Neil Parks Posted January 28, 2013 Share Posted January 28, 2013 Please look at http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z5458084753z8...fefa396f939e37z Parsing header: 0: Received: from ri1.zoner.com ([217.198.113.91]) by inMail24.com (IceWarp 9.1.5-7) with SMTP id NOI33752; Mon, 28 Jan x 14:58:52 +0100 Hostname verified: ri1.zoner.com inmail24 received mail from inmail24 ( 217.198.113.91 ) 1: Received: from ri1.zoner.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ri1.zoner.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C15B38004861; Mon, 28 Jan x 14:58:39 x (CET) Internal handoff at inmail24 2: Received: from a1modem (178-191-148-197.adsl.highway.telekom.at [178.191.148.197]) by ri1.zoner.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CBD510003141; Mon, 28 Jan x 14:58:38 x (CET) Hostname verified: 178-191-148-197.adsl.highway.telekom.at inmail24 received mail from sending system 178.191.148.197 Can't parse date of spam for age detection: Mon, 28 Jan x 14:58:38 x Please notice that the letter x has been inserted into the dates in the Received records. This is how the same Received records appear in the original spam as I received it: Received: from ri1.zoner.com ([217.198.113.91]) by inMail24.com (IceWarp 9.1.5-7) with SMTP id NOI33752; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 14:58:52 +0100 Received: from ri1.zoner.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ri1.zoner.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C15B38004861; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 14:58:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from a1modem (178-191-148-197.adsl.highway.telekom.at [178.191.148.197]) by ri1.zoner.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CBD510003141; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 14:58:38 +0100 (CET) The original spam also contained this Cc record: Cc: <peakspeed19[at]inmail24.com>, <peter_ho[at]inmail24.com>;, Mon[at]ri1.zoner.com, 28[at]ri1.zoner.com, Jan[at]ri1.zoner.com, 2013[at]ri1.zoner.com, "14:58:39"[at]ri1.zoner.com, +0100[at]ri1.zoner.com Notice that the apparent addresses in the "n1.zoner.com" domain are actually components of the date and time! To test whether this Cc record was affecting the Spamcop process, I resubmitted the spam with that one record--and ONLY that one record--removed. The result can be found in: http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z5458098409z5...f75cd686396f64z This second submission was processed and reported successfully. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turetzsr Posted January 28, 2013 Share Posted January 28, 2013 Hi, Neil, ...Sorry to hear of your problem. Smarter people than I may happen by here with some help but if that doesn't happen in a timely enough manner for you, I would suggest that you contact the SpamCop deputies directly at e-mail address deputies[at]admin.spamcop.net. ...Good luck and thank you for reporting spam. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Parks Posted February 1, 2013 Author Share Posted February 1, 2013 I may have inadvertently posted this to the wrong forum: http://forum.spamcop.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=13113 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farelf Posted February 1, 2013 Share Posted February 1, 2013 Merged to this location now Neil. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.