[FAQ Entry: The Link Analysis Process]

"so the only Report recipients would be the source of the spam e-mail itself and the identified 'concerned party' involved with any (resolved) URLs."

Huh? Why would the source of the spam e-mail receive a report?

[FAQ Entry: The Link Analysis Process]

Can we have this stated clearly and unambiguously?

1. Assume that the name of my site is: wonderfulsite.com

2. spam arrives with obfuscated links and appears to be from superguy[at]wonderfulsite.com.

Most details in the spam e-mail refer to superguy[at]wonderfulsite.com

3. Despite this, I should report it.

No ISP will misinterpret this and start blocking wonderfulsite.com

Am I getting that right?

Send the spam report! Even if the 'from' field is my own domain!

The consequences will be OK!

Right?

Please reassure me. That's what I understand from the discussion so far, but it seems a tad unlikely as a conclusion.

Perhaps the following is relevant.

Issue - refresh button.

There's a lot of discussion above about the 'refresh' button or function, but I don't see any 'refresh' button on Spamcop, and using the browser refresh button doesn't achieve any result.

Could someone spell out in simple language what refresh button/function is meant in this context? As much as I try to 'refresh', the "from" field is still superguy[at]wonderfulsite.com

Sorry to be obtuse, but I'm just trying to follow the procedures. 50% of all spams that arrive now have cloaked or obfuscated urls