Enrico_C Posted April 13, 2004 Share Posted April 13, 2004 I would like that Spamcop Mail had something like an Ignore / Kill feature. For instance, if the email is BOTH in a geographical blackhole, AND is listed on Spamcop.BL or the like, AND has a high SpamAssassin score, then just kill it, i.e. do not accept it , (and the sender will get a "not delivered" notification, I guess, explaining why). On the other hand, if the email is OR in a geographical blackhole, OR is listed on Spamcop.BL or the like, OR has a high SpamAssassin level, then let's ignore it, i.e. accept it in the Held Mail. That is just an example. Even better, each user can set what makes a KILL and what makes an IGNORE, with a set of rules. For instance SpamAssassin >20 ---> KILL Nigeria BlackHoles ---> KILL SpamAssassin >4 AND Spamcop.BL --> IGNORE and so on... What do you think? Of course, that would require some server resouces Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dra007 Posted April 13, 2004 Share Posted April 13, 2004 How about a feature, say spam---->KILL, that would blow up the offending source of spam? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jseymour Posted April 13, 2004 Share Posted April 13, 2004 For instance, if the email is BOTH in a geographical blackhole, AND is listed on Spamcop.BL or the like, AND has a high SpamAssassin score, then just kill it, i.e. do not accept it , (and the sender will get a "not delivered" notification, I guess, explaining why). SpamAssassin can't do its work until the entire message arrives. At that point, it's not practical to hold the connection to the sending server open while SA runs. This means that Spamcop must accept the message before it can make a determination whether it should be "killed". Once accepted, the only options are to drop it in the bitbucket or generate a new bounce back to the (probably forged) sender. The latter is unacceptable as it's a form of abuse by itself. I think the former is a bad idea because the point of Spamcop is to report spam, not simply filter it. As for using the blocklists: Again, it may not be practical during the SMTP dialog to do the necessary lookups to get the settings specific to that user. Unfortunately, I believe the only good way to get that kind of capability is to run your own mail server. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jefft Posted April 15, 2004 Share Posted April 15, 2004 Jim has it exactly right. We have no way of reliably bouncing email based on criteria like you specified. Our only options at that point are to put it in Held Mail or silently delete it. JT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.