Jump to content

Tres Wright

Members
  • Content Count

    2
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About Tres Wright

  • Rank
    Newbie
  1. Tres Wright

    Please help, our legitimate business is blocked!

    Thanks guys, I appreciate the help! I'll talk to the bosses about it. I doubt we'll be able to move to another server though because SBC is one of our clients. We may just have to live with our email not getting through to a couple of people. It's unfortunate that spam Cop blocks legitimate businesses like ours in the interest of throwing a wider net to catch as much spam as possible. spam is of course a big problem, but it should be dealt with in a manner that doesn't infringe on legitimate business. I would rather delate a few spams each day and know that I am getting all legitimate messages sent to me than chance not getting good messages in an attempt to block the bad. Thanks again.
  2. Hello, I've read through the FAQ and hope I am posting in the right place I am an architect with a small firm named "Brand-Sayers Architects, Inc." in the Dallas, Texas area. We have been receiving bounceback messages from some of our clients and consultants for months now, and I'm finally taking the time to see if I can get it resolved. We do not have a permanent IT person (we only have 15 employees), but we do have a consultant. I spoke with him about our email being blocked and he thinks it may have something to do with the fact that we are tied to an SBC mail server, but he did not know of a solution. Below is one of the many bounceback messages I have received, please let me know if there is any further info you need. This has been very frustrating, we are a legitimate business and we correspond a lot via email and it's difficult when some messages don't go through. I hope we can get some help in resolving this. Thank you! --Tres Wright -----Original Message----- From: MAILER-DAEMON[at]mail26a.sbc-webhosting.com [mailto:MAILER-DAEMON[at]mail26a.sbc-webhosting.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 3:02 PM To: twright[at]brand-sayers.com Subject: failure notice Hi. This is the qmail-send program at mail26a.sbc-webhosting.com. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. <klee[at]staleysteel.com>: 216.201.128.40 does not like recipient. Remote host said: 554 Service unavailable; Client host [216.173.237.164] blocked using bl.spamcop.net; Blocked - see http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?216.173.237.164 Giving up on 216.201.128.40. --- Below this line is a copy of the message. Return-Path: <twright[at]brand-sayers.com> Received: from mx02.stngva01.us.mxservers.net (204.202.242.66) by mail26a.sbc-webhosting.com (RS ver 1.0.95vs) with SMTP id 4-0132978119 for <klee[at]staleysteel.com>; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 16:02:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from www.brand-sayers.com [216.173.246.121] (EHLO Computer00) by mx02.stngva01.us.mxservers.net (mxl_mta-1.3.8-10p4) with ESMTP id 7ccaec34.29117.398.mx02.stngva01.us.mxservers.net; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 16:01:59 -0500 (EST) From: "Tres Wright" <twright[at]brand-sayers.com> To: "'Kimberly Lee'" <klee[at]staleysteel.com> Subject: FW: Return Approvals on Comerica Projects - Status Update Request Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 15:02:30 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0634_01C61C40.3F195FB0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Thread-Index: AcYcX8wyTVvnLOtASxuBbiAnyIULzwABILpQAAOKLyA= X-spam: [F=0.2459419899; heur=0.984(6700); stat=0.010; spamtraq-heur=0.343(2006011807)] X-MAIL-FROM: <twright[at]brand-sayers.com> X-SOURCE-IP: [216.173.246.121] Message-ID:<20060118160214.GA13297[at]mail26a.sbc-webhosting.com> X-Loop-Detect:1 X-DistLoop-Detect:1 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0634_01C61C40.3F195FB0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit By the way, our office does not have auto-responder capabilities, so I don't think this is a spam trap issue. Thanks, Kimberly Moderator Edit: removed a lot of extra vertical whitespace, e-mail content with no header data (but with 'personal' data included) so was not helpful ....
×