mrmaxx 0 Posted October 30, 2013 (edited) For some reason, SpamCop can't resolve the above website to an IP address. On my Windows machine I was able to do an NSLOOKUP and came up with 91.204.162.83, which RIPE says belongs to ATM.COM.PL or ATMAN.PL. The abuse contacts for this domain are: abuse[at]atman.pl (for atm.com.pl) noc[at]atm.com.pl (for atm.com.pl) Edit: Just parsed another spam with a slightly different website, NOSE.tabdietfat.at, which is in the same netblock. Edited October 30, 2013 by mrmaxx Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mrmaxx 0 Posted October 30, 2013 (edited) Tracking URL: http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z5619698230za...70143160febd8cz The website, kimono.tabdietfat.at is unresolveable by Spamcop. However, when I pull up a DOS prompt and do an nslookup, it comes up as 91.204.162.83, so it obviously is a valid address. I even refreshed my browser window to see if SpamCop was just getting a momentary hiccup, but that didn't help. FWIW, I just parsed another spam that has a slightly different web address on the same domain. The new site is nose.tabdietfat.at, and resolves to the same netblock, but a different IP. Edited October 30, 2013 by mrmaxx Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turetzsr 0 Posted October 30, 2013 ...Do you have any objection to my merging this post into your other one in the Routing / Report Address Issues Forum which appears to be exactly the same issue, kimono.tabdietfat.at? I don't see much advantage in having two and it could confuse people, especially people who want to follow up on it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mrmaxx 0 Posted October 30, 2013 ...Do you have any objection to my merging this post into your other one in the Routing / Report Address Issues Forum which appears to be exactly the same issue, kimono.tabdietfat.at? I don't see much advantage in having two and it could confuse people, especially people who want to follow up on it. Go right ahead. Wasn't sure the best place to put it, so I put it in both. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turetzsr 0 Posted October 30, 2013 ...Thanks, done! IMHO, this seems the (slightly) better choice, although the "SpamCop Reporting Help" Forum, where you placed the other post ("Spamcop can't resolve web address"), would have been perfectly good, too. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mrmaxx 0 Posted October 30, 2013 ...Thanks, done! IMHO, this seems the (slightly) better choice, although the "SpamCop Reporting Help" Forum, where you placed the other post ("Spamcop can't resolve web address"), would have been perfectly good, too. Well, there were two issues -- first SpamCop couldn't resolve the web address, and when it could, it couldn't find a reporting address. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turetzsr 0 Posted October 30, 2013 ...Ah, I see. But, then, both would seem to be classifiable as "Routing / Report Address Issues." <g> Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mrmaxx 0 Posted October 30, 2013 ...Ah, I see. But, then, both would seem to be classifiable as "Routing / Report Address Issues." <g> Works for me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
