Jump to content

igb

Members
  • Content Count

    7
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About igb

  • Rank
    Newbie
  1. Thanks for the reply. Some entries were cut and pasted from Emails. However, some were definitely added using the white list link in the Web mail client. It's probably worth putting something about entries needing to be in lower case on the page where you enter data into the whitelist, een though the data is suppposed to be automatically lower cased. I'll go and modify my entries now. Ian.
  2. Thanks, I have re-checked my white list and it seems correct. Is there a way to import/export it? I would like to try exporting it to check for any unusual characters. Ian.
  3. Here are two more: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:31:33 -0000 [18 Mar 2004 10:31:33 GMT] Delivered-To: spamcop-net-ibarton[at]spamcop.net Disposition-Notification-To: "Jean White" <Jean[at]JVWhite.freeserve.co.uk> From: Jean White <Jean[at]JVWhite.freeserve.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <002b01c40cd7$26f970c0$e6374e51[at]chalky> Received: * (qmail 21743 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2004 10:46:09 -0000 * from unknown (HELO blade3.cesmail.net) (192.168.1.213) by blade4.cesmail.net with SMTP; 18 Mar 2004 10:46:09 -0000 * (qmail 18663 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2004 10:46:08 -0000 * from smtp-relay02.x-mailer.co.uk (212.69.217.31) by blade3.cesmail.net with SMTP; 18 Mar 2004 10:46:08 -0000 * from [212.69.195.23] (helo=ianba-24644-001.dsvr.co.uk) by smtp-relay02.x-mailer.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1B3uzK-0004zO-59 for ibarton[at]spamcop.net; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:42:58 +0000 * from cmailm4.svr.pol.co.uk (cmailm4.svr.pol.co.uk [195.92.193.211]) by ianba-24644-001.dsvr.co.uk (8.11.7/8.11.7) with ESMTP id i2IAgvA12575 for <ibarton[at]thecottage.org>; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:42:57 GMT * from modem-4040.baboon.dialup.pol.co.uk ([81.78.31.200] helo=chalky) by cmailm4.svr.pol.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.14) id 1B3uzI-0007a7-Nw for ibarton[at]thecottage.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:42:57 +0000 References: <4056B2B9.2090907[at]thecottage.org> Return-Path: <Jean[at]JVWhite.freeserve.co.uk> Subject: Re: Parish Council Minutes To: ibarton[at]thecottage.org X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 X-Priority: 3 X-spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on blade4 X-spam-Level: X-spam-Status: hits=0.0 tests=none version=2.63 X-SpamCop-Checked: 192.168.1.213 212.69.217.31 212.69.195.23 X-SpamCop-Disposition: Blocked bl.spamcop.net Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 19:02:31 GMT [18 Mar 2004 19:02:31 GMT] Delivered-To: spamcop-net-ibarton[at]spamcop.net From: John <John[at]Thecottage.org> Message-Id: <200403181902.i2IJ2VL24154[at]www0.mh.bbc.co.uk> Received: * (qmail 9252 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2004 19:02:33 -0000 * from unknown (HELO mailgate.cesmail.net) (192.168.1.101) by blade4.cesmail.net with SMTP; 18 Mar 2004 19:02:33 -0000 * (qmail 23184 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2004 19:02:32 -0000 * from smtp-relay02.x-mailer.co.uk (212.69.217.31) by mailgate.cesmail.net with SMTP; 18 Mar 2004 19:02:32 -0000 * from [212.69.195.23] (helo=ianba-24644-001.dsvr.co.uk) by smtp-relay02.x-mailer.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1B42mm-0006iC-6M for ibarton[at]spamcop.net; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 19:02:32 +0000 * from mailgw2.mh.bbc.co.uk (mailgw2.mh.bbc.co.uk [132.185.144.142]) by ianba-24644-001.dsvr.co.uk (8.11.7/8.11.7) with ESMTP id i2IJ2VT21863 for <ian[at]Thecottage.org>; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 19:02:31 GMT * from www0.mh.bbc.co.uk (www0-mgt.mh.bbc.co.uk [192.168.232.30]) by mailgw2.mh.bbc.co.uk (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i2IJ2Vbe017486 for <ian[at]Thecottage.org>; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 19:02:31 GMT * (from nobody[at]localhost) by www0.mh.bbc.co.uk (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) id i2IJ2VL24154; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 19:02:31 GMT Return-Path: <cbeebies[at]bbc.co.uk> Subject: [BBC] CBeebies Postcards To: Daddy <ian[at]Thecottage.org> X-Authentication-Warning: www0.mh.bbc.co.uk: nobody set sender to cbeebies[at]bbc.co.uk using -f X-Disclaimer: This e-postcard is intended for the use of the addressee only. The BBC accepts no responsibility for the content of this e-postcard or unauthorised changes made at any time. