Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
mrmaxx

kimono.tabdietfat.at

Recommended Posts

For some reason, SpamCop can't resolve the above website to an IP address. On my Windows machine I was able to do an NSLOOKUP and came up with 91.204.162.83, which RIPE says belongs to ATM.COM.PL or ATMAN.PL. The abuse contacts for this domain are:

abuse[at]atman.pl (for atm.com.pl)

noc[at]atm.com.pl (for atm.com.pl)

Edit: Just parsed another spam with a slightly different website, NOSE.tabdietfat.at, which is in the same netblock.

Edited by mrmaxx

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tracking URL: http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z5619698230za...70143160febd8cz

The website, kimono.tabdietfat.at is unresolveable by Spamcop. However, when I pull up a DOS prompt and do an nslookup, it comes up as 91.204.162.83, so it obviously is a valid address. I even refreshed my browser window to see if SpamCop was just getting a momentary hiccup, but that didn't help.

FWIW, I just parsed another spam that has a slightly different web address on the same domain. The new site is nose.tabdietfat.at, and resolves to the same netblock, but a different IP.

Edited by mrmaxx

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

...Do you have any objection to my merging this post into your other one in the Routing / Report Address Issues Forum which appears to be exactly the same issue, kimono.tabdietfat.at? I don't see much advantage in having two and it could confuse people, especially people who want to follow up on it.

Go right ahead. Wasn't sure the best place to put it, so I put it in both.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

...Thanks, done! IMHO, this seems the (slightly) better choice, although the "SpamCop Reporting Help" Forum, where you placed the other post ("Spamcop can't resolve web address"), would have been perfectly good, too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

...Thanks, done! IMHO, this seems the (slightly) better choice, although the "SpamCop Reporting Help" Forum, where you placed the other post ("Spamcop can't resolve web address"), would have been perfectly good, too.

Well, there were two issues -- first SpamCop couldn't resolve the web address, and when it could, it couldn't find a reporting address. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

...Ah, I see. But, then, both would seem to be classifiable as "Routing / Report Address Issues." :) <g>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

...Ah, I see. But, then, both would seem to be classifiable as "Routing / Report Address Issues." :) <g>

Works for me. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×