p4f Posted July 18, 2012 Share Posted July 18, 2012 Hello, The following is producing the error "IPv6 addresses are not supported". But offender www.newsparavoce.info resolves to an IPv4 addr. Is this a bug? Is there a way to circumvent this and submit the report? Delivered-To: x Received: by 10.114.14.201 with SMTP id r9csp252738ldc; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 10:38:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.191.74 with SMTP id dl10mr6681460qab.14.1342633086602; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 10:38:06 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <smtp[at]newsparavoce.info> Received: from newsparavoce.info (newsparavoce.info. [188.8.131.52]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l9si8845292qct.137.2012.07.18.10.38.05 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 18 Jul 2012 10:38:06 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of smtp[at]newsparavoce.info designates 184.108.40.206 as permitted sender) client-ip=220.127.116.11; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of smtp[at]newsparavoce.info designates 18.104.22.168 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=smtp[at]newsparavoce.info Received: from newsparavoce.info (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by newsparavoce.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2AD4AAE31 for <x>; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 14:33:34 -0300 (BRT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=newsparavoce.info; b=YzdvH5A8pn89uhDFEH+gVHfZWRy3H5nN/2KF2oUxbkp20lX6tt83fsV1CCU1TwrPkp7eJ5NVU1nKdvpQUi2OtjO6C0b2DwLdR2/nKc37OByHVmYw0yZ290MiQsn0gDoK; h=Received:To:Subject:Message-ID:Return-Path:Date:From:Reply-To:MIME-Version:X-Mailer-LID:List-Unsubscribe:X-Mailer-RecptId:X-Mailer-SID:X-Mailer-Sent-By:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; Received: from www.newsparavoce.info (unknown [IPv6:::1]) by newsparavoce.info (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <x>; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 14:33:34 -0300 (BRT) DNS server's address: 127.0.0.1#53 Non-authoritative answer: www.newsparavoce.info canonical name = mail.newsparavoce.info. Name: mail.newsparavoce.info Address: 22.214.171.124 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.