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately at BBC Webmasters <mailto:webweaver[at]bbc.co.uk>. X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) X-Maybe-Originating-IP-Address: 195.92.168.175 :- 192.168.0.5, 217.135.20.36 X-spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on blade4 X-spam-Level: X-spam-Status: hits=0.0 tests=none version=2.63 X-SpamCop-Checked: 192.168.1.101 212.69.217.31 212.69.195.23 X-SpamCop-Disposition: Blocked bl.spamcop.net Both these are on my white list. It looks as though SpamCop is ignoring the white list and deciding to block the message because it's in one of its blocking lists. I am afraid that this makes SpamCop useless for me. I ned an absolute guarantee that all mail on my white list gets delivered no matter how Spammy SpamCop thinks it is. Ian. Headers: Show Limited Headers
  4. OK, here is another one that was blocked. I have Jean[at]JVWhite.freeserve.co.uk in my white list. Return-Path: <Jean[at]JVWhite.freeserve.co.uk> Delivered-To: spamcop-net-ibarton[at]spamcop.net Received: (qmail 19612 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2004 21:00:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mailgate.cesmail.net) (192.168.1.101) by blade4.cesmail.net with SMTP; 15 Mar 2004 21:00:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 5779 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2004 21:00:35 -0000 Received: from smtp-relay03.x-mailer.co.uk (212.69.217.32) by mailgate.cesmail.net with SMTP; 15 Mar 2004 21:00:35 -0000 Received: from [212.69.195.23] (helo=ianba-24644-001.dsvr.co.uk) by smtp-relay03.x-mailer.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1B2zCL-0006lM-Vn for ibarton[at]spamcop.net; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 21:00:34 +0000 Received: from cmailg2.svr.pol.co.uk (cmailg2.svr.pol.co.uk [195.92.195.172]) by ianba-24644-001.dsvr.co.uk (8.11.7/8.11.7) with ESMTP id i2FL0Xt11124 for <ibarton[at]thecottage.org>; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 21:00:33 GMT Received: from modem-3410.elk.dialup.pol.co.uk ([81.76.173.82] helo=chalky) by cmailg2.svr.pol.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.14) id 1B2zCC-0002zj-4F; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 21:00:24 +0000 Message-ID: <001901c40ad1$dd02b000$52ad4c51[at]chalky> From: "Jean White" <Jean[at]JVWhite.freeserve.co.uk> To: "ibarton" <ibarton[at]thecottage.org>, "Allan Richardson" <cllr.allan.richardson[at]crewe-nantwich.gov.uk>, "Bailey Rachel \(RBT\) Mid Cheshire Tr" <Rachel.Bailey[at]mcht.nhs.uk>, <Carolyndaw[at]aol.com>, "gary fowles" <gary.fowles[at]cheshire.pnn.police.uk>, "Louise Musa" <louise.musa[at]crewe-nantwich.gov.uk>, "Margaret Hollins" <cllr.margaret.hollins[at]crewe-nantwich.gov.uk>, "web site" <DcWedweb[at]aol.com> Subject: DODCOTT-CUM-WILKESLEY PARISH COUNCIL Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 17:39:57 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0007_01C40AB4.889D0780" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 Disposition-Notification-To: "Jean White" <Jean[at]JVWhite.freeserve.co.uk> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 X-spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on blade4 X-spam-Level: ** X-spam-Status: hits=2.7 tests=ALL_CAP_PORN,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06,HTML_30_40, HTML_MESSAGE,LINES_OF_YELLING,SUBJ_ALL_CAPS version=2.63 X-SpamCop-Checked: 192.168.1.101 212.69.217.32 212.69.195.23 X-SpamCop-Disposition: Blocked bl.spamcop.net
