petzl

SpamCop members have no control over its blocklist, this is used only by ISP's that choose to use it You don't have a dedicated IP (ask Microsoft to see what's the deal)? Assuming you are not part of the problem (not using a double opt-in email list) You should be OK if you don't. Do this. Seems you are using a Microsoft shared IP, the main reason they keep getting block by spamtrap hits which are fictitious email addresses, which are scrapped by bots from websites where these addresses are put there as a poison. Spammers buy blocks of non-validated email addresses to do exactly that (end up in many spamtraps) For a Microsoft IP to end up on SpamCop's conservative spamtrap is beyond belief, it would require hits in the million a minute score? You suggesting we should swallow this spam with no defense? If I get spam I do my utmost to send spammers to court, I have had numerous successes!

My email address I use on Usernet was actually scraped by Microsoft, or more likely from me reporting their spam to them from that Gmail account Achieve more with free Microsoft 365 trial Now spamming me, no way I used this address to or for Microsoft, IMO it's expensive broken rubbish more-so than it's ever been? Unsubscribed from that one, went to their site to find they have me on their multiple product list so had to delist them all.

Just getting doddery in old age sorry

That is not a assessable tracking ling Which is found at top of submission before you submit

Just today I'm getting hammered from Microsoft with Child porn! AWS is the url link I also report this to the US FED's phishing-report[AT]us-cert[DOT]gov Child porn phishing spammer spammer pictures under 18 or made to look under 18 NO PROOF OF AGE available! SENT TO MINORS 2257 Regulations (C.F.R. Part 75), part of the United States Code of Federal Regulations, require producers of sexually explicit material to obtain proof of age for every model they shoot, and retain those records. Federal inspectors may at any time launch inspections of these records and prosecute any infraction. "unless the websites “perform reasonable age verification methods” — in short, requiring users to show government ID to prove they are 18 or older." No working unsubscribe

Not had a problem with a SpamCop Captcha yet, but others have reported same? There have been fixes given but can't recall what? You not using a dodgy IP by any chance? I know Google will do a BOT check on one sometimes for their Captcha. Send yourself say 19 minutes apart. Then see if the IP's match? If they don't it means Microsoft are IP hopping to avoid SpamCop's blocklists spam threshold algorithm ratioed to the volume of email going through that IP. Actually I don't often get Microsoft spam, but when it does start it's in the hundreds! I report everyone. As Gmail will turn off your email account if it is DOS attacked by too much spam! Gmail don't use SpamCop's Blocklist. But possibly just bit-bin spam sending IP's. I report all spam, also at a click of a Phishing button which may activate a bit-bin dump (if they have one)?

It is not compulsory for a ISP email server to use SpamCop's blocklist. I just use Gmail nowadays they don't.

I suspect Microsoft's way of handling it's spam blocked IP's is to turn them off, and use another one they have a vast number of them?

SpamCop block list only blocks a single IP when it hits a span threshold algorithm ratioed to the volume of email going through that IP. Then releases it when the spam stops for 24 hours, 40.107.8.113 is not presently listed so the flood of spam going though it has presently stopped it's spam flood. The range of IP's listed may not be blocked but may have been. For a Microsoft email IP to be blocked would be very high well above the ratio for most IP's! A lot of other big email providers just block rouge IP's and don't supply figures for doing so. SpamCop Block releases IP when spam attacks stop. Microsoft IMO do not seem to of worked out how to stop spammers. Gmail is pretty good at doing this.

