Jump to content

JamesKing

Members
  • Content Count

    5
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by JamesKing

  1. One of my clients using a Dynamic IP from CableVision (Optimum Online) is getting email blocked, and the message points to their Dynamic IP. I have the exchange server configured to relay via CableVision, which was preventing blacklists from picking them up until last week. Here is the relevant info: Client IP Address: 24.186.106.144 Optimum Online Relay: mail.optonline.net (Configured via SMTP Connector) ------------------Header (from the forwarded rejection notice)----------------- Received: from mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (167.206.4.197) by remote.teamsharptech.com (10.1.0.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.1.358.0; Fri, 29 May 2009 15:16:12 -0400 Received: from irinabrokerage.com (ool-18ba6a90.dyn.optonline.net [24.186.106.144]) by mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTP id <0KKF00B7L6UVI570[at]mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for support[at]teamsharptech.com; Fri, 29 May 2009 15:16:08 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 15:16:04 -0400 From: Elvina Habibutdinova <Elvina[at]irinabrokerage.com> Subject: FW: Nexus WC0469562 To: <support[at]teamsharptech.com> Message-ID: <FEABB04918C9F24CA901E967674C2965075528[at]IRI-SVR-01.iri.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_RpVO6CvcNdq7avpwOhPxNg)" Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Thread-topic: Nexus WC0469562 Thread-index: AcnfuaQ8dJGf6qg/QSSu9JTHMBbqyAAABalcADYJGDA= X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Return-Path: Elvina[at]irinabrokerage.com X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: irinabrokerage.com X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: None Received-SPF: None (TEAMSTS-DC-01.teamsts.local: Elvina[at]irinabrokerage.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SCL: 0 X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PCL: 2 X-MS-Exchange-Organization-Antispam-Report: DV:3.3.7719.600;SV:3.3.7727.262;SID:SenderIDStatus None;OrigIP:167.206.4.197 X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-8.2.0.1103-5.600.1016-16672.001 X-TM-AS-Result: No--8.627900-5.000000-31 X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: No X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No ----------------------------------Email Header--------------------- --------------------Email Body-------------------------------- From: System Administrator Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 1:29 PM To: Elvina Habibutdinova Subject: Undeliverable: Nexus WC0469562 Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: Nexus WC0469562 Sent: 5/28/2009 1:28 PM The following recipient(s) cannot be reached: %username%[at]appund.com on 5/28/2009 1:28 PM The e-mail system was unable to deliver the message, but did not report a specific reason. Check the address and try again. If it still fails, contact your system administrator. <mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (tcp-daemon) #5.0.0 smtp;554 Service unavailable; Client host [mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net] blocked by bl.spamcop.net; Blocked - see http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?24.186.106.144> ---------------------Email Body----------------- I realize that any email sent from the dymanic IP should get rejected, but shouldn't the relay take care of that? Am I missing something? Thank you! James King
  2. JamesKing

    Email blocked while using ISP relay

    Excellent. Thanks again.
  3. JamesKing

    Email blocked while using ISP relay

    Point well taken, it just seems to me that when an admin accuses you of both not giving a damn and milking your client, it seems to dwarf any valid point he may have made. Again, I do appreciate the help provided here. Thank you. James King
  4. JamesKing

    Email blocked while using ISP relay

    How could I have determined this externally for myself? Thank you. James King
  5. JamesKing

    Email blocked while using ISP relay

    Comcast claimed that they were not spamming, that they monitor all traffic on Port 25, so I decided to post here, but WOW. I ask for genuine help and get blasted by the admin. Consider for a second that this is a tiny client, 4 employees, who as I am sure you have dealt with do not want to spend money to do things right. Believe me, she will get, as you say,"Slam-Dunked". Her initial coorespondence to us was in fact blaming us for being on blacklists when she already paid to have them removed before, hence the relay. Her antvirus did not pick up any Zombies. Thanks for you help, I have something to bring back to her door now. James King
×