Jump to content

Steve

Membera
  • Posts

    125
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Steve

  • Birthday 03/26/1985

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Long Island, NY

Recent Profile Visitors

1,956 profile views

Steve's Achievements

Advanced Member

Advanced Member (3/6)

0

Reputation

  1. Does anyone know if reports sent to sewr@senpluspluseop.onmicrosoft.com are read or ignored?
  2. Upon manually reporting the email referenced in the tracking link (I received the same email twice today from the same email address and IP address), Gmail's mailer-daemon replies with this: Querying the IP address (200.62.229.190) on LACNIC Whois only displays the email address gestion.ip AT claro DOT com DOT pe. SC parses the email and determines that this is a last resort contact. Is there any way to contact LACNIC to get them to update the abuse POC? Steve
  3. SC's parser determined that abuse AT vividwireless DOT com DOT au is the responsible party for the above IP address. But when querying it on APNIC's site, it says that abuse AT optusnet DOT com DOT au is the abuse contact (and is an Optusnet IP address). For any of the Optusnet spam I've received, SC's parser would automatically deliver a result of abuse_sc AT optusnet DOT com DOT au. Tracking URL: https://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z6883707653ze0a2ff6d67316ea0d5c8517df5690f95z Steve
  4. abuse AT sphere DOT ad DOT jp is the invalid contact (SC's parser determined this address to be one of several responsible for handling abuse reports for the above IP address. The others are abuse AT xrea DOT com, postmaster AT digi-rock DOT com, abuse AT sakura DOT ad DOT jp and abuse AT digi-rock DOT com) Tracking URL: https://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z6883013206z2874abc91aba362e311dfbdb7d0e2341z The other addresses I forwarded the report to didn't result in me receiving an email like the one above, so I'm assuming those addresses are valid. Steve
  5. Sent a report to both super AT plala DOT or DOT jp and postmaster AT plala DOT or DOT jp. Steve
  6. The last few spam email reports I sent (I manually report spam emails originating from Plala's network rather than through SC) regarding spam originating from Plala's network to super AT plala DOT or DOT jp have not resulted in replies from one of their agents informing me that the user had appropriate action taken against them. I've never not received a reply to a spam email I reported to them. I unfortunately no longer have any replies to a spam email I reported to them to provide. Here is the tracking URL for the last email I reported to them through SC (12/27/23): https://members.spamcop.net/mcgi?action=gettrack&reportid=7307895648 https://members.spamcop.net/mcgi?action=gettrack&reportid=7299159596 11/19/23 tracking url https://members.spamcop.net/mcgi?action=gettrack&reportid=7298399113 11/16/23 tracking url https://members.spamcop.net/mcgi?action=gettrack&reportid=7294994591 11/2/23 tracking url Steve
  7. Even SC's parser redirects reports from abuse AT microsoft DOT com to report_spam AT hotmail DOT com. Well, at least until it was recently changed to sewr [AT] senpluspluseop [DOT] onmicrosoft [DOT] com.
  8. According to Gmail's mailer-daemon, malware AT mnemo DOT com doesn't exist, yet SC's parser dev/nulls this address. https://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z6877159915z6bfdd31b37f0c6be4d2b2f3fb9c2bc3e
  9. From SC, but if you report manually through email (for SG) or Amazon (via their report form or email to abuse AT amazonaws DOT com). They respond and take action as they see fit.
  10. I'm not saying that SC's parser displayed that. I'm just confused as to why no explanation was given as to why the parser just dev/nulls the reports to Sendgrid's abuse address by default. Well, I did manually report the spam/unwanted email to abuse AT sendgrid DOT com and got this:
  11. Why is is SC dev/nulling reports to Sendgrid? There's no explanation when parsing emails sent from a Sendgrid customer. https://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z6864665553z76b4173c8cadf5ce84d01efaa688126ez It usually says something to the effect of "Reports disabled for abuse AT x DOT com/net, etc. ("x" referring to the domain the email was sent from), for emails, (not specifically Sendgrid) but no explanation by the parser is given.
  12. Now that the parser has been updated to reflect the correct abuse POC (irt AT nic DOT or DOT kr), SC's parser refuses to forward spam to that address?๐Ÿค”๐Ÿ˜‘๐Ÿคจ๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿคฌ https://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z6857548165z7e7c70a47f487652bf4ce763cf932b91z Having said that, was there any reason for me to even contact the Deputies to have them update the address in the first place?!?!?!?
  13. But they don't, so I'm not sure why that address shows up as the POC for abuse reports when irt AT nic DOT or DOT kr is the correct POC for abuse reports.
  14. SC's parser for this IP address (115.71.14.193) determined that tech AT daouidc DOT com is the responsible party to deal with spam reports but Gmail is unable to connect to their server when I manually attempt to report the spam to that address: Tracking URL: https://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z6857143701z88958ab2f99e8a67e0cb58bf69907cacz I have also queried the IP address myself and got these addresses: irt AT nic DOT or DOT kr, infra-tech AT daou DOT co DOT kr and hostmaster AT nic DOT or DOT kr and also forwarded said spam email TO those addresses. No option is available on SC's report form to refresh the cache for this address (tech AT daouidc DOT com) to show the correct abuse POC for the above IP address which is: irt AT nic DOT or DOT kr.
×
×
  • Create New...