  5. That Email has been through my local system, so has collected a few extra headers. Ian.
  6. Thanks, I have removed the "[at]" from whitelist entries. However, that still doesn't explain why the email with the From: header: SueH[at]clanwest.demon.co.uk ended up in my Held Folder. I have specified that address in full in my white list. Here are the full headers of that email: Return-Path: <> Received: from banter.local ([unix socket]) by banter (Cyrus v2.1.15) with LMTP; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 20:09:54 +0000 X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2 Received: by banter.local (Postfix, from userid 96) id 8EE7B251A3; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 20:09:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from anne (anne.local [192.168.0.10]) by banter.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52E6E249B8 for <ian>; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 20:09:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pop.spamcop.net (UIDL=8:UID494-1073820685) by anne (VPOP3) with POP3; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 19:00:43 -0000 Delivered-To: spamcop-net-ibarton[at]spamcop.net Received: (qmail 1665 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2004 17:26:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mailgate.cesmail.net) (192.168.1.101)by blade4.cesmail.net with SMTP; 18 Feb 2004 17:26:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 5111 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2004 17:26:44 -0000 Received: from smtp-relay01.x-mailer.co.uk (212.69.217.30)by mailgate.cesmail.net with SMTP; 18 Feb 2004 17:26:43 -0000 Received: from [212.69.195.23] (helo=ianba-24644-001.dsvr.co.uk)by smtp-relay01.x-mailer.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.30)id 1AtVT9-0006yb-BQfor ibarton[at]spamcop.net; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 17:26:43 +0000 Received: from anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.91])by ianba-24644-001.dsvr.co.uk (8.11.7/8.11.7) with ESMTP id i1IHQhG12446for <ibarton[at]thecottage.org>; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 17:26:43 GMT Received: from clanwest.demon.co.uk ([212.228.141.235] helo=nwest.clanwest.demon.co.uk)by anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)id 1AtVSw-000OSA-0X; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 17:26:31 +0000 Received: by NWEST with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)id <FF2ZKZT0>; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 17:17:09 -0000 Message-ID: <0FC9E8F97015D211BC9000A0C9B5D7DE1FEC4A[at]NWEST> From: Sue Harrison <SueH[at]clanwest.demon.co.uk> To: Sue Harrison <SueH[at]clanwest.demon.co.uk> Subject: FW: Countryside Agency Restrictions and Exclusions Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 17:17:05 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain;charset="windows-1252" X-SpamCop-Checked: 192.168.1.101 212.69.217.30 212.69.195.23 194.217.242.91 212.228.141.235 X-spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none version=2.55 X-spam-Level: X-spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) It does have a From: header that exactly matches my whitelist. This is only one of many examples where emails with exact matches in a From: address and my white list are ending up in my Held Mail folder. At the moment this is making SpamCop almost useless for me, as Ihave to check every spam mail for things that got missed from my white list. Ian.
  7. I seem to be having a problem with the white list. My understaanding is that emails are checked against the whitelist first before any other action. In my whitelist I have: SueH[at]clanwest.demon.co.uk [at]rbi.co.uk yet emails with these From addresses regularly end up in my Held Mail folder, despite having From: headers matching these filters. Here are a couple of example headers: Message-ID: <0FC9E8F97015D211BC9000A0C9B5D7DE1FED0F[at]NWEST> From: Sue Harrison <SueH[at]clanwest.demon.co.uk> To: Sue Harrison <SueH[at]clanwest.demon.co.uk> Subject: FW: Grazing Livestock Paper Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 16:12:42 -0000 From: <FWI.NewsLetter[at]rbi.co.uk> To: <ibarton[at]thecottage.org> Subject: Farmers Weekly Interactive - Newsletter Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:16:20 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Message-ID: <CISLIVECN04oa2JB1nd00026669[at]cislivecn04.qhs.cis.live> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Mar 2004 18:16:20.0890 (UTC) FILETIME=[1EBD7FA0:01C4085E] X-SpamCop-Checked: 192.168.1.101 212.69.217.30 212.69.195.23 X-SpamCop-Disposition: Blocked bl.spamcop.net X-spam-Status: No, hits=2.7 required=5.0 tests=ACT_NOW_CAPS,CLICK_BELOW,EXCUSE_1,NO_REAL_NAME,OFFER version=2.55 X-spam-Level: ** Why is this happening? Thanks in advance. Ian.
×