Jump to content

yourbuddy trolling 2


yourbuddy

Recommended Posts

SpamCop is the only "significant" DNSbl listing 216.66.64.4

Seems there are some overly zealous amateur spam cops.

Stop using SpamCop, tell ISP and Corporate associates to

stop using SpamCop. They "jail" the innocent with crooks.

Yes, SpamCop does not do this directly. It's done indirectly

by providing (often erroneous) "evidence" to their users.

64.91.240.133 is (koala.liquidweb.com)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stop using SpamCop, tell ISP and Corporate associates to

stop using SpamCop. They "jail" the innocent with crooks.

Yes, SpamCop does not do this directly. It's done indirectly

by providing (often erroneous) "evidence" to their users.

Kindly cease and desist from making such allegations unless you accompany them with proof.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stop using SpamCop, tell ISP and Corporate associates to

stop using SpamCop. They "jail" the innocent with crooks.

Yes, SpamCop does not do this directly. It's done indirectly

by providing (often erroneous) "evidence" to their users.

Kindly cease and desist from making such allegations unless you accompany them with proof.

You have lots of proof in your own records :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have lots of proof in your own records

Since (almost) everyone here (including JeffG) is simply a user of the SpamCop system in one way or another, we do not have records other than the public listings of IP's to look at. If you provide the IP of the system you are referring to, we will then have the same proof you claim to have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have lots of proof in your own records

Since (almost) everyone here (including JeffG) is simply a user of the SpamCop system in one way or another, we do not have records other than the public listings of IP's to look at. If you provide the IP of the system you are referring to, we will then have the same proof you claim to have.

You will then have the means of harassment ;)

SpamCop already has a record of their own errors,

even if they're not accessible to their own members.

You know SpamCop has "reporting errors", don't you :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...