Lking

Just checking

21 posts in this topic

When forum auto whitespace removal isn't the look you're after (and 'center' doesn't quite do it)

use the (newly-added) 'indent' tag

(twice)

- lack of which had bugged me for a while ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
When forum auto whitespace removal
...Ooh, do tell more, please!
<snip>

use the (newly-added) 'indent' tag

<snip>

Nice, thanks!

...What I really want is an "indent first line" tag so I can stop with the stupid ellipsis!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Leading tabs and/or blanks are eliminated in posts (except inside 'code' and 'codebox' tabs IIRC). 'indent' works with an HTML <span> tag so is (effectively) a paragraph-type thing. I guess there are other ways but I don't know any off-hand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A "new" BB Code 'TAB':

&nbsp &nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp Here is an example of the 'tab' tag used to indent the beginning of a block of text. Only the first characters/line following the tag should indented, by one standard tab space (5 spaces), succeeding lines within the same text block defined by the tag revert to their normal left margin. No, I don't know what happens if you use it in conjunction with the other text positioning tags, 'right', 'left' or 'center', I leave that as an exercise for the student.

Note, once posted, use only "FULL Edit" else the non-breaking space characters become those annoying substitutions ( Â Â Â Â Â ) instead of clear space. Easily recovered - just re-edit (no changes needed) in full edit mode and submit.

Now, instead of a 3-character ellipsis one can use the 11 characters of opening and closing 'tab' tags. :P And at last we can show in plain text what headers with line continuation indents look like.

Received: from icp-osb-smtpdir7.iinet.net.au ([10.2.56.7])

&nbsp &nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp by icp-osb-dovedir-wa2.iinet.net.au (Dovecot) with LMTP id ZL55FQhpy1P3LAAA3sXqFA

&nbsp &nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp ; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 09:00:07 +0000

Even 'code' didn't always show that EXACTLY.

Received: from icp-osb-smtpdir7.iinet.net.au ([10.2.56.7])
	by icp-osb-dovedir-wa2.iinet.net.au (Dovecot) with LMTP id ZL55FQhpy1P3LAAA3sXqFA
; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 09:00:07 +0000

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

&nbsp &nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp Wow, Steve, excellent -- thank you! So, I'll continue this paragraph with some meaningless verbiage just so I can see the full effect of the "tab" command on a long paragraph, not that I have any doubt that it will work exactly as you describe it. Be that as it may, this relatively long paragraph should convince me beyond a reasonable doubt that it does, indeed, work as I wish. And since I don't see a need to use it in conjunction with other formatting commands, your caveat should not matter to me. :) <g>

&nbsp &nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp And, of course, I now see that it does exactly what I want -- thanks, again! Edit: except that neither [ tab ] nor [ /tab ] throws a line feed, as some other tags, such as [ quote ], do! But not a serious problem; I'll just have to enter my own explicit line feed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bad news: the forum server move has rendered those indents as: Â Â Â Â Â

DT

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Deos thsi baord hvae a splelnig cehkcer?

Doesn't seem to, but Chrome 34 for Linux has a nice one built in :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Munging e-mail addresses [at] [at]domain account[at] account[at]domain

Not quite as elegant as I remember it but near enough for government work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

&nbsp &nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp  'tab' tag - this has been fixed now but the fix not applied retrospectively since the tag was only available for such a short time before being scrunched in the forum update, nobbled before it was used but a handfull of times.

Well, worse things happen at sea. And at least it isn't ailiased out by a 'quick' edit this time.

No, no, save your applause ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

&nbsp &nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp ...*applause* :) <g>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Activated the ACRONYM tag, using SC to bring it to life**. Apart from standard acronyms, (just the one so far) it can be used in 'free form' to add commentary, explanation to any post, readers just "hover" their cursors over the underlined text (like hovering on an xkcd cartoon) - as to be seen in the post http://forum.spamcop.net/forums/topic/14446-keep-getting-hacked-please-read/page-2#entry90756 and below.

** had to wait for a thunderstorm, lightning, threw the switch and it was done. "It's ALIVE," I cried, joyously. The wife looked at me strangely then stood firmly in front of the cutlery drawer while the cat beat a stealthy but dignified retreat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

&nbsp &nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp Well, that's PFK (yes, I just invented that one -- I think! :) <g>)!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just checking - PFK - ah good, those 'free form' ones have no permanence outside of their original placement. Unlike the 'regular expressions' such as SC

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, alright then, TANSTAAFL tanstaafl Tanstaafl - TWO regular expressions, this one case-insensitive

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, alright then, TANSTAAFL tanstaafl Tanstaafl - TWO regular expressions, this one case-insensitive

&nbsp &nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp If I remember correctly (and it's been a very long time, so there's a very good chance that I don't! :) <g>), TANSTAAFL is what Heinlein used; too bad it doesn't work! :( <frown>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

&nbsp &nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp If I remember correctly (and it's been a very long time, so there's a very good chance that I don't! :) <g>), TANSTAAFL is what Heinlein used; too bad it doesn't work! :( <frown>

Yes, "The Moon is a Harsh Mistress" popularised it - certainly following publication of that it entered the general vocabulary (by about 1967). It is all you ever need to know about economics.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

&nbsp &nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp Oh, no, as an econ major I had to know a lot more than that! :) <g> But, yes, for most of us it is pretty much all that is needed; too bad so few know of it or, if they know, accept it. :( <frown>!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now