Seems SpamCop Blocklist to be working well. Microsoft are the only ones to fix it, too many BOT spammers hitting spamtraps (fictitious email addresses) https://www.spamcop.net/w3m?action=checkblock&ip=40.107.8.113 40.107.8.113 listed in bl.spamcop.net (127.0.0.2) If there are no reports of ongoing objectionable email from this system it will be delisted automatically in approximately 6 hours. Causes of listing System has sent mail to SpamCop spam traps in the past week Other hosts in this "neighborhood" with spam reports 40.107.7.114 40.107.7.115 40.107.7.117 40.107.7.118 40.107.7.119 40.107.7.120 40.107.7.121 40.107.7.122 40.107.7.123 40.107.7.124 40.107.7.125 40.107.7.127 40.107.7.128 40.107.7.129 40.107.7.130 40.107.7.131 40.107.7.132 40.107.7.133 40.107.7.134 40.107.7.135 40.107.7.137 40.107.7.138 40.107.7.139 40.107.8.40 40.107.8.41 40.107.8.42 40.107.8.43 40.107.8.44 40.107.8.45 40.107.8.47 40.107.8.48 40.107.8.49 40.107.8.50 40.107.8.51 40.107.8.52 40.107.8.53 40.107.8.54 40.107.8.55 40.107.8.57 40.107.8.58 40.107.8.59 40.107.8.70 40.107.8.71 40.107.8.72 40.107.8.73 40.107.8.74 40.107.8.75 40.107.8.77 40.107.8.78 40.107.8.79 40.107.8.80 40.107.8.81 40.107.8.82 40.107.8.83 40.107.8.84 40.107.8.85 40.107.8.87 40.107.8.88 40.107.8.89 40.107.8.90 40.107.8.91 40.107.8.92 40.107.8.93 40.107.8.94 40.107.8.95 40.107.8.97 40.107.8.98 40.107.8.99 40.107.8.100 40.107.8.101 40.107.8.102 40.107.8.103 40.107.8.104 40.107.8.105 40.107.8.107 40.107.8.108 40.107.8.109 40.107.8.110 40.107.8.111 40.107.8.112 40.107.8.114 40.107.8.115 40.107.8.117 40.107.8.118 40.107.8.119 40.107.8.120 40.107.8.121 40.107.8.122 40.107.8.123 40.107.8.124 40.107.8.125 40.107.8.127 40.107.8.128 40.107.8.129 40.107.8.130 40.107.8.131 40.107.8.132 40.107.8.133 40.107.8.134 40.107.8.135 40.107.8.137 40.107.8.138 40.107.8.139 40.107.9.54 40.107.9.73 40.107.9.80 40.107.9.82 40.107.9.88 40.107.9.89 40.107.9.102 40.107.9.108

They use shared IP address so it may be spam from the same IP as you were using at that time?

That's all we need better to send a track Microsoft get worse at every turn then call them "upgrades" 40.107.223.128 abuse[AT]microsoft[DOT]com only one available which is ignored except for auto ack gleefully telling you to go to some obscure address Their CERT address is no longer for their phishing DOS attacks! phishing-report[AT]us-cert[DOT]gov If they even breathe perhaps need to tell Microsoft for Automatic spam forward as attachment website to sort their DOS attackers out? Microsoft have forums? Will faceup to converting to a Google operating system when this gets to slow with Microsoft deliberately bloated "updates" (downgrades) But won't save the problem with Microsoft spam!

the best way IMO is to charge a small fee US$10 (for life) via Credit card or PayPal for what was once free email accounts, this stops the bots. Twitter is anti-bot, and have hoops and jumps to get through.

"Abuse at microsoft com" will get you a Auto ack telling you where to send spam I don't believe they know how to deal with spammers free email accounts? Usually its phish[AT]office365[DOT]microsoft[DOT]com this week? But they must get millions of abuse reports, most of the clue'y automate by using a web page This criminal redirection links using Gmail Google cloud are reported here for instance https://support.google.com/code/contact/cloud_platform_report I send the .eml attachment as a file attachment with it in "chose file" button But they seem getting bogged down now also?

I like fried cannedSPAM on toast with vegemite, a fried runny egg. with a mug of coffee

They want you to use their Web pages for abuse If you do they act reasonably quick but maybe not in your favor, they will also contact the registrar Cloudfare's is https://www.cloudflare.com/trust-hub/abuse-approach/

They want you to use their Web pages for abuse Cloudfare's is https://www.cloudflare.com/trust-hub/abuse-approach/ Googles is (Usually a redirect for another spam site) https://support.google.com/code/contact/cloud_platform_report?hl=en First I send as attachment to spam source (then from sent email you can download the **.eml file, you can attach as file for attachments)

Used to be SpamCop automatically truncated? Not now it seems I have always truncated to save my data usage, sending obvious spammr links to the Registrar of Domain (if they have one) Namecheap right now is refusing to remove a child porn spammers domain which the IP owner always does (as has every other registrar)? Then I report the IP to the IP address, which always does! As well as report to the FED's (doubt if they even get off their ass), but the IP Owner does!

