Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'x-originating-ip'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Discussions & Observations
    • Announcements
    • Start Here - before you make your first Post
    • How to use .... Instructions, Tutorials
    • Going to make your first post here?
    • SpamCop Reporting Help
    • SpamCop Blocklist Help
    • SpamCop Email System & Accounts
    • Mailhost Configuration of your Reporting Account
    • New Feature Request
    • SpamCop Lounge
    • Geek/Tech Things
    • Suggested Tools and Applications
    • Testing
    • FAQ Under Construction

Calendars

  • Community Calendar

Found 1 result

  1. When submitting the numerous African scam emails to SC, SC inconsistently detects the X-Originating-IP address that is contained in most of them. Below are some examples. I'd say that about 10% of X-Originating-IP addresses listed in emails submitted to SC are detected and reported by SC. For the rest of those IP addresses, it requires manual email submission outside of SC to the abuse contacts. Why does SC detect and report so few of the X-Originating-IP addresses? (detected X-Originating-IP )X-Originating-IP: 41.85.176.110https://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z6403748467z699c93e5f840844ede2b8d8d2a237554zX-Originating-IP: 41.85.176.110https://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z6404117097zb4a331cc2a42604adca1ee392ccaabc0z(did NOT detect X-Originating-IP - NOTE that I tried removing the brackets and did a test submission, but the IP address was still not detected)X-Originating-IP: [41.86.234.162]https://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z6406866999z99adf4922fa966b5fed68ebaf3b2fd37zX-Originating-IP: [41.85.161.155]https://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z6406728731z23dd15f2eb5e25f40a46806c87083ddaz