[87.139.128.0 - 87.139.255.255] abuse[at]t-online.de

[A B]

Once again, a Deutsche Telekom network. Using "-B" flag in whois or following URI in remarks gives abuse[at]t-online.de

whois 87.139.155.78[at]whois.ripe.net

[whois.ripe.net]

% This is the RIPE Database query service.

% The objects are in RPSL format.

%

% The RIPE Database is subject to Terms and Conditions.

% See http://www.ripe.net/db/support/db-terms-conditions.pdf

% Note: this output has been filtered.

% To receive output for a database update, use the "-B" flag.

% Information related to '87.139.128.0 - 87.139.255.255'

inetnum: 87.139.128.0 - 87.139.255.255

netname: DTAG-STATIC06

descr: Deutsche Telekom AG

T-DSL Business

static dial-up

country: DE

admin-c: DTIP

tech-c: DTST

status: ASSIGNED PA

remarks: **********************************

* Abuse Contact: *

* http://www.t-com.de/ip-abuse *

* in case of spam, Hack Attacks, *

* Illegal Activity, Violation, *

* Scans, Probes, etc. *

**********************************

[...]

[A B]

Pushing this topic because reporting for this network still does not work. Now there is even a second address:

% Abuse contact for '87.139.128.0 - 87.139.255.255' is 'auftrag[at]nic.telekom.de'

Unfortunately not even one is used by SpamCop.

[Farelf]

Thanks A B - I see the same, seems straight-forward, both appear to be valid and responsive e-mail addresses on SMTP query. abuse[at]t-online.de apparently preferred.

% This is the RIPE Database query service.

...

% Abuse contact for '87.139.128.0 - 87.139.255.255' is 'auftrag[at]nic.telekom.de'

...

inetnum: 87.139.128.0 - 87.139.255.255

...

person: Security Team

e-mail: abuse[at]t-online.de

changed: abuse[at]t-ipnet.de 20030210

changed: auftrag[at]nic.telekom.de 20110215

changed: auftrag[at]nic.telekom.de 20130617

Over to SC staff ...