Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Lankou

[Resolved] 81.255.54.11

Recommended Posts

Hi

I got this everytime i am sending an e email to one of my friend. :(

Thanks

Franck

From: Service de distribution du courrier

Date: 03/18/06 17:38:23

To: franck.kerisit[at]laposte.net

Subject: Notification d'état de la distribution

- Ces destinataires ont été traités par le serveur de messagerie :

isabelt[at]microsoft.com; Échec; 5.1.1 (adresse de boîte aux lettres de destination incorrecte ou inexistante)

ATM à distance maila.microsoft.com : Diagnostic SMTP : 550 5.7.1 Email rejected because 81.255.54.11 is listed by bl.spamcop.net. Please see http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml for more information. If you still need assistance contact gtsrbl23[at]microsoft.com

_______________________________________________

Return-Path: <franck.kerisit[at]laposte.net>

Received: from MICROSOF-4BD44E (213.202.147.208) by mx.laposte.net (7.2.060.1) (authenticated as franck.kerisit)

id 43C538AA03F682FC for isabelt[at]microsoft.com; Sat, 18 Mar 2006 18:38:11 +0100

MIME-Version: 1.0

Message-Id: <441C44E3.000009.00496[at]MICROSOF-4BD44E>

Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 17:35:31 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)

Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed;

boundary="------------Boundary-00=_7J3CMY50000000000000"

X-Mailer: IncrediMail (5002206)

From: "Franck.kerisit" <franck.kerisit[at]laposte.net>

X-FID: 9B6FA3C4-40D6-45A4-8F48-E3EC305536DD

X-Priority: 3

To: <isabelt[at]microsoft.com>

Subject: =?iso-8859-1?B?Q29uZmlybWF0aW9uIGFjaGF0IGFwcGFyZWlsIG51belyaXF1ZQ==?=

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ATM à distance maila.microsoft.com : Diagnostic SMTP : 550 5.7.1 Email rejected because 81.255.54.11 is listed by bl.spamcop.net. Please see http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml for more information.  If you still need assistance contact gtsrbl23[at]microsoft.com

41440[/snapback]

Your provider is not stamping the IP source of email going through its email server

Your provider is not reading abuse reports sent to abuse[at]oleane.net

Your provider is sending email to SpamCop spamtraps! Spamtraps have around 17 alphanumeric characters which are above 128 bit or bank security to guess. They are obtained by Zombie Computers and or spam spiders that scrape addresses off websites and or newsgroups

Your provider is an idiot to get their email server listed by SpamCop! It is also listed by other less friendly Blocklists and this/your provider no doubt will deservedly be blocked by more

spam Sightings has a lot of spam evidence of your providers incompetence Get them to configure their email server properly so it records the IP source or expect it to remain blocked

Suggest you find a better provider

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your provider has a long track of being reported to SpamCop:

Report History:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Submitted: Monday, March 20, 2006 1:58:02 AM -0500:

[spam] *** spam *** FROM THE DESK OF:Dr.Ahmed Bello Jnr.(P.hd)

1694861198 ( 81.255.54.11 ) To: spamcop[at]imaphost.com

1694861196 ( 81.255.54.11 ) To: abuse[at]oleane.net

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Submitted: Sunday, March 19, 2006 11:06:31 AM -0500:

WINNING NOTIFICATION EMAIL:(CONTACT YOUR FIDUCIARY AGENT ASAP).

1694341249 ( Forwarded spam ) To: [concealed user-defined recipient]

1694341244 ( Forwarded spam ) To: [concealed user-defined recipient]

1694341243 ( 81.255.54.11 ) To: spamcop[at]imaphost.com

1694341236 ( 81.255.54.11 ) To: abuse[at]oleane.net

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Submitted: Saturday, March 18, 2006 11:13:26 PM -0500:

=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Notification_d'=E9tat_de_la_distribution?=

1693941990 ( 81.255.54.11 ) To: abuse[at]oleane.net

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Submitted: Saturday, March 18, 2006 1:49:21 PM -0500:

