Email size

[nospambob]

Can my email size be enlarged?

 

See copy attached below

 

This is the mail system at host netmail10.mx.net.

I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.

For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster.

If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
delete your own text from the attached returned message.

                  The mail system

<nospambob@spamcop.net>: message size 13630542 exceeds size limit 10240000 of
   server vmx5.spamcop.net[184.94.240.124]
Reporting-MTA: dns; netmail10.mx.net
X-Postfix-Queue-ID: 8863857A6E4
X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; rparks@usa.net
Arrival-Date: Sat,  8 Dec 2018 03:16:36 +0000 (UTC)

Final-Recipient: rfc822; nospambob@spamcop.net
Original-Recipient: rfc822;nospambob@spamcop.net
Action: failed
Status: 5.3.4
Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; message size 13630542 exceeds size limit 10240000
   of server vmx5.spamcop.net[184.94.240.124]
Received: from nm10.cms.usa.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by netmail10.mx.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8863857A6E4
for <nospambob@spamcop.net>; Sat,  8 Dec 2018 03:16:36 +0000 (UTC)
X-USANET-Received: from nm10.cms.usa.net [127.0.0.1] by nm10.cms.usa.net via mtad (C8.MAIN.4.10U) 
with ESMTP id 727wLHDqd5152M10; Sat, 08 Dec 2018 03:16:28 -0000
X-USANET-GWS2-Tagid: UNKN
X-USANET-GWS2-MailFromDnsResult: DnsFound
X-USANET-GWS2-Security: TLSv1;AES128-SHA
Received: from mail-qt1-f174.google.com [209.85.160.174] by nm10.cms.usa.net via smtad (C8.MAIN.4.12Y) 
with ESMTPS id XID606wLHDqd8794X10 (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA); Sat, 08 Dec 2018 03:16:29 -0000
X-USANET-Source: 209.85.160.174  IN   bentonnews@gmail.com mail-qt1-f174.google.com TLS
X-USANET-MsgId: XID606wLHDqd8794X10
Received: by mail-qt1-f174.google.com with SMTP id t13so6785941qtn.3
       for <rparks@usa.net>; Fri, 07 Dec 2018 19:16:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
       d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
       h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:date:subject:message-id;
       bh=XwNu2j94KES02ZI0rPk8YcDSIPQT/QinxUe+T3FU27E=;
       b=Lo/g684I8e3xOhzStMpiKpFHZQ7hd82c6Fa0Ve7bc0md3BP7UjGZMFMtCVEz/AR+2v
        GvPs1v35BxE3U/OFJB2X88FJqVUwApgeOBGhvNO2kNftPrpLvbSUiTzVC7dghxcLQII9
        tEpGSTOODd9N7zwJ4mGIa93vvCOtUPGA1j7kIHZVrZfWp0D3D84sZBC/hDknlk+hHEyW
        AoheYwbqTWPDgyAq6tLN5HItX/QMFJoh6regq8IxJEHZafM6nMDU1JC8/Yr14kpiUfFw
        d6oAxCA1XGDiKX1NWTYiTc6fRtvKWgrkioZVV8d9EjPwRLPbUeic16BL/SeVLqPaGlRa
        YWJg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
       d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
       h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:date
        :subject:message-id;
       bh=XwNu2j94KES02ZI0rPk8YcDSIPQT/QinxUe+T3FU27E=;
       b=PJeX0HVfd+3VUgZR80RbkFbTCz8gOv9fXYY1t1G/SqLWl0tkCAjVrOCtmjB8BuyqO/
        JK9XgLfnTifwOxT6YfGAPfWvdVCVq6KwXLU1e56NLJwCnyTDMShf3OA10xMHgLdZE0c2
        gXKmEZhNuMT4tXmQQbPZRA8jArc+DJn/7efGZ2f9lEVzBMxLYy47hks5a3c6VsRO21Fr
        /MOTdFYCUtHQbZqcTiUigGbCkKpM/f6qofZ5j38Ux6WSoFEiAsCoGKNDpby+slh7/oXA
        FNSt3jGBGs9pF+RPM1I9QLPX3bboze1Qn0Ye+eTqjXwJXPa0Qs7vo2BOycYGOvj69uVu
        La5w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWaQkb3jazCeVQJkUFAezMK4CDv4M+tdIqa1bbzbPj7xHr0H83Y+
1j14EBlL8riKxqFbdMFb4Jc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/UROQV3FrX7kSEN7QuSvp+A7OWmFfh6reBGpgsY0r3dwtefmh3ZJvRughwNH6LBohBx3WYw8A==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:4104:: with SMTP id q4mr4462194qtl.349.1544238987646;
       Fri, 07 Dec 2018 19:16:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.10] (pool-71-173-217-73.hrbgpa.fios.verizon.net. [71.173.217.73])
       by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r56sm3883695qtj.30.2018.12.07.19.16.19
       (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
       Fri, 07 Dec 2018 19:16:24 -0800 (PST)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary=Apple-Mail-7DC59254-2ED2-41C1-BCB2-D258423837E9
From: David Kline <bentonnews@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2018 22:16:18 -0500
Subject: =?utf-8?Q?I_suspect_=E2=80=9Coops=E2=80=9D_won=E2=80=99t_cover_i?=
=?utf-8?Q?t?=
Message-Id: <8C918DA5-2DFD-4871-A0DC-74571D5B7FD5@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16C50)
To: undisclosed-recipients:;

[Lking]

10Mb is a rather high limit for email size for a system that has effectively been closed for several years.  The fact that you can still forward email through SpamCop.net without cost, is amazing.  The system was sold (what 3 yrs ago) and filtered email was continued, at not cost, as a courtesy to the then current customers.  About two years ago, with warning about the uncertainty of the future, email was no longer filtered but just forwarded through the system.  At that time it was my understanding that the forwarding service was intended to give legacy users time to stop using, in an orderly manner, spamcop.net email addresses.

My point is that the bandwidth, in and out, has not been paid for by users for several years. AND warnings have been given that the forwarding privileges may end at any time.  Increasing email max size and there by max bandwidth (which cost someone real money) could bring the legacy service to an end.

As just a user/contributor to SpamCop, I would suggest moving email/addresses to other mail services, starting a year or two ago. JMHO

[nospambob]

Hello LKing,

I do recall the change but it is still working for me. The site says it is free to forward to my email address ( Comcast/xfinity).  The main reason I kept using it was for the service of checking spam, etc.  It now seems it is just for submitting suspected URL's for individuals for free.  Since many sites are better now to filter for spam, etc. I might as well bypass Spamcop since it limits email size.

Thanks for the heads up,

Bob

https://www.spamcop.net/mcgi?action=wizard&amp;stage=1