Jump to content

phillyd2

Members
  • Content Count

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About phillyd2

  • Rank
    Newbie
  1. phillyd2

    SpamCop is killing us!

    Here we go again :angry: Hi. This is the qmail-send program at mail15c.boca15-verio.com. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. <steven[at]cems.com.sg>: 210.193.7.31 does not like recipient. Remote host said: 550 Spamcop, http://spamcop.net/w3m?action=checkblock&ip=131.103.218.142 Giving up on 210.193.7.31. --- Below this line is a copy of the message. Return-Path: <dbaranyai[at]tufftemp.com> Received: from mx02.bcrtfl01.us.mxservers.net (131.103.218.98) by mail15c.boca15-verio.com (RS ver 1.0.95vs) with SMTP id 1-0656264226; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 11:37:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from www.tufftemp.com [209.238.190.188] (HELO DaveBaranyai) by mx02.bcrtfl01.us.mxservers.net (mxl_mta-1.3.8-10p4) with SMTP id 33605d34.11240.234.mx02.bcrtfl01.us.mxservers.net; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 11:37:07 -0500 (EST) From: "David Baranyai" <dbaranyai[at]tufftemp.com> To: "Steven Tan \(CEMS Pte Ltd\)" <steven[at]cems.com.sg> Cc: "K. K. Kanoria" <prolific[at]cal.vsnl.net.in> Subject: GLASSTECH INDIA 2006 Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 11:39:06 -0500 Message-ID: <OHEEKOIGKJFNLGAGFAGPKEGJCJAA.dbaranyai[at]tufftemp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0061_01C62011.9E32A590" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <002b01c61fcb$87191d30$2300a8c0[at]LAPPY> X-spam: [F=0.0052631579; heur=0.500(-6100); stat=0.010; spamtraq-heur=0.343(2006012201)] X-MAIL-FROM: <dbaranyai[at]tufftemp.com> X-SOURCE-IP: [209.238.190.188] X-Loop-Detect:1 X-DistLoop-Detect:1 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. 131.103.218.142 listed in bl.spamcop.net (127.0.0.2) If there are no reports of ongoing objectionable email from this system it will be delisted automatically in approximately 23 hours. We contacted Verio again and they said that there is nothing they can do as SpamCop is doing the blocking, not them. We just want to reply to emails! We do not send spam nor does anybody else here. Can you guys post answeres that a normal person can understand?
  2. phillyd2

    SpamCop is killing us!

    Not quite sure what all this means. Are you saying that we were listed because we are sending too many emails that there is no proof are spam? Please also tell me how our ISP can contact the deputies at spamcop.net Also what are deputies?
  3. phillyd2

    SpamCop is killing us!

    sorry but I'm new here. What rant are you talking about? If another has ranted than I do NOT want to be merged with them
  4. SpamCop is killing us! We are a international business that rely most on emails for communications. Almost every day we get emails bounced back as blocked by SpamCop. First to be clear, we do not and never had sent spam in any shape or form. We do not even do mass emails. Many times our blocked emails are ones we are replying to! We have already contacted our ISP (verio.com) who informed us that nothing can be done. We always get the following: 131.103.218.142 not listed in bl.spamcop.net So we are never listed, how come our messages are blocked so often? We are up to sometimes 5 a day! I do not want to insult and we hate spam too but this is getting crazy! Here is the last one, as of today: -----Original Message----- From: MAILER-DAEMON[at]mail15c.boca15-verio.com [mailto:MAILER-DAEMON[at]mail15c.boca15-verio.com] Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 5:02 PM To: dbaranyai[at]tufftemp.com Subject: failure notice Hi. This is the qmail-send program at mail15c.boca15-verio.com. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. <armando[at]tecnoglass.com>: 200.110.128.4 does not like recipient. Remote host said: 553 Blocked - see http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?131.103.218.142 Giving up on 200.110.128.4. --- Below this line is a copy of the message. Return-Path: <dbaranyai[at]tufftemp.com> Received: from mx29.bcrtfl01.us.mxservers.net (131.103.218.137) by mail15c.boca15-verio.com (RS ver 1.0.95vs) with SMTP id 2-0421248077; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 17:01:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from www.tufftemp.com [209.238.190.188] (HELO DaveBaranyai) by mx29.bcrtfl01.us.mxservers.net (mxl_mta-1.3.8-10p4) with SMTP id 19a00d34.27880.082.mx29.bcrtfl01.us.mxservers.net; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 16:54:25 -0500 (EST) From: "David Baranyai" <dbaranyai[at]tufftemp.com> To: "Armando" <armando[at]tecnoglass.com> Subject: PO for Kevlar Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 17:03:19 -0500 Message-ID: <OHEEKOIGKJFNLGAGFAGPAEDDCJAA.dbaranyai[at]tufftemp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0016_01C61D1A.3F08E2E0" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <20060118145118.GA54763[at]mail15c.boca15-verio.com> X-spam: [F=0.0121951220; heur=0.500(-7800); stat=0.010; spamtraq-heur=0.550(2006011907)] X-MAIL-FROM: <dbaranyai[at]tufftemp.com> X-SOURCE-IP: [209.238.190.188] X-Loop-Detect:1 X-DistLoop-Detect:1 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0016_01C61D1A.3F08E2E0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_001_0017_01C61D1A.3F08E2E0" ------=_NextPart_001_0017_01C61D1A.3F08E2E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit XXXX Our Reply Message Text XXXX -----Original Message----- From: Armando [mailto:armando[at]tecnoglass.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 2:58 PM To: 'David Baranyai' Subject: PO for Kevlar Importance: High XXXX Original Message Text XXXX
×