Greeting Dear Friend

1693624449 ( 81.255.54.11 ) To: spamcop[at]imaphost.com

1693624443 ( 81.255.54.11 ) To: abuse[at]oleane.net

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Submitted: Saturday, March 18, 2006 1:35:11 PM -0500:

Greeting Dear Friend

1693615864 ( 81.255.54.11 ) To: spamcop[at]imaphost.com

1693615857 ( 81.255.54.11 ) To: abuse[at]oleane.net

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Submitted: Saturday, March 18, 2006 10:01:14 AM -0500:

NOTIFICATION

1693461833 ( 81.255.54.11 ) To: spamcop[at]imaphost.com

1693461826 ( 81.255.54.11 ) To: abuse[at]oleane.net

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Submitted: Saturday, March 18, 2006 9:26:12 AM -0500:

Our Esteemed Winner!!!

1693435479 ( 81.255.54.11 ) To: abuse[at]oleane.net

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Submitted: Friday, March 17, 2006 2:30:34 PM -0500:

OUR ESTEEMED WINNER, CONGRATULATIONS!

1692710983 ( 81.255.54.11 ) To: abuse[at]oleane.net

Older Reports

Submitted: Friday, March 17, 2006 2:23:42 PM -0500:

my message

1692704151 ( z_User_Notification ) To: [concealed user-defined recipient]

1692704148 ( 81.255.54.11 ) To: spamcop[at]imaphost.com

1692704143 ( http://www.laposte.net ) To: abuse[at]oleane.net

1692704134 ( 81.255.54.11 ) To: abuse[at]oleane.net

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Submitted: Friday, March 17, 2006 2:00:56 PM -0500:

Dear Sir/Madam: REF MMGI/223/REP.....

1692686292 ( http://www.laposte.net ) To: abuse[at]oleane.net

1692686291 ( 81.255.54.11 ) To: abuse[at]oleane.net

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Submitted: Friday, March 17, 2006 10:16:22 AM -0500:

FROM: D J SHAW & Associate

1692522720 ( Forwarded spam ) To: [concealed user-defined recipient]

1692522719 ( 81.255.54.11 ) To: spamcop[at]imaphost.com

1692522717 ( http://www.laposte.net ) To: abuse[at]oleane.net

1692522706 ( 81.255.54.11 ) To: abuse[at]oleane.net

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Submitted: Friday, March 17, 2006 7:42:13 AM -0500:

FROM: D J SHAW & Associate

1692343624 ( 81.255.54.11 ) To: spamcop[at]imaphost.com

1692343623 ( http://www.laposte.net ) To: abuse[at]oleane.net

1692343622 ( 81.255.54.11 ) To: abuse[at]oleane.net

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Submitted: Friday, March 17, 2006 2:20:12 AM -0500:

Our Esteemed Winner!!!

1692110217 ( 81.255.54.11 ) To: abuse[at]oleane.net

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Submitted: Thursday, March 16, 2006 9:18:50 PM -0500:

=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Notification_d'=E9tat_de_la_distribution?=

1692099604 ( 81.255.54.11 ) To: [concealed user-defined recipient]

1692099603 ( 81.255.54.11 ) To: abuse[at]oleane.net

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Submitted: Thursday, March 16, 2006 3:12:30 AM -0500:

=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Notification_d'=E9tat_de_la_distribution?=

1691166549 ( 81.255.54.11 ) To: abuse[at]oleane.net

I could go on, some of these are non-delivery notifications which seem to have resulted in spamtrap reports as well..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This IP is in a very large and "growing" list of blocklists. Seems as if the spammers have more control of the machine than the owner does!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SPAMCOP SpamCop Blocking List: bl.spamcop.net -> 127.0.0.2

Blocked - see http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?81.255.54.11

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BLARSBL Blars Block List: block.blars.org -> 127.1.0.9

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PSBL Passive spam Block List: psbl.surriel.com -> 127.0.0.2

