Jump to content

hawkeye

Members
  • Content Count

    7
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About hawkeye

  • Rank
    Newbie
  1. It was down for about 6 hours. But it is back up and working. Guess I shouldn't complain. I have tons of spam to report.
  2. It is 3:45 pm PDT here in California and I am logged into spamcop and am reporting my spam. I don't see any difference from the old version. Did the update process OK?
  3. I am getting the same error. Must be a problem with the server. If you look at the Reporting Server Status, you will see that reports are being submitted, but no reports are being sent. I think everyone is having this problem.
  4. The author of "Complainterator" has since moved to http://ksforum.inboxrevenge.com/. The product is now at Version 22.9. I have had good success utilizing the program with registers deleting domains of spammers. Also some good information at the forum on spam in general.
  5. hawkeye

    Webmail down?

    I am getting the same error.
  6. hawkeye

    reporting down?

    From the user group today the following:
  7. hawkeye

    Strange EMail

    Sorry if this is the wrong forum to post this message, but I was unsure of which one was appropriate. Can anyone tell me why I would have received the following message at my hotmail account? I know I could just delete it, but was just curious of what was going on. I don't run a mail server. Just use wemail. X-Message-Info: JGTYoYF78jHZLuGjCVm9BLlTgi6LLjCh Received: from aup.shaw.ca ([204.209.209.129]) by mc11-f21.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6824); Wed, 31 Mar 2004 08:59:56 -0800 Received: from aup.shaw.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by aup.shaw.ca (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2VGwrim002645; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 09:58:53 -0700 Received: (from apache[at]localhost) by aup.shaw.ca (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id i2VGwrK5002643; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 09:58:53 -0700 Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 09:58:53 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <rt-539[at]aup.shaw.ca> X-Mailer: Perl5 Mail::Internet v1.61 Reply-To: rt[at]aup.shaw.ca Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" RT-Originator: X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8 Managed-BY: RT 3.0.9 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/) Subject: [aup.shaw.ca #539] Email is in RBL _ DENIED _ (by bl.spamcop.net from jimenez_tw[at]cap.bekkoame.ne.jp reason Sending IP 24.83.202.11 support spam ) Sender: Apache <apache[at]orion.corp.shaw.ca> RT-Ticket: aup.shaw.ca #539 Message-Id: <rt-3.0.9-539-21326.13.3825616441543[at]aup.shaw.ca> Precedence: bulk To: hawkeye1111[at]hotmail.com, updatestatusonly[at]mynetwatchman.com X-RT-Loop-Prevention: aup.shaw.ca From: "The RT System itself via RT" <rt[at]aup.shaw.ca> Return-Path: apache[at]aup.shaw.ca X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Mar 2004 16:59:58.0184 (UTC) FILETIME=[99154E80:01C41741] The only reason a serious ISP or email administers would be on such a list is that he do not yet know about it being listed. Otherwise he would already have fixed the wrongfully configured server. Or he terminated the contract with the offending customer that put him on that list. We have also tried to send this letter on the following standardized addresses: ======================= postmaster[at]24.83.202.11 postmaster[at]h24-83-202-11.vc.shawcable.net postmaster[at]shawcable.net abuse[at]shawcable.net ======================= But very often administrators that don't know how to configure a secure mailserver, don't know that they have to implement these system addresses either. And we feel that you will probably get better results if you call or send this your self. Most responses we get are about the spelling and grammar from postmasters and administrators. They are usually angry that we have made their customers aware about their problems. This is kind of silly as the Information given is easy to understand anyway, and we could have sent the letter in correct Swedish instead. But as our purpose in sending this is neither to make it unreadable nor to make it offensive to anyone. Our purpose is to inform about systems being misused or miss configured so that the administrators gets a fair chance to fix their servers. So if you're an administrators please don't get angry just fix your email servers and we will be happy to relay your messages again. As a result your customers will be happy and you will get less angry calls and letters making you happy as well. The few administrators, postmasters and ISP's that just don't give a damn, will probably be noticed by their customers anyway. As these letters will keep arriving although they are probably just a very small part of the end users problems. Please send any comments to postmaster[at]sverige.net Date time = 2004-03-31 16:55:39 Subject = Hi Message-ID = <AIJIAFBLNANOJACECKMEEADGAAAA.jimenez_tw[at]cap.bekkoame.ne.jp> rcipient = jx[at]hth.com rbl list = bl.spamcop.net ErrorMessage = 543 http://spamcop.net/w3m?action=checkblock&ip=24.83.202.11 IP sup. spam Reason = Sending IP 24.83.202.11 support spam Denied IP = 24.83.202.11 Message Source 10 lines ======================= Received: from [24.83.202.11] by skorpan.sverige.net (JPHS RBL mail from jimenez_tw[at]cap.bekkoame.ne.jp) with SMTP id for jx[at]hth.com; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 18:55:39 +0200 Message-ID: <AIJIAFBLNANOJACECKMEEADGAAAA.jimenez_tw[at]cap.bekkoame.ne.jp> From: "Percy Jimenez" <jimenez_tw[at]cap.bekkoame.ne.jp> To: friddie[at]hth.com, bmaster[at]hth.com, jx[at]hth.com Subject: Hi Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2004 09:15:36 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 =======================
×