Doubt if Hotmail get the SpamCop report? You need to send a SpamCop tracking link for better advice! You need to find the registrar of the Website, SpamCop only reports the IP address of the Website. Also with porn sites they by law need to have those lude photo a government Age ID. Most if not all spammers do not have this! I always report this as child porn spam with this "Boiler plate". If you are a pediatrician you would be listened to I also forward as attachment to the FED's phishing-report[AT]us-cert[DOT]gov Child porn spammer pictures under 18 or made to look under 18 NO PROOF OF AGE available! SENT TO MINORS 2257 Regulations (C.F.R. Part 75), part of the United States Code of Federal Regulations, require producers of sexually explicit material to obtain proof of age for every model they shoot, and retain those records. Federal inspectors may at any time launch inspections of these records and prosecute any infraction. "unless the websites “perform reasonable age verification methods” — in short, requiring users to show government ID to prove they are 18 or older."

Ovh Canada SERT https://www.first.org/members/teams/cccs as it's a porn site a good boiler is this one Namecheap hate it because it's true no working unsubscribe phishing-report@us-cert.gov Child porn spammer pictures under 18 or made to look under 18 NO PROOF OF AGE available! SENT TO MINORS 2257 Regulations (C.F.R. Part 75), part of the United States Code of Federal Regulations, require producers of sexually explicit material to obtain proof of age for every model they shoot, and retain those records. Federal inspectors may at any time launch inspections of these records and prosecute any infraction. "unless the websites “perform reasonable age verification methods” — in short, requiring users to show government ID to prove they are 18 or older."

Mailhosts are different to a email address. https://www.spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/397.html If you register your mailhosts SpamCop whitelists their IP's and won't report them as a spam source. All SpamCop will report is the email server that sent you spam. Spammers use throw-away email accounts which make them almost impossible to be blacklisted by SpamCop Although this German one has just been listed, as long as it keeps getting spam reports or hitting spam-traps it will be relisted quickly https://talosintelligence.com/reputation_center/lookup?search=82.165.159.40 If you remove your mailhosts you need to check you are not reporting yourself, which if your email servers are set-up correctly won't happen!

To block a FREE throw-away German email IP is not likely to happed. each IP and they have a great many has to be reported a great many times or hit SpamCops spamtraps A source IP is likely to be blocked very quickly, a Mailhost is only needed if your email server is misconfigured and starts getting SpamCop reports.

Reporting the free throw-away email server mean the child porn spammer opens another one! The source of email is what SpamCop would report if you didn't have to use Maillhosts 176.113.82.77 United Arab Emirates

