Jump to content

dr_bobbs

Members
  • Posts

    21
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by dr_bobbs

  1. On 10/25/2019 at 11:41 AM, Lking said:

    Looking at some of my current spam it looks like the last "Content-Type:" may be out of place.  I would suggest after you past in the spam, insert a blank line after the "To: undisclosed-recipients:;" line.

    Hi Lking:

    FINALLY, I got another example where this happened again. (The previous one had gotten too old to report.)

    I tried your suggestion, and yes, it did work!

    Thanks!

  2. OK, now I am trying to submit spam from gmail that clearly DOES have a line of body text; but I still get this error message: 

    "

    SpamCop v 5.1.0 © 2019 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.
    Here is your TRACKING URL - it may be saved for future reference:
    https://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z6584873459z5344c0b39e5e54d496f00cfa617f17c6z

    No body text provided, check format of submission. spam must have body text.
    If reported today, reports would be sent to:

    Re: 209.85.220.65 (Administrator of network where email originates)

    network-abuse@google.com

    "

    I have tried inserting one or more blank lines, or extra lines of explanatory text. Still get the same error message.

    Submitting by pasting (since forwarding as an attachment looks like 1000x more effort than I wanted to spend to report one spam!)

  3. I don't understand why there must be body text. So, all a spammer has to do is put the spam message entirely in the subject line, with no body text, and then SpamCop is unable to process his spam? I get this message whenever I submit spam from a spammer who has recognized this way to be unreportable to SpamCop. When all spammers have figured this out, and put all their spam messages into the subject line with no body text, then SpamCop will become completely useless? So SpamCop is really so easy for spammers to get around? Am I missing something here?

×
×
  • Create New...