Jump to content

phredx

Members
  • Content Count

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About phredx

  • Rank
    Newbie
  1. Oh, whoops. I found a different "read before posting" somewhere else in the FAQ I guess. I missed the pinned item. Anyway, thanks for all the feedback. The goal in the end, of course, being to prevent spam...
  2. That's interesting. As far as I know, those headers have always reported "by 0" there. I had an older SpamCop account where emails to tfo[at]monsterlabs.com were able to be reported successfully most of the time. Here's a current example in a spam I'd report if it were working: Return-Path: <diljhbuuj[at]mindspring.net> Delivered-To: tfo[at]window.monsterlabs.com Received: (qmail 19509 invoked by alias); 22 Sep 2005 16:14:55 -0000 Delivered-To: alias-ml-tfo[at]monsterlabs.com Received: (qmail 19496 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2005 16:14:55 -0000 Received: from ml-hw3.monsterlabs.com (HELO listserv.moses.com) (216.183.105.184) by 0 with SMTP; 22 Sep 2005 16:14:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 15470 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2005 16:08:22 -0000 Received: from 66-214-245-79.dhcp.gldl.ca.charter.com (66.214.245.79) by 0 with SMTP; 22 Sep 2005 16:08:22 -0000 Return-Path: <RoscoeCompton[at]attglobal.net> Received: from flashmail-fe3.flashmail.com (mail.flashmail-fe3 [216.239.161.152]) by be3 (Cyrus v2.2.10) with LMTPA; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 11:11:46 -0600 X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2 Received: from fastermail.com (bay10-f23.bay10.fastermail.com [205.158.62.76]) by animail-fe3.animail.cnet (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j4BM34K2006584 for <tfo[at]monsterlabs.com>; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 21:13:46 +0400 Received: from mail pickup service by attglobal.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 11:10:46 -0600 Message-ID: <BAY10-F236A1BA982DC2A8744D6D0B9300[at]phx.gbl> Received: from 217.115.153.194 by by10fd.bay10.attglobal.net with HTTP; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 13:11:46 -0400 X-Originating-IP: [64.4.202.107] X-Originating-Email: [RoscoeCompton[at]attglobal.net] X-Sender: RoscoeCompton[at]attglobal.net From: "Enlargment Systems Inc." <RoscoeCompton[at]attglobal.net> To: tfo[at]monsterlabs.com Subject: Information on Longz Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 14:10:46 -0300 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 14:12:46 -0300 (UTC) FILETIME=[7744B350:01C55675] Lines: 16 In this section: Received: from 66-214-245-79.dhcp.gldl.ca.charter.com (66.214.245.79) by 0 with SMTP; 22 Sep 2005 16:08:22 -0000 Is this saying that ml-hw3.monsterlabs.com is reporting it's fqdn as 0 since from ml-hw3.monsterlabs.com is the next host to receive mail? The mail winds up on an IMAP server at monsterlabs.com, so as far as I know, the final delivery system is on their network. I suppose it's possible that their system near the same time I set up a new SpamCop account, but that seems too coincidental to me. And, yes, I read the "read before posting" stuff where I thought applicable. If I missed something, I apologize.
  3. Here's a tracking URL for a recently submitted spam. http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z808421467z1d...f2070399fbd7cfz I've followed the Mailhost configuration for all my email addresses. The fact that this one is telling me that ml-hw3.monsterlabs.com is not associated with any of my mailhosts makes me think that tfo[at]monsterlabs.com, which is the address that received this spam, is not completely configured, but I'm not sure what steps to take next.
×