Listed in PSBL, see http://psbl.surriel.com/listing?ip=81.255.54.11

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SPAMCANNIBAL the SpamCannibal project: bl.spamcannibal.org -> 127.0.0.2

blocked, See: http://www.spamcannibal.org/cannibal.cgi?p...up=81.255.54.11

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BITASSCALL The AS and ISO3166 IPv4 and IPv6 address list: all.ascc.dnsbl.bit.nl -> 127.0.0.60

AS=3215 CC=FR URL=http://noc.bit.nl/dnsbl/

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CSMA McFadden Associates, IPs of mailservers that send spam twice in a short timefram: bl.csma.biz -> 127.0.0.2

http://bl.csma.biz/cgi-bin/listing.cgi?ip=81.255.54.11

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CSMA-SBL McFadden Associates, IPs of mailservers that send spam once in a short timefram: sbl.csma.biz -> 127.0.0.2

http://bl.csma.biz/cgi-bin/listing.cgi?ip=81.255.54.11

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

UCEPROTECTL3 UCEPROTECT®-Network Project - Level 3: dnsbl-3.uceprotect.net -> 127.0.0.2

Sorry, Net 81.255.54.0/24 is blacklisted at Level 3 by UCEPROTECT-Network see http://www.uceprotect.net

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SORBS spam and Open Relay Blocking System: Aggregate zone: dnsbl.sorbs.net -> 127.0.0.6

spam Received See: http://www.sorbs.net/lookup.shtml?81.255.54.11

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SORBSSPAM List of hosts that have been noted as sending spam/UCE/UBE to the admins of SORBS. : spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net -> 127.0.0.6

spam Received See: http://www.sorbs.net/lookup.shtml?81.255.54.11

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SORBSSPEWS-L1 spam Prevention Early Warning System - Level 1 Mirror: l1.spews.dnsbl.sorbs.net -> 127.0.0.2

! [1] misc16, see http://spews.org/ask.cgi?S703

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SORBSSPEWS-L2 spam Prevention Early Warning System - Level 2 Mirror: l2.spews.dnsbl.sorbs.net -> 127.0.0.2

! [1] misc16, see http://spews.org/ask.cgi?S703

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DNSBLAUT1 Reynolds Technology Type 1: t1.dnsbl.net.au -> 127.0.0.2

PLEASE SEE http://www.dnsbl.net.au/lookup/?81.255.54.11

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DNSBLAUSPEWS spam Prevention Early Warning System: spews.dnsbl.net.au -> 127.0.0.2

81.255.54.11 See http://spews.org/ and http://www.dnsbl.net.au/spews/

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DRBL-VOTE-SANDY Distributed RBL node: sandy.ru: vote.drbl.sandy.ru -> 127.0.0.2

040424:spam in progress

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DRBL-WORK-SANDY Distributed RBL node: sandy.ru: work.drbl.sandy.ru -> 127.0.0.2

zaraza:040424:spam in progress

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to you all :)

The provider is well aware of the situation and their techincal support is working on a resolution :)

Have a great day and thanks for all the information.

Franck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You are right they confirmed that spammers took over and they are trying to fight back

Nous avons bien reçu votre message, et nous vous en remercions.

Nous sommes victimes des spammeurs et nous employons les moyens nécessaires pour lutter contre ceux-ci.

Nous vous présentons nos excuses pour les désagréments subis et vous assurons que nous mettons tout en oeuvre pour résoudre cet incident dans les meilleurs délais et pour améliorer la qualité de nos services.

Nous restons à votre disposition pour toute information complémentaire, rubrique " Nous écrire ": http://www.laposte.net/cgi-bin/ecrire/ecrire.pl

Cordialement.

Le Service Clients laposte.net

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

English translation by way of Bable Fish:

We received your message, and we thank you. We are victims of the spammeurs and we employ the means necessary to fight against those. We present our excuses for the undergone nuisances to you and let us ensure you that we put all works about it to solve this incident as soon as possible and to improve quality of our services. We remain at your disposal for any additional information, heading "to write to Us": http://www.laposte.net/cgi-bin/ecrire/ecrire.pl Cordially. The Customer service laposte.net

Edited by lcusdtech

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×