 13 Jan 2006 01:28:58 -0000 Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 00:27:57 -0200 Message-ID: <43C7102D.77A78E54[at]db.dk> From: "Alta Kenney" <alta.kenney[at]db.dk> To: XXX[at]uswest.net, XXX[at]uswest.net, XXX[at]uswest.net, XXX[at]uswest.net Subject: Uptick Stock MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.001 (windows; U; NT4.0; en-us) Gecko/25250101 Status: RO X-UIDL: 1137115742.96613.6795.mpls-mailin-05.inet.qwest.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Status: UC X-KMail-EncryptionState: X-KMail-SignatureState: X-KMail-MDN-Sent: SC complains this error.... Parsing header: 0: Received: from unknown (HELO mpls-cmx-10.inet.qwest.net) (63.226.138.10) by mpls-mailin-05.inet.qwest.net with SMTP; 13 Jan 2006 01:29:02 -0000 Hostname verified: mpls-cmx-10.inet.qwest.net Possible forgery. Supposed receiving system not associated with any of your mailhosts Will not trust anything beyond this header No source IP address found, cannot proceed. Add/edit your mailhost configurationFinding full email headersSubmitting spam via email (may work better)Example: What spam headers should look like Nothing to do. And yet I can't add qwest to my mailhost since it throws the same error on the validation from SC. Endless loop problem? Moderator Edit: fixed the mis-matched [ CODE ] amd [ QUOTE ] tags.
  9. I did try to find the offending header but didn't have any luck at it. And yes I did search the forum to see if there were other qwest issues. And since I can't make spam reports here I'll submit them to a few others I know that will have the IP's blocked. ------- This is for adding the mailhost Return-Path: <service[at]admin.spamcop.net> Delivered-To: sgrayban[at]mail-spkn.uswest.net Received: (qmail 72747 invoked by uid 0); 8 Jan 2006 16:27:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mpls-cmx-06.inet.qwest.net) (63.226.138.6) by mpls-mailin-01.inet.qwest.net with SMTP; 8 Jan 2006 16:27:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 98548 invoked by uid 0); 8 Jan 2006 16:27:14 -0000 Received: from sc-app2.ironport.com (HELO spamcop.net) (204.15.82.21) by mpls-cmx-06.inet.qwest.net with SMTP; 8 Jan 2006 16:27:14 -0000 Received: from [71.32.15.193] by spamcop.net with HTTP; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 16:27:13 GMT Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 16:27:13 GMT Message-ID: <wh43c13d61g9bda[at]msgid.spamcop.net> From: "SpamCop robot" <mhconf.uZbVdltvkSKrW0yr[at]cmds.spamcop.net> To: sgrayban[at]qwest.net X-SpamCop-Conf: uZbVdltvkSKrW0yr Subject: SpamCop account configuration email Precedence: list X-Mailer: Opera/9.00 (X11; Linux i686; U; en) via http://www.spamcop.net/ v1.516 Status: R X-UIDL: 1136737634.72753.2251.mpls-mailin-01.inet.qwest.net X-Status: NC X-KMail-EncryptionState: X-KMail-SignatureState: X-KMail-MDN-Sent: -------------------------------------------- ------------------- This is from the spam I recieved Return-Path: <benitomcFarland46[at]bluewin.ch> Delivered-To: sgrayban[at]mail-spkn.uswest.net Received: (qmail 4211 invoked by uid 0); 8 Jan 2006 10:40:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mpls-cmx-10.inet.qwest.net) (63.226.138.10) by mpls-mailin-08.inet.qwest.net with SMTP; 8 Jan 2006 10:40:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 36236 invoked by uid 0); 8 Jan 2006 10:40:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO informatik.uni-hamburg.de) (211.229.190.163) by mpls-cmx-10.inet.qwest.net with SMTP; 8 Jan 2006 10:40:58 -0000 Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 06:01:27 -0500 Message-ID: <BFKOBGIMKOLADBOCKHMEGPELJHAB.benitomcFarland46[at]bluewin.ch> From: "Benito McFarland" <benitomcFarland46[at]bluewin.ch> To: sgraybill[at]uswest.net, sgraybeal[at]uswest.net, sgrayban[at]uswest.net, sgray99[at]uswest.net Subject: Will this Stock be a "Super Nova?" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Status: RO X-UIDL: 1136716858.4217.6942.mpls-mailin-08.inet.qwest.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Status: UC X-KMail-EncryptionState: X-KMail-SignatureState: X-KMail-MDN-Sent: ------------------------------------------------------- Neither of which I could get to work here.
  10. Qwest.net mail system really sucks. The don't provide correct email headers or they remove some. When trying to add my mailhost from them I am getting the error Any help on this please?
×