Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About shreff

  • Birthday 07/07/1967

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
  • ICQ

Profile Information

  • Location
    Sunny Phoenix
  • Interests
    fast machines that go Vrooooom!

shreff's Achievements


Member (2/6)



  1. AHHH, this FAQ seems to disagree w/ that FAQ section 7 OH oh, that seems wrong. It is how to change name used here on forum, not on webmail. So there's a need for this replacement in parrallel to the old one by letting the current (old) one expire this month?
  2. Steve, Wow. Some of that goes over my novice Email user knowledge. I leave grey listing on to simply not get spam. No more than 3/wk in the Held Mail folder. (But thanks for doing such a thorough explaination. Can I bug you on that dropped address idea? I have been curious if it's feasable to change my address from GoK75 to K75. But that would mean dropping one to create the new one. Could you point out a FAQ where I can read about how that would occur before my $30 annual dues are up in September?
  3. Actually Steve, this is important since you mention it.I don't need spamcop to filter my personal Email client. I only use it as web-mail for a public Email address. So I always interface via the web. But filters have been unreliable, say they filter mail, then there is nothing in the folder it was supposed to send to. Hence my question about how the two techniques interfere (filters and whitelists)
  4. Uh, except for the term dropping. See in my held mail folder there where 2 kinds of reasons, and the one about being blocked w/o SpamAssassin confused me. ------------- From: "AZGBC" <them [at] chapters.usgbc.org> Subject: August 2009 Central Branch Announcements- X-SpamCop-Disposition: Blocked cbl.abuseat.org ------------- From: <someone [at] alerts.careerbuilder.com> Subject: CareerBuilder.com Job Matches X-SpamCop-Disposition: Blocked SpamAssassin=7 -------------
  5. HOLY COW such a quick replies, Thanks. Excellent support. OK, that's done. However I cannot edit the original post to clear out Emails as Farelf recommends: "The message you posted should ideally be 'munged' to further protect your email..." It seems like he must have anyway, I don't see any [at] symbols. BTW you mention filters, there are those also on my own account. How do they interact with whitelists? Is it different/better to put a domain in my own filter rules or my personal whitelist? I assumed the latter and did so since I've had (personal) filters get ignored in the past.
  6. I have read FAQ and understand cbl.abuseat.org is a block list. Am I to understand that the email an organization has sent me is coming through a nasty server with lots of spam originating there too? I assume the solution to this is to put the domain in my whitelist. Or if that domain is a risk for receiving spam, perhaps I must also include the user left of domain. But I want to know if whitelist is the proper solution for a nasty domain? Here's the header, I didn't fully understand what to include from the pinned explaination, which I cannot see now. Content-Language: en-us Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0103_01CA1526.418A3E80" Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 17:08:58 -0700 [08/04/2009 05:08:58 PM MST] Delivered-To: me [at] spamcop.net From: AZGBC <them [at] chapters.usgbc.org>Add them [at] chapters.usgbc.org to my Address Book List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:some code [at] lists.usgbc.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <LYRIS-18508226-959454-2009.08.04-20.23.34--me#spamcop.net[at]lists.usgbc.org> Received: * (qmail 9633 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2009 13:07:07 -0000 * from unknown ( by filter8.cesmail.net with QMQP; 5 Aug 2009 13:07:07 -0000 * from lists.usgbc.org ( by mxin1.cesmail.net with SMTP; 5 Aug 2009 13:00:54 -0000 Return-Path: <them [at] chapters.usgbc.org> Sender: "AZGBC" <them too [at] usgbcaz.org> Subject: August 2009 Arizona Chapter Hot Topics Thread-Index: AcoVYO1j4voXqAFhS62eZn7+k9hg4A== To: "my name" <me [at] spamcop.net>Add me [at] spamcop.net to my Address Book X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=e8ZqhbnPf5UA:10 a=i8j2RIqPAAAA:8 a=wItniZhCAAAA:8 a=GtyeyTBGAAAA:8 a=jUwznEUyAAAA:8 a=AAvYLDLOAAAA:8 a=D0E7gLGeAAAA:8 a=bZubpC6RAAAA:8 a=y8I0kRxo58fHy9MV16wA:9 a=fn4KMekD9_QFveZFJaQA:7 a=rsFEytSwQTWJDBPQQOYlypS9ER0A:4 a=AnPQJl_LLbYA:10 a=cBY1HIx_dgUA:10 a=WjJal50LLiUA:10 a=vVRRvJnwi4IA:10 a=p2ikTtrZeIMA:10 a=tP_JIJnmG-0A:10 a=s2loLT2QvaoA:10 