vrapp Posted July 1, 2004 Share Posted July 1, 2004 Hello: here's sc parses the headers: ========== 0: Received: from 66.92.252.189 ([61.78.98.74]) by psism.polyscience.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 1 Jul 2004 04:06:04 -0500 No unique hostname found for source: 61.78.98.74 Polyscience received mail from sending system 61.78.98.74 1: Received: from 220.129.102.184 by ip-82-852-7-775.o.DPHGHALOLJIF[at]yahoo.com (AppleMailServer 67.4.1.8) id 931773387347629 via NDR; Wed, 25 Jun 2003 09:57:47 +0100 No unique hostname found for source: 220.129.102.184 Possible forgery. Supposed receiving system not associated with any of your mailhosts Will not trust anything beyond this header ========== As I understand, SC "Will not trust anything beyond this header" not because "Supposed receiving system not associated with any of your mailhosts", especially given that it's leg 1, but because 220.129.102.184 is not resolved? if I'm correct, then why the sentence about the non-association with my mailhosts? Vadim p.s. I also posted this in the newsgroup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wazoo Posted July 1, 2004 Share Posted July 1, 2004 And, as that's where I saw it first, here's what I posted over there .... I'd rather see the data as found in what I'd be able to see if you had provided a Tracking URL for this parse. The easy and possibly wrong answer is a simple set of flags set in the code and this is the 'default' error message ..??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wazoo Posted July 1, 2004 Share Posted July 1, 2004 Again, copied from newsgroup post; > http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z527816524zec...f0c08fb83255a7z Received: from 66.92.252.189 ([202.201.249.66]) by psism.polyscience.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 1 Jul 2004 06:35:28 -0500 Received: from [27.112.100.205] by 66.92.252.189 id 23Wtchu761wj; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 09:27:28 -0300 > http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z527816529z4c...aa8f8cd2820040z Received: from 66.92.252.189 ([212.101.89.117]) by psism.polyscience.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 1 Jul 2004 07:38:32 -0500 Received: from 148.4.35.139 by 212.101.89.117; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 19:33:10 +0600 Your first sample; Received: from 66.92.252.189 ([61.78.98.74]) by psism.polyscience.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 1 Jul 2004 04:06:04 -0500 Received: from 220.129.102.184 by ip-82-852-7-775.o.DPHGHALOLJIF[at]yahoo.com (AppleMailServer 67.4.1.8) id 931773387347629 via NDR; Wed, 25 Jun 2003 09:57:47 +0100 Are you doing any editing of the Received lines? How is the e-mail getting to your polyscience account? I would say that there is something "unique" in the way these lines are structured. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.