It's better to not add mail hosts if your are not reporting your provider. Mailhosts only allow the reporting of the email server that sent it to you. Without SpamCop will look for the IP source that sent it to the mail server you received it from free german disposable email server IP 82.165.159.40 Email source 176.113.82.77 United Arab Emirates spam LEVEL Very High From these headers trry passing see if SpamCop targets the source IP? 176.113.82.77 Delivered-To: XXX Received: by 2002:a05:7108:628f:b0:338:fe90:582f with SMTP id l15csp772717gdq; Fri, 17 Nov 2023 16:37:26 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGy0SbW8gkyRzW6Fn8MOIH/ATERyYKegZ+MeRcXOdcCEIpPxZkm+TAR8BAiCgEwy6M+fj6/ X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:400e:b0:32d:b991:1a71 with SMTP id cp14-20020a056000400e00b0032db9911a71mr476095wrb.0.1700267846070; Fri, 17 Nov 2023 16:37:26 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1700267846; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=zxdCS5JLDaqaq7P7XMM7NQIBFspLN+L/mDSW7XbVnlCmD4Ihp+gY0cAlAb8tQLkfEJ WtKTrgdaZG02D1jtpR+L1K08+OIn3hJjbeyJlYzq1a/bnV1ctDFlej/WSJKxgJgTNtZC lvoxPSxsByxKnqX/JZYlhdCyLhjcmC/v3fVqpA1H+S9YhDwMeYVS2giOlGZa9Tfs68du gBJ+6AwZdgRvYNyN4/quZtg1e0OvS0F2EC3kkOCb+jv2q8WUTcG53tDZunw7jyrUDsQl WUX77gj8aCqpnzTNhGCEeAHAZltR0V7nWqyzV5UOW7JabknV2m+dzKW2y9atnnK/Jlwj 3Lmw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=ui-outboundreport:date:to:reply-to:subject:from:message-id :mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=3KL27dqf22qQEknZJ4Ph61N6xVhBcCUOP6e6cKwYQiU=; fh=GIhbJBYT0EH5LQuP2tB5rvgib++oZw6Kh7U+a6RCbJI=; b=YyWRNQ56gf/7uvNsr3lTtf7k04FDqDpouPxD2Uz6kuS1+9y0dM4IfXYdGwCATWupw6 Yzd2dgyqRQCQz7RBhhy0J3TSQXTjefqOMuZ/l6Wldy/Od30A8ZL7uFGaiAYnynFNwrQX yB0ce5XeaWQbCyjVFAUvCWKqSNiaHLqvx8VS30GAKFkv4Xj6JhfAmldUEDLCciATcgpW yClCWZP+VlX1PHmC9h+Dp+EhANz3bf1VwOCKf/H7KoWjDnQSHlS1PloD30Ib5czE9fnX rQIRzo7GFKTv++EEpKDuljxkSqKH1QJP4ndXH6vwIY5iA+DEw7QLb5KLbuIZQXDvEgB5 GHyw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmx.de header.s=s31663417 header.b=cSlwoYYR; spf=pass (google.com: domain of belenkovd@gmx.de designates 82.165.159.40 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=belenkovd@gmx.de; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmx.de Return-Path: <belenkovd@gmx.de> Received: from mout-xforward.gmx.net (mout-xforward.gmx.net. [82.165.159.40]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d17-20020a5d5391000000b0032d9caeab1fsi1696840wrv.916.2023.11.17.16.37.25 for <XXX> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 17 Nov 2023 16:37:26 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of belenkovd@gmx.de designates 82.165.159.40 as permitted sender) client-ip=82.165.159.40; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmx.de header.s=s31663417 header.b=cSlwoYYR; spf=pass (google.com: domain of belenkovd@gmx.de designates 82.165.159.40 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=belenkovd@gmx.de; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmx.de DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.de; s=s31663417; t=1700267845; x=1700872645; i=belenkovd@gmx.de; bh=7sWLcV7aPhDKgHuijf29I4AzQHNtAmVg2aZWKeKw9Fc=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Date; b=cSlwoYYRCP59Zd9mgIqTpPO6hLvqU0GnI/i5SU48uOWBYk/TLMk/XpoMLdahk8o0 5LTjTVGZa9ZJ38S/xkni9ED3K55IADE4UsCSoNyKlKyU1+NckQwd/qWyv1P8KEB2m O1Rcyn6ozQNH+w+xuXGX98QWVuJA7du0naNCRryhPgX3sE3U7GfSMZABQP98yET32 XQmhSy9tB9ccvQZeuxGMIUkEYL63NTfYNHX6s4ES2syK7Z403j7TXjm4XjjOJZyET 0za490MQMXEj7pYfGdiGMu8UxTzZNrJ2fPnI0PPs4l1D6MfslMF8V/WtrBerHBUl6 vOUW2bDGGalxNHHYXg== X-UI-Sender-Class: 724b4f7f-cbec-4199-ad4e-598c01a50d3a Received: from mail.bigdealproduct.cyou ([176.113.82.77]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1Ml6qC-1rlDvl1zyu-00lUs0 for <XXX>; Sat, 18 Nov 2023 01:37:25 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <efUgbxJ.45851.894.jqU@bigdealproduct.cyou> From: ukraine women bang <belenkovd@gmx.de> Subject:💗💗ukraine women BANG💗 𝐋𝐞𝐭'𝐬 𝐠𝐨 𝐨𝐧 𝐚 𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐞 ♥𝐭𝐨𝐧𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭 🍑💋💌𝐈 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐤 𝐲𝐨 𝐮'𝐥𝐥 𝐥𝐢𝐤𝐞 𝐡𝐨𝐰 𝐢𝐭 𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐬! ❤️💋 Reply-To: reply_to@bigdealproduct.cyou To: XXX Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2023 00:37:13 +0000 X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:NfcqrB6DPxvyS0glquZuMAaIYOu0+A1aBxjZMQhL5IWhgZmssTe EgmDjBg5NzHJEzfZ8DNBU3AduDf5uyELIFbsfPYDPxQRjv/MWRjCWBzFbGjAedK9OIdR5vX zoSZj+eYCTaA3idnKhFn2qznLJh5lq4SRmcYkeCXqqDJgyks/p+e+zkgPCeO4iO23gAVtY6 erG1afbdhstKyYl+1XEzQ== X-spam-Flag: YES UI-OutboundReport: junk:10;M01:P0:2H8NFLdZTK4=;0Ga0ZMbp7usMdok8UXIkQZ9kiU2Wf DJvDPDAKLFJl2579iZcpHmH4pZ0gqYwyr4zkLkcveIZoNZzb315Ru3z4XtPVIDgdKm72ANtbm VomJoGeewFh+ECnnIyOSeYaANNfYprGUSlFjhMKQ0qEnoD1jusIcL3Cx62vCqND09JfeDV8qT cDwI/sX9uEMo/X2t5pyk7fUd/d94xqpRWkDgocy2qwr4WTeVAPQPqCmhhcocGP3u0ciB3IGAk k4e4FMswz6DSTN63Xep4nQ2wC/Ntt/3AW26tQARw2T0gvW1lU85RyQDBKXim2O+gpcUe1xkih eCWEAMx0s2WNw5wYi6n3NcW0HV8Wbjc/wqhxOi5tBS0OyQ4owYH1Ht9k5oVp4VijRgqD6M56e tABxtu2/HlLMK30GQPN1/R4tFkqRxSm4ds932ty/tUSZNwXvhJ2oBGXoAdw/Ardh8V4K59zkq 1+tuEi+H2aH9wfHsKqiIMGnMs9XO+0bQFkn5bVIHsBsqH42rVuDwgBiJkgHzxOYWZgcZ9138i pOguR1ZDA9KkGy9wpwS92Ta7SJ0Lst7JauwyNJOw7tXzL0c+6hBo1pacx7SP2uSjiYDRW1jod Sr6X/Q9FRCo3DGq9n2m2Z5ZbSAp6M8kIhqVAxUlqmIIsM7QNllwc56HiGOikbZzwUcQAlagN+ GEbijmFxexD4Tk1nW4XSjY4l76qh2+HdaGdXvsXR87KOKxbccGWoLRkles1usQKumqXNbRVay Hipi6CUqtTvdJH448oraaLTgONPII1RzgzyyArC3tZdZSVaVltbFUMd1AaXqRj0uHTtwXTcIt o2OJCt75SKCvqyjjyhGxfVxiHHZXGRRHk/u38pYaRs9rBNGrTSjGpS5VXeXv0Y4//Kf/jYT/D wgjM2pnpOG9whZgHmJ2EFjriwvlstpHhP8SjejqrybpXe715uuLBj5PaVi19B3JiMS8JbixLw Cw4hyZbd6nToBVlIKY83oJrw/jrIHSot8x51dGLan7xulAEVBtjOc1xn7ysJGs/DTE75qqkd2 eYOjo4h9LN69wLU0XveNqxEm/2ebQhjKHmp+6 TRUNCATED

Mines still going, not heard otherwise, but a bit of a worry that CIsco seems to be moving away from SpamCop importance?