Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
lartingyou

Ironport LARTs bouncing? That's irony...

2 posts in this topic

I got a spam this morning, and when I tried to report it, it said netops-ironport[at]cisco.com was the address... but, in the end it just bounces. That is ironic, no?

From https://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z6154803852zb0fee552131aa619c626149cecf5f2f0z

Finding IP block owner:

Routing details for 68.232.140.118
[refresh/show] Cached whois for 68.232.140.118 : netops-ironport[at]cisco.com
Using abuse net on netops-ironport[at]cisco.com
abuse net cisco.com = abuse[at]cisco.com
Using best contacts abuse[at]cisco.com
abuse[at]cisco.com redirects to cesadmins[at]cisco.com
cesadmins[at]cisco.com bounces (475 sent : 238 bounces)
Sorry, no reporting addresses found for 68.232.140.118.
Nothing to do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I got a spam this morning, and when I tried to report it, it said netops-ironport[at]cisco.com was the address... but, in the end it just bounces. That is ironic, no?

&nbsp &nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp Maybe ironic that Cisco is "spamming" you but certainly not that SpamCop won't report Cisco as a spammer! :) <g>

<snip>

abuse[at]cisco.com redirects to cesadmins[at]cisco.com

cesadmins[at]cisco.com bounces (475 sent : 238 bounces)

<snip>

&nbsp &nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp CES was the outfit that used to provide the now-defunct "SpamCop" e-mail service; I am surprised at the apparent continued relationship between CES and Cisco!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0