a=6Tv62J74zuAA:10 a=xX4ChL36oxYA:10 a=qoc59kaA1K8A:10 a=mF_JCN53VhjDcN5_:21 a=mG_cfGIjfYH-TkNl:21 a=yMhMjlubAAAA:8 a=SSmOFEACAAAA:8 a=d77Vm_4nfleKYYGAdDgA:9 a=qG6NE0mSNoCotnO2omEA:7 a=D6rGT4mo4n2LI_r0iEJWbWi2BEwA:4 a=TnagoCwi2LmBXNuH:21 a=JLCCALe2RF-hvjE2:21 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-IronPort-Anti-spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-spam-Result: ArwCALZqeEpE5vEtkWdsb2JhbACCKhMYl1sBAQEBCQsKBxMDqXQJj2yCNxSBTQWEHiE X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 X-spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on filter8 X-spam-Level: * X-spam-Status: hits=1.8 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_12_24,HTML_MESSAGE version=3.2.4 X-SpamCop-Checked: X-SpamCop-Disposition: Blocked cbl.abuseat.org
  7. To clarify this for me and all, does that mean you are using POP to move mail off other servers and into this one? That's what I understand it to mean. So you are reading Email on Webmail. The other method would be to use POP to move Email off here and read it on another Email client like Outlook.
  8. Well, I came looking to see the results of my posting that there was no change to post#1, and am glad to see it was responded to in a positive way, the struck-out text. Now Kae, (amazingly we signed up 12 days apart in 2005) I have (almost) always had problems with HTML Emails on webmail old and beta. Once in a while one comes thru as a readable page. I think it's MOSTLY images in-line where there's problems, and that is addressed in POST#1 by TrevorB. I tried changing options but would never find a solution. Instead of blank, I get a page full of machine code gibberish. I think it's just a limitation of using webmail. Post here or a PM if you learn why things don't come thru. (I can't look at your link, it want's me to log in to email, yours?)
  9. I don't like this at all! Don't you think the list should show some amount of improvement? Are you guys really improving the areas that needed atention? I'm glad the "FAULTY MAINTENANCE PAGE" issue was pointed out, for example. Ive clipped out the repetitive items in the Confirmed & Unconfirmed lists, but I don't think you guys are showing any improvements were made. I have been using the new version for a few weeks, back when it really was a Beta version. -Now even that URL is wrong (the beta is no longer necessary) -The intermittent "read receipt" seems unfixed and still not mentioned in lists above. As I complained, the lists stay static as nothing is being fixed nor added!
  10. News about Beta Webmail once mentioned a forum to check B4 click Problem report icon but am only seeing a list of confirmed & unconfirmed errors by Wazoo at another shot
  11. Pinned can't find in dictionary nor the link there to glossary (where I am now) would like to know if pinning prevents us from replying to a message, or what it does
  12. I am one of those users who doesn't want to build a system, just use it. Nor understands why there are so many places for FAQ and help sources. In fact I suppose you suggest I write my delete solution in the FAQ. But niether of the 2 FAQs in the grey bar at top of screen say Email FAQ. The Forum FAQ doesn't seem were I put a WEBMAIL technique. Nor is it current. Your June post says it's under construction. I am not being mean, just can't follow the online help.
  13. Hi there. If you searched all over for help on how to Delete all messages in some folder on your webmail then you're in for a rude awakening. All I found was convoluted time-out avoidance schemes with using a mail client. Or discussions about the Held Mail mailbox. I just deleted over 500 messages in a folder, and left the lower folders inside intact! Thank goodnes it's possible. Just go to folder manager screen, click button/box for that folder, and select action"Empty Folder. Why this is not even in the folder-screen-Help is sad. But it works! All lower folders are not touched.
  14. Dang, so many tests. And VER is still an unknown thing to many of us. All I wanted was a way to get a notice if I have held mail. So, are there really that many bugs? And since I am not one using a client to read my SC account mail, I guess the only way to get a valid report is to never look in the Held Mail folder betweeen scheduled report dates. Am not sure on this, but am not checking folder either. Regardless, I sure believe I've gotten blank reports even though have not looked in folder since mail arrived there. Very screwy indeed. Conclusion, HELD MAIL reports don't work.
  • Create New...